The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coronavirus Papain-like Proteases Negatively Regulate Antiviral Innate Immune Response through Disruption of STING-Mediated Signaling
Open accessAbstract
Viruses have evolved elaborate mechanisms to evade or inactivate the complex system of sensors and signaling molecules that make up the host innate immune response. Here we show that human coronavirus (HCoV) NL63 and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV papain-like proteases (PLP) antagonize innate immune signaling mediated by STING (stimulator of interferon genes, also known as MITA/ERIS/MYPS). STING resides in the endoplasmic reticulum and upon activation, forms dimers which assemble with MAVS, TBK-1 and IKKε, leading to IRF-3 activation and subsequent induction of interferon (IFN). We found that expression of the membrane anchored PLP domain from human HCoV-NL63 (PLP2-TM) or SARS-CoV (PLpro-TM) inhibits STING-mediated activation of IRF-3 nuclear translocation and induction of IRF-3 dependent promoters. Both catalytically active and inactive forms of CoV PLPs co-immunoprecipitated with STING, and viral replicase proteins co-localize with STING in HCoV-NL63-infected cells. Ectopic expression of catalytically active PLP2-TM blocks STING dimer formation and negatively regulates assembly of STING-MAVS-TBK1/IKKε complexes required for activation of IRF-3. STING dimerization was also substantially reduced in cells infected with SARS-CoV. Furthermore, the level of ubiquitinated forms of STING, RIG-I, TBK1 and IRF-3 are reduced in cells expressing wild type or catalytic mutants of PLP2-TM, likely contributing to disruption of signaling required for IFN induction. These results describe a new mechanism used by CoVs in which CoV PLPs negatively regulate antiviral defenses by disrupting the STING-mediated IFN induction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling
Ishikawa, H., & Barber, G. N. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07317 · Cited by 3,576
STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity
Ishikawa, H., Ma, Z., & Barber, G. N. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08476 · Cited by 2,759 · cited 2×
“Recent studies revealed that STING associates with MAVS to recruit TBK-1/IKKe and IRF-3 to a complex [8], and that activation of STING is critical for activation of IRF-3 [11,12].”
Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus
Meylan, E., Curran, J., Hofmann, K., Moradpour, D., Binder, M., Bartenschlager, R., & Tschopp, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04193 · Cited by 2,401
RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5’-phosphates
Pichlmair, A., Schulz, O., Tan, C. P., Näslund, T. I., Liljeström, P., Weber, F., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132998 · Cited by 2,210
Devaraj, S. G., Wang, N., Chen, Z., Chen, Z., Tseng, M., Barretto, N., Lin, R., Peters, C. J., Tseng, C.-T. K., Baker, S. C., et al. (2007) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m704870200 · Cited by 411
Self-citationZhao, J., Zhao, J., & Perlman, S. (2010) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.01049-10 · Cited by 340
Cited by
The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention
Tay, M. Z., Poh, C. M., Rénia, L., MacAry, P. A., & Ng, L. F. P. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0311-8 · Cited by 4,360
Channappanavar, R., & Perlman, S. (2017) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-017-0629-x · Cited by 2,524
Immunology of COVID-19: Current State of the Science
Vabret, N., Britton, G. J., Gruber, C., Hegde, S., Kim, J., Kuksin, M., Levantovsky, R., Malle, L., Moreira, A., Park, M. D., et al. (2020) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2020.05.002 · Cited by 1,623
Deubiquitylating enzymes and drug discovery: emerging opportunities
Harrigan, J. A., Jacq, X., Martin, N. M., & Jackson, S. P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.152 · Cited by 940
Báez-Santos, Y. M., St. John, S. E., & Mesecar, A. D. (2015) · Antiviral Research · doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.12.015 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, L., Xing, Y., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Yang, Y., Nichols, D. B., Clementz, M. A., Banach, B. S., Li, K., Baker, S. C., & Chen, Z.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-02-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e30802
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972126235
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coronavirus Papain-like Proteases Negatively Regulate Antiviral Innate Immune Response through Disruption of STING-Mediated Signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0030802
- The paper
- Sun, L., Xing, Y., Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Yang, Y., Nichols, D. B., Clementz, M. A., Banach, B. S., Li, K., Baker, S. C., & Chen, Z. (2012). Coronavirus Papain-like Proteases Negatively Regulate Antiviral Innate Immune Response through Disruption of STING-Mediated Signaling. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030802
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.