The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of the Resident Microbiota on the Nutritional Phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Animals are chronically infected by benign and beneficial microorganisms that generally promote animal health through their effects on the nutrition, immune function and other physiological systems of the host. Insight into the host-microbial interactions can be obtained by comparing the traits of animals experimentally deprived of their microbiota and untreated animals. Drosophila melanogaster is an experimentally tractable system to study host-microbial interactions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The nutritional significance of the microbiota was investigated in D. melanogaster bearing unmanipulated microbiota, demonstrated by 454 sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons to be dominated by the α-proteobacterium Acetobacter, and experimentally deprived of the microbiota by egg dechorionation (conventional and axenic flies, respectively). In axenic flies, larval development rate was depressed with no effect on adult size relative to conventional flies, indicating that the microbiota promotes larval growth rates. Female fecundity did not differ significantly between conventional and axenic flies, but axenic flies had significantly reduced metabolic rate and altered carbohydrate allocation, including elevated glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We have shown that elimination of the resident microbiota extends larval development and perturbs energy homeostasis and carbohydrate allocation patterns of of D. melanogaster. Our results indicate that the resident microbiota promotes host nutrition and interacts with the regulation of host metabolism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine
Ley, R. E., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017 · Cited by 3,358
Bacterial Community Variation in Human Body Habitats Across Space and Time
Costello, E. K., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Fierer, N., Gordon, J. I., & Knight, R. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1177486 · Cited by 3,231
Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system
Kau, A. L., Ahern, P. P., Griffin, N. W., Goodman, A. L., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10213 · Cited by 2,588
Metabolic Syndrome and Altered Gut Microbiota in Mice Lacking Toll-Like Receptor 5
Vijay-Kumar, M., Aitken, J. D., Carvalho, F. A., Cullender, T. C., Mwangi, S., Srinivasan, S., Sitaraman, S. V., Knight, R., Ley, R. E., & Gewirtz, A. T. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179721 · Cited by 2,068
An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease
Dethlefsen, L., McFall-Ngai, M., & Relman, D. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06245 · Cited by 1,660
Diamant, M., Blaak, E. E., & de Vos, W. M. (2011) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2010.00797.x · Cited by 308 · cited 1×
“It is increasingly recognized that all animals are chronically infected by microorganisms, and that the resident microbiota, especially the substantial microbial community in the alimentary tract, has major effects on nutrient processing, metabolic signaling and, ultimately, the health and well-being of the animal hos…”
Background
Cited by
The gut microbiota of insects – diversity in structure and function
Engel, P., & Moran, N. A. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12025 · Cited by 2,595
Immunity in Drosophila melanogaster — from microbial recognition to whole-organism physiology
Buchon, N., Silverman, N., & Cherry, S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3763 · Cited by 866
Microbial endocrinology: the interplay between the microbiota and the endocrine system
Neuman, H., Debelius, J. W., Knight, R., & Koren, O. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuu010 · Cited by 613
Exploring host–microbiota interactions in animal models and humans
Kostic, A. D., Howitt, M. R., & Garrett, W. S. (2013) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.212522.112 · Cited by 494
Anatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract of Drosophila melanogaster
Miguel-Aliaga, I., Jasper, H., & Lemaitre, B. (2018) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.118.300224 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Ridley, E. V., Wong, A. C.-N., Westmiller, S., & Douglas, A. E.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-05-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e36765
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975431864
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 16.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of the Resident Microbiota on the Nutritional Phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0036765
- The paper
- Ridley, E. V., Wong, A. C.-N., Westmiller, S., & Douglas, A. E. (2012). Impact of the Resident Microbiota on the Nutritional Phenotype of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036765
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.