The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Battle Lost? Report on Two Centuries of Invasion and Management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa
Open accessAbstract
Recent discussion on invasive species has invigorated the debate on strategies to manage these species. Lantana camara L., a shrub native to the American tropics, has become one of the worst weeds in recorded history. In Australia, India and South Africa, Lantana has become very widespread occupying millions of hectares of land. Here, we examine historical records to reconstruct invasion and management of Lantana over two centuries and ask: Can we fight the spread of invasive species or do we need to develop strategies for their adaptive management? We carried out extensive research of historical records constituting over 75% of records on invasion and management of this species in the three countries. The records indicate that governments in Australia, India and South Africa have taken aggressive measures to eradicate Lantana over the last two centuries, but these efforts have been largely unsuccessful. We found that despite control measures, the invasion trajectory of Lantana has continued upwards and that post-war land-use change might have been a possible trigger for this spread. A large majority of studies on invasive species address timescales of less than one year; and even fewer address timescales of >10 years. An understanding of species invasions over long time-scales is of paramount importance. While archival records may give only a partial picture of the spread and management of invasive species, in the absence of any other long-term dataset on the ecology of Lantana, our study provides an important insight into its invasion, spread and management over two centuries and across three continents. While the established paradigm is to expend available resources on attempting to eradicate invasive species, our findings suggest that in the future, conservationists will need to develop strategies for their adaptive management rather than fighting a losing battle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 · Cited by 1,406
Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., & Pace, M. L. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.07.007 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Shackleton, R. T., Biggs, R., Richardson, D. M., & Larson, B. M. H. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.005 · Cited by 91
Ameliorative effect of Lantana camara biochar on coal mine spoil and growth of maize ( Zea mays )
Ghosh, D., Masto, R. E., & Maiti, S. K. (2020) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12626 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhagwat, S. A., Breman, E., Thekaekara, T., Thornton, T. F., & Willis, K. J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-03-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e32407
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971793787
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Battle Lost? Report on Two Centuries of Invasion and Management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0032407
- The paper
- Bhagwat, S. A., Breman, E., Thekaekara, T., Thornton, T. F., & Willis, K. J. (2012). A Battle Lost? Report on Two Centuries of Invasion and Management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.