Cited by 29Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

A maternal influence on Reading the Mind in the Eyes mediated by executive function: differential parental influences on full and half-siblings

Open access
Ragsdale, Gillian, Foley, Robert A.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parent-of-origin effects have been found to influence the mammalian brain and cognition and have been specifically implicated in the development of human social cognition and theory of mind. The experimental design in this study was developed to detect parent-of-origin effects on theory of mind, as measured by the 'Reading the mind in the eyes' (Eyes) task. Eyes scores were also entered into a principal components analysis with measures of empathy, social skills and executive function, in order to determine what aspect of theory of mind Eyes is measuring. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Maternal and paternal influences on Eyes scores were compared using correlations between pairs of full (70 pairs), maternal (25 pairs) and paternal siblings (15 pairs). Structural equation modelling supported a maternal influence on Eyes scores over the normal range but not low-scoring outliers, and also a sex-specific influence on males acting to decrease male Eyes scores. It was not possible to differentiate between genetic and environmental influences in this particular sample because maternal siblings tended to be raised together while paternal siblings were raised apart. The principal components analysis found Eyes was associated with measures of executive function, principally behavioural inhibition and attention, rather than empathy or social skills. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In conclusion, the results suggest a maternal influence on Eye scores in the normal range and a sex-specific influence acting to reduce scores in males. This influence may act via aspects of executive function such as behavioural inhibition and attention. There may be different influences acting to produce the lowest Eyes scores which implies that the heratibility and/or maternal influence on poor theory of mind skills may be qualitatively different to the influence on the normal range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0023236

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. [1]Baron-Cohen S Wheelwright S Hill J Raste Y Plumb I 2001 The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42 2 241 251 11280420
  2. [4]Good CD Lawrence K Thomas NS Price CJ Ashburner J 2003 Dosage-sensitive X-linked locus influences the development of amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex, and fear recognition in humans. Brain 126 Pt 11 2431 2446 12958079
  3. [5]Elgar K Campbell R Skuse D 2002 Are you looking at me? Accuracy in processing line-of-sight in Turner syndrome. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B: Biological Science 269 1508 2415 2422 PMC1691184 12495483
  4. [6]Sabbagh MA Seamans EL 2008 Intergenerational transmission of theory-of-mind. Developmental Science 11 3 354 360 18466369
  5. [7]Wimmer H Perner J 1983 Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 13 1 103 28 6681741
  6. [8]Campbell R Lawrence K Mandy W Mitra C Jeyakuma L 2006 Meanings in motion and faces: Developmental associations between the processing of intention from geometrical animations and gaze detection accuracy. Development and Psychopathology 18 1 99 118 16478554
  7. [9]Blair RJR 2006 Fine cuts of empathy and the amygdala: dissociable deficits in psychopathy and autism. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology 61 1 157 170 18038346
  8. [10]Preston SD de Waal FBM 2002 Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 1 20 12625087
  9. [11]Viding E 2004 Annotation: understanding the development of psychopathy Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 45 8 1329 1337 15482494
  10. [13]Aboulafia-Brakha T Christe B Martory MD Annoni JM 2011 ToM tasks and executive functions: a systematic review of group studies in neurology. J Neuropsychol 5 Pt 1 39 55 21366886
  11. [14]Happe FG 1994 An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord 24 2 129 54 8040158
  12. [15]Baron-Cohen S O'Riordan M Stone V Jones R Plaisted K 1999 Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Autism Dev Disord 29 5 407 18 10587887
  13. [17]Torralva T Roca M Gleichgerrcht E Bekinschtein T Manes F 2009 A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia. Brain 132 Pt 5 1299 309 19336463
  14. [18]Ahmed FS Stephen Miller L 2010 Executive function mechanisms of ToM. J Autism Dev Disord 41 5 667 78 20811770
