Cited by 109Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Importance of Intracellular pH in Determining the Uptake and Efficacy of the Weakly Basic Chemotherapeutic Drug, Doxorubicin

Open access
Swietach, Pawel, Hulikova, Alzbeta, Patiar, Shalini, Vaughan-Jones, Richard D., Harris, Adrian L.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Low extracellular pH (pH(e)), that is characteristic of many tumours, tends to reduce the uptake of weakly basic drugs, such as doxorubicin, thereby conferring a degree of physiological resistance to chemotherapy. It has been assumed, from pH-partition theory, that the effect of intracellular pH (pH(i)) is symmetrically opposite, although this has not been tested experimentally. Doxorubicin uptake into colon HCT116 cells was measured using the drug's intrinsic fluorescence under conditions that alter pH(i) and pH(e) or pH(i) alone. Acutely, doxorubicin influx across the cell-membrane correlates with the trans-membrane pH-gradient (facilitated at alkaline pH(e) and acidic pH(i)). However, the protonated molecule is not completely membrane-impermeant and, therefore, overall drug uptake is less pH(e)-sensitive than expected from pH-partitioning. Once inside cells, doxorubicin associates with slowly-releasing nuclear binding sites. The occupancy of these sites increases with pH(i), such that steady-state drug uptake can be greater with alkaline cytoplasm, in contradiction to pH-partition theory. Measurements of cell proliferation demonstrate that doxorubicin efficacy is enhanced at alkaline pH(i) and that pH-partition theory is inadequate to account for this. The limitations in the predictive power of pH-partition theory arise because it only accounts for the pH(i)/pH(e)-sensitivity of drug entry into cells but not the drug's subsequent interactions that, independently, show pH(i)-dependence. In summary, doxorubicin uptake into cells is favoured by high pH(e) and high pH(i). This modified formalism should be taken into account when designing manoeuvres aimed at increasing doxorubicin efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0035949

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intracellular pH is important in determining the efficacy of weakly basic chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin; a lower pH reduces drug uptake, contributing to drug resistance.

    “Swietach et al . highlighted the importance of intracellular pH on determining the efficacy of weakly basic chemotherapeutic drugs such as doxorubicin, by showing that a lower pH reduces drug uptake, contributing to drug resistance. 65”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Swietach, P., Hulikova, A., Patiar, S., Vaughan-Jones, R. D., & Harris, A. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Swietach, Pawel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-04-26
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
e35949
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968971179
Cited by
109
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (11359)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10163)
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/016/26423)
  • Royal Society
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
doxorubicin, intracellular pH, extracellular pH, drug uptake, weakly basic drugs, chemoresistance, HCT116 cells, nuclear binding sites, cell proliferation
MeSH terms
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic, Binding Sites, Cell Nucleus, Doxorubicin, Humans, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Models, Chemical, HCT116 Cells, Cell Proliferation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review