Cited by 42Museums and Cultural HeritageAnimal and Plant Science EducationDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research

An Investigation into the Determining Factors of Zoo Visitor Attendances in UK Zoos

Open access
Whitworth, Andrew William·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The debate as to which animals are most beneficial to keep in zoos in terms of financial and conservative value is readily disputed; however, demographic factors have also been shown to relate to visitor numbers on an international level. The main aims of this research were: (1) To observe the distribution and location of zoos across the UK, (2) to develop a way of calculating zoo popularity in terms of the species kept within a collection and (3) to investigate the factors related to visitor numbers regarding admission costs, popularity of the collection in terms of the species kept and local demographic factors. Zoo visitor numbers were positively correlated with generated popularity ratings for zoos based on the species kept within a collection and admission prices (Pearson correlation: n = 34, r = 0.268, P = 0.126 and n = 34, r = -0.430, P = 0.011). Animal collections are aggregated around large cities and tourist regions, particularly coastal areas. No relationship between demographic variables and visitor numbers was found (Pearson correlation: n = 34, r = 0.268, P = 0.126), which suggests that the popularity of a zoo's collection relative to the types and numbers of species kept is more indicative of a collection's visitor numbers than its surrounding demographic figures. Zoos should incorporate generating high popularity scores as part of their collection planning strategies, to ensure that they thrive in the future, not only as tourist attractions but also as major conservation organizations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0029839

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Charismatic colouration and novel appearance have proven to be powerful visitor draws and elicit increased dwell times.

    “Charismatic colouration and novel appearance have proven to be powerful visitor draws [21,27] and elicit increased dwell times [87].”

    From Tiger colour morphs in zoos raise conservation and welfare concerns (2026) · cites this paper as [27]

    In Results > Animal popularity (page unavailable), bright colours rank among the most-liked characteristics, and rare and exotic animals score more highly than common or local ones. Results > Factor comparisons with visitor numbers reports a correlation between overall animal-popularity scores and attendance, but does not establish that colouration or novel appearance themselves are powerful visitor draws; unusual-looking animals scored low. The dwell-time clause is attached to a different citation, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Hutchins M Smith B Allard R 2003 In defense of zoos and aquariums: the ethical basis for keeping wild animals in captivity. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 223 958 966 14552481
  2. [2]Turley SK 1999 Exploring the future of the traditional UK zoo. Journal of vacation marketing 5 340 355
  3. [4]Gusset M Dick G 2011 The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biology 30 5 566 569 21136509
  4. [5]Mason P 2000 Zoo tourism: the need for more research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8 333 339
  5. [13]Lorenz K 1971 Part and parcel in animal and human societies. Studies in animal and human behavior 2 Cambridge,, MA Harvard University Press 115 195

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitworth, A. W.
Affiliations
Institute for Biodiversity (DE)
Corresponding author
Whitworth, Andrew William
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-01-11
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e29839
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011506315
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
64.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Manchester Metropolitan University
  • University of Glasgow
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Animal and Plant Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Keywords
entrance fees, animal collections, species diversity, demographic factors, collection planning
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Zoo, Conservation of Natural Resources, Demography, Family Characteristics, United Kingdom, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review