Who's afraid of the boss: cultural differences in social hierarchies modulate self-face recognition in Chinese and Americans
Open accessAbstract
Human adults typically respond faster to their own face than to the faces of others. However, in Chinese participants, this self-face advantage is lost in the presence of one's supervisor, and they respond faster to their supervisor's face than to their own. While this "boss effect" suggests a strong modulation of self-processing in the presence of influential social superiors, the current study examined whether this effect was true across cultures. Given the wealth of literature on cultural differences between collectivist, interdependent versus individualistic, independent self-construals, we hypothesized that the boss effect might be weaker in independent than interdependent cultures. Twenty European American college students were asked to identify orientations of their own face or their supervisors' face. We found that European Americans, unlike Chinese participants, did not show a "boss effect" and maintained the self-face advantage even in the presence of their supervisor's face. Interestingly, however, their self-face advantage decreased as their ratings of their boss's perceived social status increased, suggesting that self-processing in Americans is influenced more by one's social status than by one's hierarchical position as a social superior. In addition, when their boss's face was presented with a labmate's face, American participants responded faster to the boss's face, indicating that the boss may represent general social dominance rather than a direct negative threat to oneself, in more independent cultures. Altogether, these results demonstrate a strong cultural modulation of self-processing in social contexts and suggest that the very concept of social positions, such as a boss, may hold markedly different meanings to the self across Western and East Asian cultures.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Western individuals maintain a self-bias in identical circumstances.
“Western individuals, however, maintain a self-bias in identical circumstances.”
From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Liew et al., 2011
Chinese individuals show a reversal of the self-bias in the presence of a supervisor, with reaction times becoming faster for the face of the social superior than the self-face.
“a recent study has suggested that Chinese individuals show a reversal of the self-bias in the presence of a supervisor, with reaction times becoming faster for the face of the social superior than the self-face (Liew et al., 2011).”
From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Liew et al., 2011
Westerners show a greater self-bias on self-other face recognition tasks than East Asian individuals.
“Indeed, Westerners show a greater self-bias on such tasks than East Asian individuals.”
From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Liew et al., 2011
Self-other face recognition has been shown to be different across cultures.
“self-other face recognition has been shown to be different across cultures (Liew et al., 2011; Sui et al., 2009).”
From The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition (2014) · cites this paper as Liew et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 92
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [23]Chen G Chung J 1994 Confucian impact on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly 42 93 105
- Authors
- Liew, S.-L., Ma, Y., Han, S., & Aziz-Zadeh, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liew, Sook-Lei
- Han, Shihui
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-02-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e16901
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3040187
- OpenAlex
- W2079075107
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Southern California
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (973 Program, 30910103901, 30630025, 30828012)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (973 Program 2010CB833903, 2010CB833903.)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- self-face recognition, social hierarchy, cultural differences, self-construal, social status, social dominance, China–United States comparison, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adult, China, Culture, Face, Fear, Female, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Self Concept, United States, Work, Recognition, Psychology, White People, Asian People, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review