The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acoustic Noise Induces Attention Shifts and Reduces Foraging Performance in Three-Spined Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
Open accessAbstract
Acoustic noise is known to have a variety of detrimental effects on many animals, including humans, but surprisingly little is known about its impacts on foraging behaviour, despite the obvious potential consequences for survival and reproductive success. We therefore exposed captive three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to brief and prolonged noise to investigate how foraging performance is affected by the addition of acoustic noise to an otherwise quiet environment. The addition of noise induced only mild fear-related behaviours--there was an increase in startle responses, but no change in the time spent freezing or hiding compared to a silent control--and thus had no significant impact on the total amount of food eaten. However, there was strong evidence that the addition of noise increased food-handling errors and reduced discrimination between food and non-food items, results that are consistent with a shift in attention. Consequently, noise resulted in decreased foraging efficiency, with more attacks needed to consume the same number of prey items. Our results suggest that acoustic noise has the potential to influence a whole host of everyday activities through effects on attention, and that even very brief noise exposure can cause functionally significant impacts, emphasising the threat posed by ever-increasing levels of anthropogenic noise in the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus
Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-092 · Cited by 8,196
The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine
McEwen, B. S., & Wingfield, J. C. (2003) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0018-506x(02)00024-7 · Cited by 3,302 · cited 1×
“First, noise might act as a stressor with suites of behaviour changing as part of an allostatic response to an environmental event [10,17–19], affecting the intensity, duration or frequency of certain activities.”
BackgroundCognition, evolution, and behavior
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-5652 · Cited by 1,457
Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health
Stansfeld, S. A., & Matheson, M. P. (2003) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldg033 · Cited by 1,129
The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms
Barber, J. R., Crooks, K. R., & Fristrup, K. M. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.002 · Cited by 1,005
The Role of Oxidative Stress in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss
Henderson, D., Bielefeld, E. C., Harris, K. C., & Hu, B. H. (2006) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000191942.36672.f3 · Cited by 879
Stress and Animal Welfare: Key Issues in the Biology of Humans and Other Animals
Broom, D. M., & Johnson, K. G. (2019) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32153-6 · Cited by 786
Broom, D. M., & Johnson, K. G. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0980-2 · Cited by 785
Why behavioural responses may not reflect the population consequences of human disturbance
Gill, J. A., Norris, K., & Sutherland, W. J. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00002-1 · Cited by 644
Cited by
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity
Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., et al. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12480 · Cited by 3,645
Kight, C. R., & Swaddle, J. P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x · Cited by 622
An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes
Popper, A. N., & Hawkins, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.13948 · Cited by 445
Aquatic noise pollution: implications for individuals, populations, and ecosystems
Kunc, H. P., McLaughlin, K. E., & Schmidt, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0839 · Cited by 265
Halfwerk, W., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2015) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.1051 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Purser, J., & Radford, A. N.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-02-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e17478
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009435011
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acoustic Noise Induces Attention Shifts and Reduces Foraging Performance in Three-Spined Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0017478
- The paper
- Purser, J., & Radford, A. N. (2011). Acoustic Noise Induces Attention Shifts and Reduces Foraging Performance in Three-Spined Sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017478
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.