Cited by 676Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEmpathy and Medical EducationAction Observation and Synchronization

Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training

Open access
Klimecki, Olga M., Leiberg, Susanne, Ricard, Matthieu, Singer, Tania·2014·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Although empathy is crucial for successful social interactions, excessive sharing of others' negative emotions may be maladaptive and constitute a source of burnout. To investigate functional neural plasticity underlying the augmentation of empathy and to test the counteracting potential of compassion, one group of participants was first trained in empathic resonance and subsequently in compassion. In response to videos depicting human suffering, empathy training, but not memory training (control group), increased negative affect and brain activations in anterior insula and anterior midcingulate cortex-brain regions previously associated with empathy for pain. In contrast, subsequent compassion training could reverse the increase in negative effect and, in contrast, augment self-reports of positive affect. In addition, compassion training increased activations in a non-overlapping brain network spanning ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and medial orbitofrontal cortex. We conclude that training compassion may reflect a new coping strategy to overcome empathic distress and strengthen resilience.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a longitudinal fMRI training study with an active memory control, empathy training increased negative affect and empathy-related insula/aMCC activations, whereas subsequent compassion training reversed negative affect, increased positive affect, and engaged a non-overlapping mOFC/pACC/ventral striatum network. The authors conclude that compassion training may counteract empathic distress and strengthen resilience.

Key findings

  • Empathy training increased self-reported negative affect (t24 = 3.5, P < 0.01) and empathy (t24 = 4.66, P < 0.001); subsequent compassion training decreased negative affect (t24 = 3.04, P < 0.01) and increased positive affect (t24 = 4.25, P < 0.001).
  • In response to high-emotion videos, empathy training versus memory training increased activations in insula, aMCC, DLPFC, posterior putamen, pallidum, and head of caudate; activation changes overlapped with meta-analytic empathy-for-pain findings in aMCC and left AI.
  • Compassion training versus memory training increased activations in mOFC, pregenual ACC, ventral striatum, and right middle frontal gyrus for high-emotion videos; conjunction analyses showed no significant overlap with empathy-training changes.
  • Memory control training improved correctly remembered words and words remembered in the correct position from Pre to Post1 (both t ≥ 4.37, both P < 0.001) and from Post1 to Post2 (both t ≥ 2.35, both P < 0.05), while memory performance did not change in the affect group (all t ≤ 1.35, all P ≥ 0.19).

Methods

  • Prospective longitudinal training study: affect group (n = 25 completers of 30; age 25.88 ± 4.32 years) first received empathy training then compassion training; memory control group (n = 28 of 33; age 22.89 ± 4.02 years) received two memory trainings. The sample was restricted to female participants, and groups were recruited and tested sequentially.
  • Participants underwent fMRI three times (Pre, Post1, Post2) during a socio-affective video task containing 12 high-emotion and 12 low-emotion videos per parallel set, with ratings of empathy, positive affect, and negative affect; a separate memory task used matched lists of 34 words.
  • Analyses used repeated-measures MANOVA/ANOVA with age and depression scores as covariates; whole-brain event-related fMRI at P < 0.05 FWE cluster-level correction; repeated-measures ANOVAs with change (Pre–Post1, Post1–Post2), video type, and group; and conjunction analyses.

Limitations

  • Stated: the study only focused on females, so future studies are needed to test whether effects generalize to males; the intervention was probably too short to reveal a robust impact of inter-individual practice differences on neural and experiential changes.
  • Stated: groups were recruited and tested sequentially due to temporal and infrastructural constraints; the memory group had selective dropout with higher Beck Depression Inventory scores (dropouts: mean = 7.4, s.d. = 5.6; completers: mean = 3.11, s.d. = 3.49; t31 = 2.31, P < 0.05) and age differences, which were addressed by including age and depression scores as covariates.
  • Evident from the text: there was no follow-up beyond Post2; practice duration showed no significant relation with affect changes and did not parametrically modulate neural changes; positive-affect-related neural correlations after empathy training were not significant.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nst060

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 49 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Empathy training increased empathy ratings in response to videos depicting human suffering.

    “empathy training increased negative affect (t 24 ¼ 3.5, P < 0.01) and empathy (t 24 ¼ 4.66, P < 0.001).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS Socio-affective video task · plain
      “training empathy led to increases in subjective reports of negative affect and empathy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Compared with low-emotion videos, high-emotion videos elicited more negative affect.

