The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity
Open accessAbstract
The human genome is characterised by many runs of homozygous genotypes, where identical haplotypes were inherited from each parent. The length of each run is determined partly by the number of generations since the common ancestor: offspring of cousin marriages have long runs of homozygosity (ROH), while the numerous shorter tracts relate to shared ancestry tens and hundreds of generations ago. Human populations have experienced a wide range of demographic histories and hold diverse cultural attitudes to consanguinity. In a global population dataset, genome-wide analysis of long and shorter ROH allows categorisation of the mainly indigenous populations sampled here into four major groups in which the majority of the population are inferred to have: (a) recent parental relatedness (south and west Asians); (b) shared parental ancestry arising hundreds to thousands of years ago through long term isolation and restricted effective population size (N(e)), but little recent inbreeding (Oceanians); (c) both ancient and recent parental relatedness (Native Americans); and (d) only the background level of shared ancestry relating to continental N(e) (predominantly urban Europeans and East Asians; lowest of all in sub-Saharan African agriculturalists), and the occasional cryptically inbred individual. Moreover, individuals can be positioned along axes representing this demographic historic space. Long runs of homozygosity are therefore a globally widespread and under-appreciated characteristic of our genomes, which record past consanguinity and population isolation and provide a distinctive record of the demographic history of an individual's ancestors. Individual ROH measures will also allow quantification of the disease risk arising from polygenic recessive effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.
Purcell, S., Neale, B., Todd-Brown, K., Thomas, L., Ferreira, M. A. R., Bender, D., Maller, J., Sklar, P., de Bakker, P. I. W., Daly, M. J., et al. (2007) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/519795 · Cited by 34,089
A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs
The International HapMap Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06258 · Cited by 4,438
Keinan, A., Mullikin, J. C., Patterson, N., & Reich, D. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2116 · Cited by 272
The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan.
HUSSAIN, R., & BITTLES, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Biosocial Science · doi:10.1017/s0021932098002612 · Cited by 262
Quantification of homozygosity in consanguineous individuals with autosomal recessive disease
Woods, C. G., Cox, J., Springell, K., Hampshire, D. J., Mohamed, M. D., McKibbin, M., Stern, R., Raymond, F. L., Sandford, R., Malik Sharif, S., et al. (2006) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/503875 · Cited by 262
Cited by
The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains
Prüfer, K., Racimo, F., Patterson, N., Jay, F., Sankararaman, S., Sawyer, S., Heinze, A., Renaud, G., Sudmant, P. H., de Filippo, C., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12886 · Cited by 2,254
A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic denisovan individual
Meyer, M., Kircher, M., Gansauge, M.-T., Li, H., Racimo, F., Mallick, S., Schraiber, J. G., Jay, F., Prüfer, K., de Filippo, C., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1224344 · Cited by 1,967
Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture
Ceballos, F. C., Joshi, P. K., Clark, D. W., Ramsay, M., & Wilson, J. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.109 · Cited by 1,006
Self-citationDeterminants of genetic diversity
Ellegren, H., & Galtier, N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.58 · Cited by 874
Upper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians
Jones, E. R., Gonzalez-Fortes, G., Connell, S., Siska, V., Eriksson, A., Martiniano, R., McLaughlin, R. L., Gallego Llorente, M., Cassidy, L. M., Gamba, C., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9912 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirin, M., McQuillan, R., Franklin, C. S., Campbell, H., McKeigue, P. M., & Wilson, J. F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-11-15
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e13996
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055485782
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0013996
- The paper
- Kirin, M., McQuillan, R., Franklin, C. S., Campbell, H., McKeigue, P. M., & Wilson, J. F. (2010). Genomic Runs of Homozygosity Record Population History and Consanguinity. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.