Cited by 287Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

High Incidence of Non-Random Template Strand Segregation and Asymmetric Fate Determination In Dividing Stem Cells and their Progeny

Open access
Conboy, Michael J, Karasov, Ariela O, Rando, Thomas A·2007·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Decades ago, the "immortal strand hypothesis" was proposed as a means by which stem cells might limit acquiring mutations that could give rise to cancer, while continuing to proliferate for the life of an organism. Originally based on observations in embryonic cells, and later studied in terms of stem cell self-renewal, this hypothesis has remained largely unaccepted because of few additional reports, the rarity of the cells displaying template strand segregation, and alternative interpretations of experiments involving single labels or different types of labels to follow template strands. Using sequential pulses of halogenated thymidine analogs (bromodeoxyuridine [BrdU], chlorodeoxyuridine [CldU], and iododeoxyuridine [IdU]), and analyzing stem cell progeny during induced regeneration in vivo, we observed extraordinarily high frequencies of segregation of older and younger template strands during a period of proliferative expansion of muscle stem cells. Furthermore, template strand co-segregation was strongly associated with asymmetric cell divisions yielding daughters with divergent fates. Daughter cells inheriting the older templates retained the more immature phenotype, whereas daughters inheriting the newer templates acquired a more differentiated phenotype. These data provide compelling evidence of template strand co-segregation based on template age and associated with cell fate determination, suggest that template strand age is monitored during stem cell lineage progression, and raise important caveats for the interpretation of label-retaining cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050102

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asymmetric chromosome segregation occurs in MuSCs, ISCs, and NSCs.

    “There is mounting evidence of asymmetric chromosome segregation in stem cells such as MuSCs17,18,129, ISCs20,130,131 and NSCs132.”

    From Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence (2013) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conboy, M. J., Karasov, A. O., & Rando, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Rando, Thomas A
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
e102
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W1993755388
Cited by
287
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 38
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
asymmetric cell division, stem cell self-renewal, muscle stem cells, cell fate determination, label-retaining cells, bromodeoxyuridine, iododeoxyuridine
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Cell Differentiation, Cell Division, Deoxyuridine, DNA Replication, Idoxuridine, Muscles, Regeneration, Stem Cells, Chromosome Segregation, Satellite Cells, Skeletal Muscle, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review