    “compared with LE videos, HE videos elicited more negative affect and empathy and less positive affect (all t 52 !15.82, all P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Empathy training increased negative affect in response to videos depicting human suffering, compared with memory training.

    “empathy training, but not memory training (control group), increased negative affect and brain activations in anterior insula and anterior midcingulate cortexbrain regions previously associated with empathy for pain.”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS Socio-affective video task · plain
      “empathy training increased negative affect (t 24 ¼ 3.5, P < 0.01) and empathy (t 24 ¼ 4.66, P < 0.001).”
    • Also stated in: § RESULTS Socio-affective video task · plain
      “training empathy led to increases in subjective reports of negative affect and empathy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Compassion training increased activations in a nonoverlapping brain network spanning ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and medial orbitofrontal cortex.

    “compassion training increased activations in a nonoverlapping brain network spanning ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and medial orbitofrontal cortex.”
    • Also stated in: § Functional imaging changes · plain
      “None of the con- junctions was significant, underlining that patterns of induced functional plasticity after empathy and compassion training were dis- tinct and non-overlapping.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Compared with low-emotion videos, high-emotion videos elicited more empathy.

    “compared with LE videos, HE videos elicited more negative affect and empathy and less positive affect (all t 52 !15.82, all P < 0.001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 15
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compassion training decreased negative affect back to baseline levels and increased positive affect.

    “Importantly, compassion training reversed these effects: it decreased negative affect back to baseline levels and increased positive affect.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “compassion training counteracted this effect: it increased positive affect and decreased negative affect back to baseline levels.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Positive affect only increased after compassion training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The prior empathy training in the affect group did not confound the effects attributed to subsequent compassion training.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    None of the conjunction analyses of equivalent empathy- and compassion-related contrasts was significant, indicating that patterns of induced functional plasticity after empathy and compassion training were distinct and non-overlapping.

    “None of the con- junctions was significant, underlining that patterns of induced functional plasticity after empathy and compassion training were dis- tinct and non-overlapping.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Analyses of subjective ratings revealed that empathy training led to an increase in empathy and negative affect in response to both LE and HE videos.

    “The analyses of subjective ratings revealed that empathy training led to an increase in empathy and negative affect in response to both, LE and HE videos.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Empathy training, but not memory training, increased activations in insula, temporal gyrus, operculum, posterior putamen, pallidum, thalamus and head of caudate.

    “Empathy training, but not memory training [Empathy (Á1 LE and Á1 HE) > Memory (Á1 LE and Á1 HE)], increased activations in insula, temporal gyrus, operculum, posterior putamen, pallidum, thalamus and head of caudate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No significant effects were found for changes in empathy ratings or positive affect ratings after compassion training.

    “No significant effects were found for changes in empathy ratings or positive affect ratings after compassion training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Empathy training, but not memory training, induced functional plasticity in a network spanning insula, aMCC, temporal gyrus, operculum, DLPFC, posterior putamen, pallidum and head of caudate.

    “In addition, watching others' suffering after empathy training was associated with activations in a network spanning insula, aMCC, temporal gyrus, DLPFC, operculum and parts of basal ganglia.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “On the neural level, we obtained evidence that short-term empathy training, but not memory training, induced functional plasticity in a network spanning insula, aMCC, temporal gyrus, operculum, DLPFC, posterior putamen, pallidum and head of caudate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A short-term training in empathy increased empathic responses and negative affect in response to others' distress.

    “a short-term training in empathy increased empathic responses and negative affect in response to others' distress.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “Self-reported empathy and negative affect significantly increased after empathy training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Training empathy in this study increased activations in both aMCC and DLPFC.

    “In keeping with this structural connectivity, training empathy in this study increased activations in both aMCC and DLPFC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Memory, but not affect training, improved the number of correctly remembered words and the number of words remembered in the correct position.

    “Memory, but not affect training, improved the number of correctly remembered words and the number of words remembered in the correct position.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Affiliative memories in mammals rely on a circuitry that includes medial orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum and ventral tegmental area.

    “affiliative memories in mammals seem to rely on a circuitry that includes mOFC, ventral striatum and ventral tegmental area (Depue and Morrone-Strupinsky, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Depue and Morrone-Strupinsky, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Training compassion may reflect a new coping strategy to overcome empathic distress and strengthen resilience.

