The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Two-Staged Model of Na+ Exclusion in Rice Explained by 3D Modeling of HKT Transporters and Alternative Splicing
Open accessAbstract
The HKT family of Na(+) and Na(+)/K(+) transporters is implicated in plant salinity tolerance. Amongst these transporters, the cereal HKT1;4 and HKT1;5 are responsible for Na(+) exclusion from photosynthetic tissues, a key mechanism for plant salinity tolerance. It has been suggested that Na(+) is retrieved from the xylem transpiration stream either in the root or the leaf sheath, protecting the leaf blades from excessive Na(+) accumulation. However, direct evidence for this scenario is scarce. Comparative modeling and evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa) HKT-transporters based on the recent crystal structure of the bacterial TrkH K(+) transporter allowed to reconcile transcriptomic and physiological data. For OsHKT1;5, both transcript abundance and protein structural features within the selectivity filter could control shoot Na(+) accumulation in a range of rice varieties. For OsHKT1;4, alternative splicing of transcript and the anatomical complexity of the sheath needed to be taken into account. Thus, Na(+) accumulation in a specific leaf blade seems to be regulated by abundance of a correctly spliced OsHKT1;4 transcript in a corresponding sheath. Overall, allelic variation of leaf blade Na(+) accumulation can be explained by a complex interplay of gene transcription, alternative splicing and protein structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Self-citation
Cited by
The Role of Na+ and K+ Transporters in Salt Stress Adaptation in Glycophytes
Assaha, D. V. M., Ueda, A., Saneoka, H., Al-Yahyai, R., & Yaish, M. W. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00509 · Cited by 914
Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance
Zhang, J.-L., & Shi, H. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9813-6 · Cited by 342
The twins K+ and Na+ in plants
Benito, B., Haro, R., Amtmann, A., Cuin, T. A., & Dreyer, I. (2014) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2013.10.014 · Cited by 274
Engineering salinity tolerance in plants: progress and prospects
Wani, S. H., Kumar, V., Khare, T., Guddimalli, R., Parveda, M., Solymosi, K., Suprasanna, P., & Kavi Kishor, P. B. (2020) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-020-03366-6 · Cited by 233
Mapping of HKT1;5 Gene in Barley Using GWAS Approach and Its Implication in Salt Tolerance Mechanism
Hazzouri, K. M., Khraiwesh, B., Amiri, K. M. A., Pauli, D., Blake, T., Shahid, M., Mullath, S. K., Nelson, D., Mansour, A. L., Salehi-Ashtiani, K., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00156 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Cotsaftis, O., Plett, D., Shirley, N., Tester, M., & Hrmova, M.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-07-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e39865
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077329481
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Two-Staged Model of Na+ Exclusion in Rice Explained by 3D Modeling of HKT Transporters and Alternative Splicing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0039865
- The paper
- Cotsaftis, O., Plett, D., Shirley, N., Tester, M., & Hrmova, M. (2012). A Two-Staged Model of Na+ Exclusion in Rice Explained by 3D Modeling of HKT Transporters and Alternative Splicing. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.