  15. [19]Brent E Rios P Happé F Charman T 2004 Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced ToM tasks. Autism 8 3 283 99 15358871
  16. [20]Bull R Phillips LH Conway CA 2007 The role of control functions in mentalizing: dual-task studies of theory of mind and executive function. Cognition 107 663 672 17765214
  17. [21]Dennis M Agostino A Roncadin C 2009 ToM depends on domain-general executive functions of working memory and cognitive inhibition in children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 7 835 847 19221924
  18. [23]German TP Hehman JA 2006 Representational and executive selection resources in ‘theory of mind’: evidence from compromised belief reasoning in old age. Cognition 101 129 152 16288734
  19. [24]Fine C Lumsden J Blair RJ 2001 Dissociation between ‘theory of mind’ and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain 124 Pt 2 287 98 11157556
  20. [25]Apperly IA Samson D Humphreys GW 2009 Studies of adults can inform accounts of theory of mind development. Dev Psychol 45 1 190 201 19210001
  21. [26]Grosbras MH Paus T 2006 Brain networks involved in viewing angry hands or faces. Cerebral Cortex 16 8 1087 1096 16221928
  22. [27]Gallese V 2003 The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36 171 180 14504450
  23. [28]Wicker B Keysers C Plailly J Royet JP Gallese V 2003 Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40 3 655 64 14642287
  24. [29]Panksepp J 1998 Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions Oxford University Press: New York, USA
  25. [30]Frith U Frith C 2003 Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, Biological Sciences 358 459 473 PMC1693139 12689373
  26. [31]Rizolatti G Craighero L 2004 The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27 169 192 15217330
  27. [32]Leslie KR Johnson-Frey SH Grafton ST 2004 Functional imagining of face and hand imitation: towards a motor theory of empathy. Neuroimage 21 2 601 607 14980562
  28. [33]Carr L Iacoboni M Dubeau MC Mazziotta JC Lenzi GL 2003 Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 100 9 5497 502 PMC154373 12682281
  29. [35]Hughes C Jaffee SR Happ F Taylor A Caspi A 2005 Origins of individual differences in theory of mind: from nature to nurture? Child Development 76 2 356 370 15784087
  30. [36]Anokhin AP Golosheykin S Heath AC 2010 Heritability of individual differences in cortical processing of facial affect. Behaviour Genetics 40 178 185 PMC3201789 20127403
  31. [37]Chakrabarti B Kent L Suckling J Bullmore ET Baron-Cohen S 2006 Variations in human cannabinoid receptor (CNR1) gene modulate striatal response to happy faces. European Journal of Neuroscience 23 1944 1948 16623851
  32. [38]Keverne EB Fundele R Narasimha M Barton SC Surani MA 1996 Genomic imprinting and the differential roles of parental genomes in brain development. Developmental Brain Research 92 91 100 8861727
  33. [39]Gregg C Zhang J Butler JE Haig D Dulac C 2010 Sex-specific parent-of-origin allelic expression in the mouse brain. Science 6 329 682 685 PMC2997643 20616234
  34. [42]Crews D 2011 Epigenetic modifications of brain and behavior: theory and practice. Horm Behav 59 3 393 8 20633562 PMC3401366
  35. [43]Nugent BM McCarthy MM 2011 Epigenetic underpinnings of developmental sex differences in the brain. Neuroendocrinology 93 3 150 8 21411982 PMC7068790
  36. [44]Roth TL Sweatt JD 2011 Annual Research Review: Epigenetic mechanisms and environmental shaping of the brain during sensitive periods of development. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52 4 398 408 20626526 PMC2965301
  37. [45]Nelson ED Monteggia LM 2011 Epigenetics in the mature mammalian brain: Effects on behavior and synaptic transmission. Neurobiol Learn Mem 96 1 53 60 21396474 PMC3463371
  38. [46]Domes G Heinrichs M Michel A Berger C Herpertz SC 2006 Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry 61 6 731 733 17137561
  39. [47]Rodrigues SM Saslow LR Garcia N John OP Keltner D 2009 Oxytocin receptor genetic variation relates to empathy and stress reactivity in humans. PNAS 106 50 21437 21441 19934046 PMC2795557
  40. [48]Gregory SG Connelly JJ Towers AJ Johnson J Biscocho D 2009 Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Medicine 7 62 19845972 PMC2774338
  41. [49]Zechner U Wilda M Kehrer-Sawatzki H Vogel W Fundele R 2001 A high density of X-linked genes for general cognitive ability: a run-away process shaping human evolution? Trends in Genetics 17 12 697 701 11718922
  42. [50]Lawrence K Campbell R Swettenham J Terstegge J Akers R 2003 Interpreting gaze in Turner syndrome: impaired sensitivity to intention and emotion, but preservation of social cueing. Neuropsychologia 41 8 894 905 12667526
