The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Markers in Ovarian Cancer Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Plasticity
Open accessAbstract
In our studies of ovarian cancer cells we have identified subpopulations of cells that are in a transitory E/M hybrid stage, i.e. cells that simultaneously express epithelial and mesenchymal markers. E/M cells are not homogenous but, in vitro and in vivo, contain subsets that can be distinguished based on a number of phenotypic features, including the subcellular localization of E-cadherin, and the expression levels of Tie2, CD133, and CD44. A cellular subset (E/M-MP) (membrane E-cadherin(low)/cytoplasmic E-cadherin(high)/CD133(high), CD44(high), Tie2(low)) is highly enriched for tumor-forming cells and displays features which are generally associated with cancer stem cells. Our data suggest that E/M-MP cells are able to differentiate into different lineages under certain conditions, and have the capacity for self-renewal, i.e. to maintain a subset of undifferentiated E/M-MP cells during differentiation. Trans-differentiation of E/M-MP cells into mesenchymal or epithelial cells is associated with a loss of stem cell markers and tumorigenicity. In vivo xenograft tumor growth is driven by E/M-MP cells, which give rise to epithelial ovarian cancer cells. In contrast, in vitro, we found that E/M-MP cells differentiate into mesenchymal cells, in a process that involves pathways associated with an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. We also detected phenotypic plasticity that was dependent on external factors such as stress created by starvation or contact with either epithelial or mesenchymal cells in co-cultures. Our study provides a better understanding of the phenotypic complexity of ovarian cancer and has implications for ovarian cancer therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turley, E. A., Veiseh, M., Radisky, D. C., & Bissell, M. J. (2008) · Nature Clinical Practice Oncology · doi:10.1038/ncponc1089 · Cited by 253
Cited by
McLean, K., Gong, Y., Choi, Y., Deng, N., Yang, K., Bai, S., Cabrera, L., Keller, E., McCauley, L., Cho, K. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci45273 · Cited by 380
Cancer Stem Cells and Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer Metastasis
Celià-Terrassa, T., & Jolly, M. K. (2020) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a036905 · Cited by 163
Complex Determinants of Epithelial: Mesenchymal Phenotypic Plasticity in Ovarian Cancer
Klymenko, Y., Kim, O., & Stack, M. (2017) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers9080104 · Cited by 99
Regulation of Stem Cell Plasticity: Mechanisms and Relevance to Tissue Biology and Cancer
Strauss, R., Hamerlik, P., Lieber, A., & Bartek, J. (2012) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2012.2 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Strauss, R., Li, Z.-Y., Liu, Y., Beyer, I., Persson, J., Sova, P., Möller, T., Pesonen, S., Hemminki, A., Hamerlik, P., Drescher, C., Urban, N., Bartek, J., & Lieber, A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-01-14
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e16186
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019237060
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Markers in Ovarian Cancer Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Plasticity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0016186
- The paper
- Strauss, R., Li, Z.-Y., Liu, Y., Beyer, I., Persson, J., Sova, P., Möller, T., Pesonen, S., Hemminki, A., Hamerlik, P., Drescher, C., Urban, N., Bartek, J., & Lieber, A. (2011). Analysis of Epithelial and Mesenchymal Markers in Ovarian Cancer Reveals Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Plasticity. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.