Cited by 163Risk Perception and ManagementInfluenza Virus Research StudiesCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Situational Awareness and Health Protective Responses to Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Liao, Qiuyan, Cowling, Benjamin, Lam, Wing Tak, Ng, Man Wai, Fielding, Richard·2010·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether information sources influence health protective behaviours during influenza pandemics or other emerging infectious disease epidemics is uncertain. METHODOLOGY: Data from cross-sectional telephone interviews of 1,001 Hong Kong adults in June, 2009 were tested against theory and data-derived hypothesized associations between trust in (formal/informal) information, understanding, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility and worry, and hand hygiene and social distancing using Structural Equation Modelling with multigroup comparisons. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Trust in formal (government/media) information about influenza was associated with greater reported understanding of A/H1N1 cause (β = 0.36) and A/H1N1 prevention self-efficacy (β = 0.25), which in turn were associated with more hand hygiene (β = 0.19 and β = 0.23, respectively). Trust in informal (interpersonal) information was negatively associated with perceived personal A/H1N1 susceptibility (β = -0.21), which was negatively associated with perceived self-efficacy (β = -0.42) but positively associated with influenza worry (β = 0.44). Trust in informal information was positively associated with influenza worry (β = 0.16) which was in turn associated with greater social distancing (β = 0.36). Multigroup comparisons showed gender differences regarding paths from trust in formal information to understanding of A/H1N1 cause, trust in informal information to understanding of A/H1N1 cause, and understanding of A/H1N1 cause to perceived self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Trust in government/media information was more strongly associated with greater self-efficacy and handwashing, whereas trust in informal information was strongly associated with perceived health threat and avoidance behaviour. Risk communication should consider the effect of gender differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0013350

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Citizen journalists can positively impact health-related behaviors during a pandemic when the credibility of government and its performance is under question.

    “It was also noted that the perception of independent sources can have a positive impact on trust among critics of government and individuals without predispositions towards the source, implying that citizen journalists can positively impact health-related behaviors during a pandemic when the credibility of government and its performance is under question and is being challenged.”

    From Understanding media empowerment: citizen journalism in Palestine (2023) · cites this paper as Liao et al., 2010

