Cited by 71Amphibian and Reptile BiologyAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Demographic and Phenotypic Effects of Human Mediated Trophic Subsidy on a Large Australian Lizard (Varanus varius): Meal Ticket or Last Supper?

Open access
Jessop, Tim S., Smissen, Peter, Scheelings, Franciscus, Dempster, Tim·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Humans are increasingly subsidizing and altering natural food webs via changes to nutrient cycling and productivity. Where human trophic subsidies are concentrated and persistent within natural environments, their consumption could have complex consequences for wild animals through altering habitat preferences, phenotypes and fitness attributes that influence population dynamics. Human trophic subsidies conceptually create both costs and benefits for animals that receive increased calorific and altered nutritional inputs. Here, we evaluated the effects of a common terrestrial human trophic subsidies, human food refuse, on population and phenotypic (comprising morphological and physiological health indices) parameters of a large predatory lizard (∼2 m length), the lace monitor (Varanus varius), in southern Australia by comparison with individuals not receiving human trophic subsidies. At human trophic subsidies sites, lizards were significantly more abundant and their sex ratio highly male biased compared to control sites in natural forest. Human trophic subsidies recipient lizards were significantly longer, heavier and in much greater body condition. Blood parasites were significantly lower in human trophic subsidies lizards. Collectively, our results imply that human trophic subsidized sites were especially attractive to adult male lace monitors and had large phenotypic effects. However, we cannot rule out that the male-biased aggregations of large monitors at human trophic subsidized sites could lead to reductions in reproductive fitness, through mate competition and offspring survival, and through greater exposure of eggs and juveniles to predation. These possibilities could have negative population consequences. Aggregations of these large predators may also have flow on effects to surrounding food web dynamics through elevated predation levels. Given that flux of energy and nutrients into food webs is central to the regulation of populations and their communities, we advocate further studies of human trophic subsidies be undertaken to evaluate the potentially large ecological implications of this significant human environmental alteration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0034069

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Australian lace monitors consuming human refuse experience improved body condition and reduced blood parasite infection compared to those that do not subsist on anthropogenic food waste.

    “Australian lace monitors (Varanus varius) consuming human refuse experience improved body condition and reduced blood parasite infection compared to those that do not subsist on anthropogenic food waste (Jessop et al. 2012).”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Jessop et al. 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 44 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]Shochat E Warren PS Faeth SH McIntyre NE Hope D 2006 From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21 186 191 16701084
  2. [4]Martinson TJ Flaspohler DJ 2003 Winter bird feeding and localized predation on simulated bark-dwelling arthropods. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31 510 16
  3. [13]Oro D Cam E Pradel R Martínez-Abraín A 2004 Influence of food availability on demography and local population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271 387 396 PMC1691609 15101698
  4. [14]Simpson SJ Raubenheimer D 2009 Macronutrient balance and lifespan. Aging 1 875 880 20157561 PMC2815731
  5. [15]Sapkota AR Lefferts LY McKenzie S Walker P 2007 What do we feed to food-production animals? A Review of animal feed Ingredients and their potential impacts on Human Health. Environmental Health Perspectives 115 663 670 17520050 PMC1867957
  6. [16]Dempster T Sanchez-Jerez P Fernandez-Jover D Bayle-Sempere J Nilsen R 2011 Proxy measures of fitness suggest coastal fish farms can act as population sources and not ecological traps for wild gadoid fish. PLoS ONE 6 e15646 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.001564 21264217 PMC3022022 · DOI
  7. [17]Meretsky VJ Mannan RW 1999 Supplemental feeding regimes for Egyptian vultures in the Negev Desert, Israel. Journal of Wildlife Management 63 107 15
  8. [18]Robertson BC Elliott GP Eason DK Clout MN Gemmell NJ 2006 Sex allocation theory aids species conservation. Biology Letters 2 229 31 17148369 PMC1618899
  9. [20]Robertson BA Hutto RL 2006 A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87 1075 1085 16761584
  10. [21]KloskowskiFish J stocking creates an ecological trap for an avian predator via effects on prey availability. Oikos. In press doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19942 · DOI
  11. [24]Sheldon BC Verhulst S 1996 Ecological immunology: costly parasite defences and trade-offs in evolutionary ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 317 321 21237861
  12. [25]Moore IT Jessop TS 2003 Stress, reproduction, and adrenocortical modulation in amphibians and reptiles. Hormones & Behaviour 43 39 47 12614633
  13. [26]Bonier F Martin PR Moore IT Wingfield JC 2009 Do baseline glucocorticoids predict fitness? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 24 634 642 19679371
  14. [28]Clarke AB 1978 Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science 201 163 165 17801832
  15. [29]Werren JH 1980 Sex ratio adaptations to local mate competition in a parasitic wasp. Science 208 1157 1159 17783073
  16. [30]Kavernemo C Ahnesjö I 1996 The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11 404 408 21237898
  17. [32]Guarino F 2002 Spatial ecology of a large carnivorous lizard, Varanus varius (Squamata: Varanidae). Journal of Zoology 258 449 457
  18. [34]Halverson J Spelman L 2002 Sex determination and its role in management. Murphy JB Ciofi C de La Panouse C Walsh T Komodo Dragons: Biology and Conservation Washington Smithsonian Institution Press 165 177
  19. [35]Campbell TW 2006 Clinical pathology of reptiles. Mader D Reptile Medicine and Surgery, 2nd ed St. Louis, Missouri Saunders Elsevier 453 470
  20. [36]Campbell TW Ellis CK 2007 Avian and exotic animal hematology and cytology, 3rd edition. Iowa Blackwell Publishing 286
  21. [37]Sykes JM Klaphake E 2008 Reptile Hematology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice 11 481 500 18675730
  22. [38]Jessop T Sumner J Lance V Limpus C 2004 Reproduction in shark attacked sea turtles is supported by stress reduction mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271 S91 S94 PMC1809973 15101429
  23. [39]Madsen T Ujvari B Olsson M 2005 Old pythons stay fit; effect of hematozoan infections on life-history traits of a large tropical predator. Oecologia 142 407 412 15517406
  24. [41]Oro D Genovart X Ruiz X Jiménez J Garcia-Gaus J 1996 Differences in diet, population size and reproductive performance between two colonies of Audouin’s gull Larus audouinii affected by a trawling moratorium. Journal of Avian Biology 27 245 251

Authors
Jessop, T. S., Smissen, P., Scheelings, F., & Dempster, T.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Jessop, Tim S.
  • Smissen, Peter
  • Dempster, Tim
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-04-03
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e34069
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171171119
Cited by
71
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Varanus varius, sex ratio, body condition, blood parasites, phenotypic effects, population dynamics, southern Australia
MeSH terms
Animals, Corticosterone, Endocrine System, Female, Humans, Human Activities, Lizards, Male, Phenotype, Population Density, Sex Ratio, Stress, Physiological, Food Chain, Parasite Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review