CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 409Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesEmployment and Welfare StudiesWorkplace Health and Well-being

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-Term Unemployment and Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Milner, Allison, Page, Andrew, LaMontagne, Anthony D.·2013·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051333PMC PMC3547020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: There have been a number of reviews on the association+ between unemployment and suicide, but none have investigated how this relationship is influenced by duration of unemployment. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of those studies that assessed duration of unemployment as a risk factor for suicide. Studies considered as eligible for inclusion were population-based cohort or case-control designs; population-based ecological designs, or hospital based clinical cohort or case-control designs published in the year 1980 or later. RESULTS: The review identified 16 eligible studies, out of a possible 10,358 articles resulting from a search of four databases: PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Proquest. While all 16 studies measured unemployment duration in different ways, a common finding was that longer duration of unemployment was related to greater risk of suicide and suicide attempt. A random effects meta-analysis on a subsample of six cohort studies indicated that the pooled relative risk of suicide in relation to average follow-up time after unemployment was 1.70 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.18). However, results also suggested a possible habituation effect to unemployment over time, with the greatest risk of suicide occurring within five years of unemployment compared to the employed population (RR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.83 to 3.17). Relative risk appeared to decline in studies of those unemployed between 12 and 16 years compared to those currently employed (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.33). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that long-term unemployment is associated with greater incidence of suicide. Results of the meta-analysis suggest that risk is greatest in the first five years, and persists at a lower but elevated level up to 16 years after unemployment. These findings are limited by the paucity of data on this topic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0051333

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2012, Stata Release 12.1, College Station, Texas StataCorp LP
  2. Greenland S (1998) Meta-analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, editors. Modern epidemiology. 2nd ed. ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven. pp. 643–673

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 409

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Milner, A., Page, A., & LaMontagne, A. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Milner, Allison
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2013-01-16
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e51333
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0051333
PMC
PMC3547020
OpenAlex
W2085632436
Cited by
407
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (546248)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
long-term unemployment, suicide, suicide attempts, unemployment duration, suicide risk factors, habituation effect
MeSH terms
Humans, Risk Factors, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, Time Factors, Unemployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review