    The Abstract (Principal Findings; page unavailable) links trust in informal interpersonal information with influenza worry, which was associated with greater social distancing. The paper does not study citizen journalists or show that they improve protective behaviour when government credibility or performance is challenged; its discussion of low confidence in formal information is hypothetical. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. [2]Grayson ML Melvani S Druce J Barr IG Ballard SA 2009 Efficacy of soap and water and alcohol-based hand-rub preparations against live H1N1 influenza virus on the hands of human volunteers. Clin Infect Dis 48 285 291 19115974
  2. [3]Cowling BJ Chan KH Fang VJ Cheng CK Fung RO 2009 Facemasks and hand hygiene to prevent influenza transmission in households: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 151 437 446 19652172
  3. [4]Wu JT Cowling BJ Lau EHY Ip DKM Ho LM 2010 School closure and mitigation of pandemic (H1N1) 2009, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 16 538 541 20202441 PMC3206396
  4. [8]Leung GM Lam TH Ho LM Ho SY Chan BH 2003 The impact of community psychological responses on outbreak control for severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. J Epidemiol Community Health 57 857 863 14600110 PMC1732323
  5. [9]Tang CS Wong CY 2003 An outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome: predictors of health behaviors and effect of community prevention measures in Hong Kong, China. Am J Public Health 93 1887 1888 14600058 PMC1448068
  6. [10]Tang CS Wong CY 2005 Psychosocial factors influencing the practice of preventive behaviors against the severe acute respiratory syndrome among older Chinese in Hong Kong. J Aging Health 17 490 506 16020576
  7. [11]Leppin A Aro AR 2009 Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research. Int J Behav Med 16 7 29 19214752 PMC7090865
  8. [13]Bish A Michie S 2010 Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. Br J Health Psychol doi: 10.1348/135910710X485826 PMC7185452 20109274 · DOI
  9. [20]Kraft P Rise J Sutton SR Røysamb E 2005 Perceived difficulty in the theory of planned behaviour: perceived behavioural control or affective attitude? Br J Soc Psychol 44 479 496 16238850
  10. [21]Jerant A Moore M Lorig K Franks P 2008 Perceived control moderated the self-efficacy-enhancing effects of a chronic illness self-management intervention. Chronic Illn 4 173 182 18796506
  11. [24]Kalichman SC Carey MP Johnson BT 1996 Prevention of sexually transmitted HIV infection: A meta-analytic review of the behavioral outcome literature. Ann Behav Med 18 6 24 24203638
  12. [25]Voeten HA de Zwart O Veldhuijzen IK Yuen C Jiang X 2009 Sources of information and health beliefs related to SARS and avian influenza among Chinese communities in the United Kingdom and The Netherlands, compared to the general population in these countries. Int J Behav Med 16 49 57 19184453 PMC7090907
  13. [27]Munro S Lewin S Swart T Volmink J 2007 A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS? BMC Pub Health 7 104 17561997 PMC1925084
  14. [28]Bean B Moore BM Sterner B Peterson LR Gerding DN 1982 Survival of influenza viruses on environmental surfaces. J Infect Dis 146 47 51 6282993
  15. [29]Slaughter L Keselman A Kushniruk A Patel VL 2005 A framework for capturing the interactions between laypersons' understanding of disease, information gathering behaviors, and actions taken during an epidemic. J Biomed Inform 298 313 16084472 PMC7185539
  16. [30]Calman KC 2002 Communication of risk: choice, consent, and trust. Lancet 360 166 168 12126841
  17. [32]Slovic P 1987 Perception of risk. Science 236 280 285 3563507
  18. [33]Slovic P 1999 Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Anal 19 689 701 10765431
  19. [34]Setbon M Raude J 2010 Factors in vaccination intention against the pandemic influenza A/H1N1. Eur J Public Health doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq054 PMC7314046 20444821 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [35]Liao Q Lam WW Jiang CQ Ho EY Liu YM 2009 Avian influenza risk perception and live poultry purchase in Guangzhou, China, 2006. Risk Anal 29 416 424 19076328
  21. [36]Brewer NT Weinstein ND Cuite CL 2004 Risk perception and their relation to risk behavior. Ann Behav Med 27 125 130 15026296
  22. [37]Liao QY Lam WWT Dang VT Jiang CQ Udomprasertgul V 2009 What causes H5N1 avian influenza? Lay perceptions of H5N1 etiology in South East and East Asia. J Pub Health 31 573 581 19423546
  23. [41]Chapman GB Coups EJ 2006 Emotions and preventive health behavior: worry, regret, and influenza vaccination. Health Psychol 25 82 90 16448301
  24. [42]Weinstein ND Kwitel A McCaul KD Magnan RE Gerrard M 2007 Risk perceptions: assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychol 26 146 151 17385965
  25. [47]Mahler HI Kulik JA 1998 Effects of preparatory videotapes on self-efficacy beliefs and recovery from coronary bypass surgery. Ann Behav Med 20 39 46 9755351
  26. [48]Katz S Feigenbaum A Pasternak S Vinker S 2005 An interactive course to enhance self-efficacy of family practitioners to treat obesity. BMC Med Educ 5 4 15679894 PMC548513
  27. [49]Rubin GJ Potts HWW Michie S 2010 The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technol Assess 14 183 266 20630124
  28. [50]Gattuso SM Litt MD Fitzgerald TE 1992 Coping with gastrointestinal endoscopy: self-efficacy enhancement and coping style. J Consult Clin Psychol 60 133 139 1556276
  29. [53]Beier ME Ackerman PL 2003 Determinants of health knowledge: an investigation of age, gender, abilities, personality, and interests. J Pers Soc Psychol 84 439 448 12585815
  30. [54]Sessa A Abbate R Di Giuseppe G Marinelli P Angelillo IF 2008 Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices about colorectal cancer among adults in an area of Southern Italy. BMC Cancer 8 171 18547435 PMC2474634
  31. [55]Kigongo Sekirime W Tamale J Lule JC Wabwire-Mangen F 2001 Knowledge, attitude and practice about sexually transmitted diseases among University students in Kampala. Afr Health Sci 1 16 22 12789128 PMC2704443
  32. [56]Helweg-Larsen M Shepperd JA 2001 Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 5 74 95
  33. [57]Liao Q Cowling BJ Lam WWT Fielding R 2010 Social-cognitive factors and personal hygiene practices to protect against influenzas: A Structural Equation Model comparing avian influenza A/H5N1 and 2009 pandemic A/H1N1 in Hong Kong. Int J Behav Med Under review PMC3088805 20949342

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, Q., Cowling, B., Lam, W. T., Ng, M. W., & Fielding, R.
Affiliations
University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Fielding, Richard
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2010-10-12
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
e13350
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070649162
Cited by
163
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Food and Health Bureau (U54 GM088558)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM088558)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM088558)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
pandemic influenza A(H1N1), preventive health behavior, situational awareness, trust in information sources, informal information, self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility, worry, hand hygiene, social distancing, risk communication, gender differences, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Awareness, Behavior Therapy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Influenza, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review