  43. [52]Kesler SR Blasey CM Brown WE Yankowitz J Zeng SM 2003 Effects of X-monosomy and X-linked imprinting on superior temporal gyrus morphology in Turner syndrome. Biological Psychiatry 54 6 636 46 13129659 PMC3061621
  44. [53]Wicker B Keysers C Plailly J Royet JP Gallese V 2003 Both of us disgusted in My insula: the common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40 3 655 64 14642287
  45. [54]Weiss LA Purcell S Waggoner S Lawrence K Spektor D 2007 Identification of EFHC2 as a quantitative trait locus for fear recognition in Turner syndrome. Human Molecular Genetics 16 1 107 113 17164267
  46. [55]Skuse D 2006 Genetic influences on the neural basis of social cognition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361 1476 2129 2141 17118928 PMC1764846
  47. [56]Mazzola F Seigal A MacAskill A Corden B Lawrence K 2006 Eye tracking and fear recognition deficits in Turner syndrome. Social Neuroscience 1 3–4 259 269 18633792
  48. [57]Plagge A Isles AR Gordon E Humby T Dean W 2005 Imprinted Nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Molecular and Cellular Bioliology 25 8 3019 26 PMC1069615 15798190
  49. [58]Davies W Isles A Smith R Karunadasa D Burrmann D 2005 Xlr3b is a new imprinted candidate for X-linked parent-of-origin effects on cognitive function in mice. Nature Genetics 37 6 625 9 15908950
  50. [59]Goos L Silverman I 2006 The inheritance of cognitive skills: does genomic imprinting play a role? Journal of Neurogenetics 20 1 19 40 16807194
  51. [62]Ruffman T Perner J Natio M Parkin L Clement W 1998 Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology 34 161 174 9471013
  52. [63]Farhadian M Abdullah R Mansor M Redzuan M Kumar V 2010 Theory of Mind, Birth Order, and Siblings among Preschool Children American. Journal of Scientific Research 7 25 35
  53. [64]Cutting AL Dunn J 1999 Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: Individual differences and interrelation. Child Development 70 853 865 10446724
  54. [65]Cole K Mitchel P 2000 Siblings in development of executive control and a theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 18 279 295
  55. [66]Lewis C Freeman NH Kyriakidou C Maridaki-Kasotaki K Berridge DM 1996 Social influences on flase belief access: specific sibling influences or general apprenticeship? Child Development 67 2930 2947 9071766
  56. [67]Wright Cassidy K Shaw Fineberg D Brown K Perkin A 2005 Theory of Mind May Be Contagious, but You Don't Catch It From Your Twin. Child Development 76 1 97 106 15693760
  57. [68]Ruffman T Slade L Crowe E 2002 The relation between children's and mother's mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Development 73 3 734 751 12038548
  58. [72]Baron-Cohen S Wheelwright S 2004 The Empathizing Quotient (EQ): an investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome and high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34 2 163 175 15162935
  59. [73]Wheelwright S Baron-Cohen S Goldenfeld N Delaney J Fine D 2006 Predicting Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) from the Systemizing Quotient-Revised (SQ-R) and Empathy Quotient (EQ). Brain Research 1079 1 47 56 16473340
  60. [74]Carver C White T 1994 Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS?BAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology 67 2 319 333
  61. [77]Carroll JM Young CK 2006 Sex and discipline differences in empathizing, systemizing and autistic symptomatology: evidence from a student population. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 36 949 957 16897399
  62. [79]Hoekstra RA Bartels M Cath DC Boomsma DI 2008 Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): a study in Dutch population and patient groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38 8 1555 1566 18302013 PMC2516538
  63. [80]Wellman HM Liu D 2004 Scaling of theory of mind tasks. Child Development 75 655 684 15056204
  64. [81]Bloom P German TP 2000 Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 77 B25 B31 10980256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ragsdale, G., & Foley, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ragsdale, Gillian
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-08-05
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
e23236
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030042634
Cited by
29
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
theory of mind, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, parent-of-origin effects, maternal influence, paternal effects, sibling pairs, behavioral inhibition, attention, executive function, sex differences, social cognition, heritability
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Behavior, Siblings, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review