Cited by 342Memory and Neural MechanismsPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Cross-species affective neuroscience decoding of the primal affective experiences of humans and related animals

Open access
Panksepp, Jaak·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The issue of whether other animals have internally felt experiences has vexed animal behavioral science since its inception. Although most investigators remain agnostic on such contentious issues, there is now abundant experimental evidence indicating that all mammals have negatively and positively-valenced emotional networks concentrated in homologous brain regions that mediate affective experiences when animals are emotionally aroused. That is what the neuroscientific evidence indicates. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The relevant lines of evidence are as follows: 1) It is easy to elicit powerful unconditioned emotional responses using localized electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB); these effects are concentrated in ancient subcortical brain regions. Seven types of emotional arousals have been described; using a special capitalized nomenclature for such primary process emotional systems, they are SEEKING, RAGE, FEAR, LUST, CARE, PANIC/GRIEF and PLAY. 2) These brain circuits are situated in homologous subcortical brain regions in all vertebrates tested. Thus, if one activates FEAR arousal circuits in rats, cats or primates, all exhibit similar fear responses. 3) All primary-process emotional-instinctual urges, even ones as complex as social PLAY, remain intact after radical neo-decortication early in life; thus, the neocortex is not essential for the generation of primary-process emotionality. 4) Using diverse measures, one can demonstrate that animals like and dislike ESB of brain regions that evoke unconditioned instinctual emotional behaviors: Such ESBs can serve as 'rewards' and 'punishments' in diverse approach and escape/avoidance learning tasks. 5) Comparable ESB of human brains yield comparable affective experiences. Thus, robust evidence indicates that raw primary-process (i.e., instinctual, unconditioned) emotional behaviors and feelings emanate from homologous brain functions in all mammals (see Appendix S1), which are regulated by higher brain regions. Such findings suggest nested-hierarchies of BrainMind affective processing, with primal emotional functions being foundational for secondary-process learning and memory mechanisms, which interface with tertiary-process cognitive-thoughtful functions of the BrainMind.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0021236

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models distinguish between different affective and motivational systems such as panic and care systems that rely on distinct brain networks and neurotransmitter systems.

    “Furthermore, animal models distinguish between different affective and motivational systems such as panic and care systems that rely on distinct brain networks and neurotransmitter systems (Panksepp, 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 342

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [26]Panksepp J 1985 Mood changes. Vinken P Bruyn G Klawans H Handbook of clinical neurology Amsterdam Elsevier 271 285
  2. [54]Panksepp J 1981 Brain opioids: A neurochemical substrate for narcotic and social dependence. Cooper S Progress in theory in psychopharmacology London Academic Press 149 175
  3. [57]Panksepp J 2008 Simulating the primal affective mentalities of the mammalian brain: A fugue on the emotional feelings of mental life and implications for AI-robotics. Dietrich D Fodor G Zucker G Bruckner D Simulating the mind: A technical neuropsychoanalytic approach Vienna/New York Springer 149 177

Authors
Panksepp, J.
Affiliations
Washington State University (US)
Corresponding author
Panksepp, Jaak
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-09-07
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e21236
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131635822
Cited by
342
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Hope for Depression Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
animal sentience, emotional experience, electrical brain stimulation, fear, play, seeking, RAGE, lust, care, reward and punishment
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Neurosciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review