The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framing the Salmonidae Family Phylogenetic Portrait: A More Complete Picture from Increased Taxon Sampling
Open accessAbstract
Considerable research efforts have focused on elucidating the systematic relationships among salmonid fishes; an understanding of these patterns of relatedness will inform conservation- and fisheries-related issues, as well as provide a framework for investigating evolutionary mechanisms in the group. However, uncertainties persist in current Salmonidae phylogenies due to biological and methodological factors, and a comprehensive phylogeny including most representatives of the family could provide insight into the causes of these difficulties. Here we increase taxon sampling by including nearly all described salmonid species (n = 63) to present a time-calibrated and more complete portrait of Salmonidae using a combination of molecular markers and analytical techniques. This strategy improved resolution by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and helped discriminate methodological and systematic errors from sources of difficulty associated with biological processes. Our results highlight novel aspects of salmonid evolution. First, we call into question the widely-accepted evolutionary relationships among sub-families and suggest that Thymallinae, rather than Coregoninae, is the sister group to the remainder of Salmonidae. Second, we find that some groups in Salmonidae are older than previously thought and that the mitochondrial rate of molecular divergence varies markedly among genes and clades. We estimate the age of the family to be 59.1 MY (CI: 63.2-58.1 MY) old, which likely corresponds to the timing of whole genome duplication in salmonids. The average, albeit highly variable, mitochondrial rate of molecular divergence was estimated as ~0.31%/MY (CI: 0.27-0.36%/MY). Finally, we suggest that some species require taxonomic revision, including two monotypic genera, Stenodus and Salvethymus. In addition, we resolve some relationships that have been notoriously difficult to discern and present a clearer picture of the evolution of the group. Our findings represent an important contribution to the systematics of Salmonidae, and provide a useful tool for addressing questions related to fundamental and applied evolutionary issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201 · Cited by 4,237
Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading.
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412923 · Cited by 2,230
Sanderson, M. J. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003974 · Cited by 1,977
Sanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
Modeling compositional heterogeneity
Foster, P. G. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490445779 · Cited by 474
Resolution of Phylogenetic Conflict in Large Data Sets by Increased Taxon Sampling
Hedtke, S. M., Townsend, T. M., & Hillis, D. M. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600697358 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Berthelot, C., Brunet, F., Chalopin, D., Juanchich, A., Bernard, M., Noël, B., Bento, P., Da Silva, C., Labadie, K., Alberti, A., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4657 · Cited by 959
Macqueen, D. J., & Johnston, I. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2881 · Cited by 465
Yano, A., Nicol, B., Jouanno, E., Quillet, E., Fostier, A., Guyomard, R., & Guiguen, Y. (2013) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12032 · Cited by 360
Greer, J. B., Dalsky, E. M., Lane, R. F., & Hansen, J. D. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00196 · Cited by 85
Davesne, D., Meunier, F. J., Schmitt, A. D., Friedman, M., Otero, O., & Benson, R. B. J. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12505 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Crête-Lafrenière, A., Weir, L. K., & Bernatchez, L.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-10-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e46662
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017920360
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing the Salmonidae Family Phylogenetic Portrait: A More Complete Picture from Increased Taxon Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0046662
- The paper
- Crête-Lafrenière, A., Weir, L. K., & Bernatchez, L. (2012). Framing the Salmonidae Family Phylogenetic Portrait: A More Complete Picture from Increased Taxon Sampling. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046662
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.