The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GlycReSoft: A Software Package for Automated Recognition of Glycans from LC/MS Data
Open accessAbstract
Glycosylation modifies the physicochemical properties and protein binding functions of glycoconjugates. These modifications are biosynthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus by a series of enzymatic transformations that are under complex control. As a result, mature glycans on a given site are heterogeneous mixtures of glycoforms. This gives rise to a spectrum of adhesive properties that strongly influences interactions with binding partners and resultant biological effects. In order to understand the roles glycosylation plays in normal and disease processes, efficient structural analysis tools are necessary. In the field of glycomics, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) is used to profile the glycans present in a given sample. This technology enables comparison of glycan compositions and abundances among different biological samples, i.e. normal versus disease, normal versus mutant, etc. Manual analysis of the glycan profiling LC/MS data is extremely time-consuming and efficient software tools are needed to eliminate this bottleneck. In this work, we have developed a tool to computationally model LC/MS data to enable efficient profiling of glycans. Using LC/MS data deconvoluted by Decon2LS/DeconTools, we built a list of unique neutral masses corresponding to candidate glycan compositions summarized over their various charge states, adducts and range of elution times. Our work aims to provide confident identification of true compounds in complex data sets that are not amenable to manual interpretation. This capability is an essential part of glycomics work flows. We demonstrate this tool, GlycReSoft, using an LC/MS dataset on tissue derived heparan sulfate oligosaccharides. The software, code and a test data set are publically archived under an open source license.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Assigning Significance to Peptides Identified by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Decoy Databases
Käll, L., Storey, J. D., MacCoss, M. J., & Noble, W. S. (2008) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr700600n · Cited by 607
Jaitly, N., Mayampurath, A., Littlefield, K., Adkins, J. N., Anderson, G. A., & Smith, R. D. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-87 · Cited by 217
Self-citation
Cited by
Oligosaccharide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry: A Review of Recent Developments
Kailemia, M. J., Ruhaak, L. R., Lebrilla, C. B., & Amster, I. J. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403969n · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxwell, E., Tan, Y., Tan, Y., Hu, H., Benson, G., Aizikov, K., Conley, S., Staples, G. O., Slysz, G. W., Smith, R. D., & Zaia, J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-09-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e45474
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075500174
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GlycReSoft: A Software Package for Automated Recognition of Glycans from LC/MS Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0045474
- The paper
- Maxwell, E., Tan, Y., Tan, Y., Hu, H., Benson, G., Aizikov, K., Conley, S., Staples, G. O., Slysz, G. W., Smith, R. D., & Zaia, J. (2012). GlycReSoft: A Software Package for Automated Recognition of Glycans from LC/MS Data. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045474
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.