The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels
Open accessAbstract
Ligating adapters with unique synthetic oligonucleotide sequences (sequence tags) onto individual DNA samples before massively parallel sequencing is a popular and efficient way to obtain sequence data from many individual samples. Tag sequences should be numerous and sufficiently different to ensure sequencing, replication, and oligonucleotide synthesis errors do not cause tags to be unrecoverable or confused. However, many design approaches only protect against substitution errors during sequencing and extant tag sets contain too few tag sequences. We developed an open-source software package to validate sequence tags for conformance to two distance metrics and design sequence tags robust to indel and substitution errors. We use this software package to evaluate several commercial and non-commercial sequence tag sets, design several large sets (max(count) = 7,198) of edit metric sequence tags having different lengths and degrees of error correction, and integrate a subset of these edit metric tags to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and sequencing adapters. We validate a subset of these edit metric tagged PCR primers and sequencing adapters by sequencing on several platforms and subsequent comparison to commercially available alternatives. We find that several commonly used sets of sequence tags or design methodologies used to produce sequence tags do not meet the minimum expectations of their underlying distance metric, and we find that PCR primers and sequencing adapters incorporating edit metric sequence tags designed by our software package perform as well as their commercial counterparts. We suggest that researchers evaluate sequence tags prior to use or evaluate tags that they have been using. The sequence tag sets we design improve on extant sets because they are large, valid across the set, and robust to the suite of substitution, insertion, and deletion errors affecting massively parallel sequencing workflows on all currently used platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pahlich, E., & Gerlitz, C. (1980) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(80)85004-7 · Cited by 10,599
Binary Codes capable of currecting deletions, insertions, and reversals
Levenshtein, V. I. (1965) · Soviet physics. Doklady · Cited by 10,358
Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces
Untergasser, A., Cutcutache, I., Koressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B. C., Remm, M., & Rozen, S. G. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks596 · Cited by 9,461
Self-citationGenome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors
Margulies, M., Egholm, M., Altman, W. E., Attiya, S., Bader, J. S., Bemben, L. A., Berka, J., Braverman, M. S., Chen, Y.-J., Chen, Z., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03959 · Cited by 7,693
Next-generation DNA sequencing
Shendure, J., & Ji, H. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1486 · Cited by 4,509
Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry
Bentley, D. R., Balasubramanian, S., Swerdlow, H. P., Smith, G. P., Milton, J., Brown, C. G., Hall, K. P., Evers, D. J., Barnes, C. L., Bignell, H. R., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07517 · Cited by 3,684
ERROR DETECTING AND ERROR CORRECTING CODES
Chauhan, N., Yadav, P., & Kumari, P. (2014) · Cited by 3,270
Illumina Sequencing Library Preparation for Highly Multiplexed Target Capture and Sequencing
Meyer, M., & Kircher, M. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Protocols · doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · Cited by 2,231
Kress, W. J., & Erickson, D. L. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000508 · Cited by 1,527
Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex
Hamady, M., Walker, J. J., Harris, J. K., Gold, N. J., & Knight, R. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1184 · Cited by 1,310
Cited by
Single-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment
Azizi, E., Carr, A. J., Plitas, G., Cornish, A. E., Konopacki, C., Prabhakaran, S., Nainys, J., Wu, K., Kiseliovas, V., Setty, M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · Cited by 1,976
DNA Fountain enables a robust and efficient storage architecture
Erlich, Y., & Zielinski, D. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj2038 · Cited by 898
Fungal community analysis by high‐throughput sequencing of amplified markers – a user's guide
Lindahl, B. D., Nilsson, R. H., Tedersoo, L., Abarenkov, K., Carlsen, T., Kjøller, R., Kõljalg, U., Pennanen, T., Rosendahl, S., Stenlid, J., et al. (2013) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.12243 · Cited by 892
Coon, K. L., Brown, M. R., & Strand, M. R. (2016) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13877 · Cited by 346
Faircloth, B. C., Branstetter, M. G., White, N. D., & Brady, S. G. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12328 · Cited by 334
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Faircloth, B. C., & Glenn, T. C.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-08-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e42543
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009039142
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0042543
- The paper
- Faircloth, B. C., & Glenn, T. C. (2012). Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.