    “We conclude that training compassion may reflect a new coping strategy to overcome empathic distress and strengthen resilience.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    No other selective dropouts were observed in the memory control group and no selective dropouts occurred in the affect group.

    “No other selective dropouts were observed in the memory control group and no selective dropouts occurred in the affect group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Participants saw one of three parallel video sets matched for valence, arousal and empathy at Pre, Post1 and Post2 to avoid habituation and repetition.

    “To avoid habituation and repetition, participants saw one of three parallel video sets matched for valence, arousal and empathy at Pre, Post1 and Post2, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Empathy for pain crucially involves anterior insula and anterior midcingulate cortex.

    “Two recent cross-sectional meta-analyses suggest that empathy for pain crucially involves anterior insula (AI) and anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC) (Fan et al., 2011;Lamm et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fan et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lamm et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Negative affect often covaries with activations in anterior insula and anterior midcingulate cortex.

    “negative affect often covaries with activations in AI and aMCC (Lamm et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lamm et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Training compassion can foster positive emotions.

    “positive emotions (Klimecki et al., 2012)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Training empathy not only induced a stronger sharing of painful and distressing experiences, but also increased susceptibility to feel negative affect in response to everyday life situations.

    “This suggests that training empathy not only induced a stronger sharing of painful and distressing experiences, but also increased the susceptibility to feel negative affect in response to everyday life situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Acknowledging the negative experience of others rather than suppressing it may be a crucial prerequisite for the development of prosocial motivation and helping behavior.

    “Furthermore, acknowledging the negative experience of others rather than suppressing it may be a crucial prerequisite for the development of prosocial motivation and helping behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Activations in prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum have been related more specifically to maternal affiliation, as well as to maternal and romantic love.

    “In addition to this convergence with previous neuroimaging findings on positive affect and reward, activations in prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum have been related more specifically to maternal affiliation (Strathearn et al., 2009), as well as to maternal and romantic love (Bartels and Zeki, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Strathearn et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bartels and Zeki, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Activation in AI and aMCC has repeatedly been observed to covary with negative affect ratings, both during self-experienced pain and when observing others suffering.

    “Moreover, activation in AI and aMCC has repeatedly been observed to covary with negative affect ratings, both during self-experienced pain and when observing others suffering (Jackson et al., 2005;Cheng et al., 2007;Lamm et al., 2007;Saarela et al., 2007;Singer et al., 2008;Akitsuki and Decety, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jackson et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Cheng et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lamm et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The frequency of helping behavior can be increased with a similar short-term compassion training.

    “Accordingly, it has recently been shown that the frequency of helping behavior can indeed be increased with a similar short-term compassion training (Leiberg et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leiberg et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The generation of compassion focuses on strengthening positive affect, while not ignoring the presence of suffering or changing the negative reality.

    “Thus, the generation of compassion focuses on strengthening positive affect, while not ignoring the presence of suffering or changing the negative reality.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Our results suggest that empathy and compassion indeed rely on antagonistic affective systems and that even short-term training of compassion has the potential to counteract empathic distress.

    “In line with this notion, our results suggest that empathy and compassion indeed rely on antagonistic affective systems and that even short-term training of compassion has the potential to counteract empathic distress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The prior empathy training in the affect group did not confound the effects attributed to subsequent compassion training.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Studies in rodents and other mammals suggest that the formation of affiliative memories relies on a circuitry comprising mOFC, ventral striatum and ventral tegmental area.

    “Similarly, studies in rodents and other mammals suggest that the formation of affiliative memories relies on a circuitry comprising mOFC, ventral striatum and ventral tegmental area (Depue and Morrone-Strupinsky, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Depue and Morrone-Strupinsky, 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The distinction between empathy and compassion networks is paralleled by recent neuroscientific evidence that social connectedness is associated with activations in ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum, whereas social disconnection is associated with activations in AI and dorsal ACC.

    “Interestingly, this distinction is paralleled by recent neuroscientific evidence which indicates that social connectedness is typically associated with activations in brain regions that comprise ventromedial prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum, whereas social disconnection is rather associated with activations in AI and dorsal ACC (for review, see Eisenberger and Cole, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eisenberger and Cole, 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    mOFC, pACC and ventral striatum activations have been shown to be centrally implicated in reward processing as well as in the experience of pleasure and positive affect.

