Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gut Pathology and Responses to the Microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera

Open access
Dussaubat, Claudia, Brunet, Jean-Luc, Higes, Mariano, Colbourne, John K., Lopez, Jacqueline, Choi, Jeong-Hyeon, Martín-Hernández, Raquel, Botías, Cristina, Cousin, Marianne, McDonnell, Cynthia, Bonnet, Marc, Belzunces, Luc P., Moritz, Robin F. A., Le Conte, Yves, Alaux, Cédric·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

The microsporidium Nosema ceranae is a newly prevalent parasite of the European honey bee (Apis mellifera). Although this parasite is presently spreading across the world into its novel host, the mechanisms by it which affects the bees and how bees respond are not well understood. We therefore performed an extensive characterization of the parasite effects at the molecular level by using genetic and biochemical tools. The transcriptome modifications at the midgut level were characterized seven days post-infection with tiling microarrays. Then we tested the bee midgut response to infection by measuring activity of antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (superoxide dismutases, glutathione peroxidases, glutathione reductase, and glutathione-S-transferase). At the gene-expression level, the bee midgut responded to N. ceranae infection by an increase in oxidative stress concurrent with the generation of antioxidant enzymes, defense and protective response specifically observed in the gut of mammals and insects. However, at the enzymatic level, the protective response was not confirmed, with only glutathione-S-transferase exhibiting a higher activity in infected bees. The oxidative stress was associated with a higher transcription of sugar transporter in the gut. Finally, a dramatic effect of the microsporidia infection was the inhibition of genes involved in the homeostasis and renewal of intestinal tissues (Wnt signaling pathway), a phenomenon that was confirmed at the histological level. This tissue degeneration and prevention of gut epithelium renewal may explain early bee death. In conclusion, our integrated approach not only gives new insights into the pathological effects of N. ceranae and the bee gut response, but also demonstrate that the honey bee gut is an interesting model system for studying host defense responses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0037017

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Dussaubat, C., Brunet, J.-L., Higes, M., Colbourne, J. K., Lopez, J., Choi, J.-H., Martín-Hernández, R., Botías, C., Cousin, M., McDonnell, C., Bonnet, M., Belzunces, L. P., Moritz, R. F. A., Le Conte, Y., & Alaux, C.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-05-18
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
e37017
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027518719
Cited by
268
References
65
FWCI
17.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gut Pathology and Responses to the Microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0037017
The paper
Dussaubat, C., Brunet, J.-L., Higes, M., Colbourne, J. K., Lopez, J., Choi, J.-H., Martín-Hernández, R., Botías, C., Cousin, M., McDonnell, C., Bonnet, M., Belzunces, L. P., Moritz, R. F. A., Le Conte, Y., & Alaux, C. (2012). Gut Pathology and Responses to the Microsporidium Nosema ceranae in the Honey Bee Apis mellifera. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.