    “In general, mOFC, pACC and ventral striatum activations have been shown to be centrally implicated in reward processing (Haber and Knutson, 2010) as well as in the experience of pleasure and positive affect (Kringelbach and Berridge, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Haber and Knutson, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kringelbach and Berridge, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Viewing sad facial expressions with a compassionate stance was observed to activate ventral striatum and VTA/SN.

    “For example, viewing sad facial expressions with a compassionate stance was observed to activate ventral striatum and VTA/SN (Kim et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kim et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Activations in AI and aMCC are parametrically modulated by individual differences in empathic experiences for distressing videos in the SoVT.

    “Finally, we previously observed that activations in AI and aMCC are parametrically modulated by individual differences in empathic experiences for distressing videos in the SoVT (Klimecki et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Klimecki et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results align with and extend previous cross-sectional meta-analytic findings on a crucial role of insula and aMCC in empathy for pain.

    “These results align with and extend previous crosssectional meta-analytic findings on a crucial role of insula and aMCC in empathy for pain (Fan et al., 2011;Lamm et al., 2011)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fan et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lamm et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Training two seemingly similar social emotions altered brain activation in non-overlapping neural networks and changed affective responses of opposing valence.

    “More importantly, we could show that training two seemingly similar social emotions altered brain activation in non-overlapping neural networks and changed affective responses of opposing valence.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The comparison of cingulate cortex locations from fMRI studies on reward processing revealed a more anterior activation, which converges with the present observation of pACC involvement in compassion.

    “The comparison of cingulate cortex locations from fMRI studies on reward processing revealed a more anterior activation (Beckmann et al., 2009), which converges with the present observation of pACC involvement in compassion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beckmann et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A different meta-analysis reported that aMCC is implicated in processing pain, conflict monitoring and error detection.

    “Converging results were provided by a different meta-analysis (Beckmann et al., 2009) which reported that aMCC is implicated in processing pain, conflict monitoring and error detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beckmann et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The video material remained equally distressing across the training time points.

    “Remarkably, the increase in positive affect occurred even though participants were still exposed to equally distressing video material.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The prior empathy training in the affect group did not confound the effects attributed to subsequent compassion training.

    “This longitudinal training study consisted of two groups: the affect group, which first received empathy training and subsequently compassion training, and the memory control group, which received two memory trainings.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians themselves are found to experience less distress and greater reward.

    “Clinicians themselves are also found to experience less distress and greater reward [3–5].”

    From Interventions to address empathy-based stress in mental health workers: A scoping review and research agenda (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results and Discussion report that compassion training reduced negative affect, increased positive affect, and increased activation in brain regions associated with reward. But the Methods describe female participants recruited for mental-training studies, not clinicians; the Discussion presents health-care applications as a future possibility. The paper therefore does not establish that clinicians themselves experienced these effects. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes.

    “while compassion (affect-sharing with motivation to help) may strengthen personal resources and promote positive outcomes (e.g., Klimecki et al., 2014; Singer & Klimecki, 2014).”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Meditation on Empathy, Compassion, and Prosocial Behaviors (2018) · cites this paper as Klimecki et al., 2014

    The Introduction says compassion is concern for others’ suffering associated with motivation to help, and describes it as a promising way to strengthen personal resources. The Discussion reports increased positive affect after compassion training. However, the paper characterizes sharing others’ painful feelings as empathy, which it distinguishes from compassion; it does not support the parenthetical definition of compassion as affect-sharing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the same experiment, Loving-kindness meditation training could reverse these effects by activating neural networks related to positive emotions, affiliation and love, together with an augmentation of positive feelings.

    “Conversely, the Loving-kindness meditation training could reverse these effects by activating neural networks related to positive emotions, affiliation and love, together with an augmentation of positive feelings.”
  • Empathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior.

    “Empathy (affect-sharing) may increase personal distress and reduce pro-social behavior”
  • The socio-affective video task has previously been successfully used in Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.

    “This task has previously been successfully used in previous Compassion research and is optimized to elicit extended negative affect of a social nature.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Salzberg, 2002, Loving-kindness: The Revolutionary Art of Happiness

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2013-05-09
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
873-879
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2147390495
Cited by
676
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 3
FWCI
36.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Universität Zürich
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (205557)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
compassion training, empathy training, empathic distress, burnout, anterior insula, anterior midcingulate cortex, empathy for pain, ventral striatum, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, positive affect, negative affect, resilience, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Brain, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Female, Humans, Learning, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Neuronal Plasticity, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Social Perception, Video Recording, Visual Perception, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review