Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EMG-Driven Forward-Dynamic Estimation of Muscle Force and Joint Moment about Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Human Lower Extremity

Open access
Sartori, Massimo, Reggiani, Monica, Farina, Dario, Lloyd, David G.·2012·PLoS ONE

Abstract

This work examined if currently available electromyography (EMG) driven models, that are calibrated to satisfy joint moments about one single degree of freedom (DOF), could provide the same musculotendon unit (MTU) force solution, when driven by the same input data, but calibrated about a different DOF. We then developed a novel and comprehensive EMG-driven model of the human lower extremity that used EMG signals from 16 muscle groups to drive 34 MTUs and satisfy the resulting joint moments simultaneously produced about four DOFs during different motor tasks. This also led to the development of a calibration procedure that allowed identifying a set of subject-specific parameters that ensured physiological behavior for the 34 MTUs. Results showed that currently available single-DOF models did not provide the same unique MTU force solution for the same input data. On the other hand, the MTU force solution predicted by our proposed multi-DOF model satisfied joint moments about multiple DOFs without loss of accuracy compared to single-DOF models corresponding to each of the four DOFs. The predicted MTU force solution was (1) a function of experimentally measured EMGs, (2) the result of physiological MTU excitation, (3) reflected different MTU contraction strategies associated to different motor tasks, (4) coordinated a greater number of MTUs with respect to currently available single-DOF models, and (5) was not specific to an individual DOF dynamics. Therefore, our proposed methodology has the potential of producing a more dynamically consistent and generalizable MTU force solution than was possible using single-DOF EMG-driven models. This will help better address the important scientific questions previously approached using single-DOF EMG-driven modeling. Furthermore, it might have applications in the development of human-machine interfaces for assistive devices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0052618

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. TS Buchanan, 1995, Muscle activity is different for humans performing static tasks which require force control and position control, Neurosci Lett, 194, 61, 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11727-E · doi:10.1016/0304-3940(95)11727-e
  2. TS Buchanan, 1997, Muscle activation at the human knee during isometric flexion-extension and varus-valgus loads, J Orthop Res, 15, 11, 10.1002/jor.1100150103 · doi:10.1002/jor.1100150103
  3. Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Winby CR, Buchanan TS (2008) Neuromusculoskeletal modelling and simulation of tissue load in the lower extremities. In: Hong Y, Bartlett R, editors. Handbook of Biomechanics and Human Movement Science. New York: Routledge. pp. 3–17.
  4. CR Winby, 2008, Evaluation of different analytical methods for subject-specific scaling of musculotendon parameters, Journal of Biomechanics, 41, 1682, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.008 · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.008
  5. Kahle W, Frotscher M (2002) Color Atlas and Textbook of Human Anatomy, Vol 3: Nervous system and sensory organs. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag. 420 p. · doi:10.1055/b-005-148873
  6. J Bobet, 1990, Least-squares identification of the dynamic relation between the electromyogram and joint moment, Journal of Biomechanics, 23, 1275, 10.1016/0021-9290(90)90386-H · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(90)90386-h
  7. Sartori M, Farina D, Lloyd DG (2012) Hybrid Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling. In: Pons JL, Torricelli D, Pajaro M, editors. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation, Biosystems & Biorobotics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 427–430.
  8. Q Shao, 2008, A biomechanical model to estimate corrective changes in muscle activation patterns for stroke patients, Journal of biomechanics, 41, 3097, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.015 · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.015
  9. S Martelli, 2011, Effect of sub-optimal neuromotor control on the hip joint load during level walking, J Biomech, 44, 1716, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.039 · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.039
  10. JL Lanovaz, 2001, Sensitivity of forelimb swing phase inverse dynamics to inertial parameter errors, Equine Vet J Suppl, 27, 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05353.x · doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2001.tb05353.x
  11. SS Blemker, 2007, Image-based musculoskeletal modeling: applications, advances, and future opportunities, J Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 25, 441, 10.1002/jmri.20805 · doi:10.1002/jmri.20805
  12. LL Menegaldo, 2012, The influence of modeling hypothesis and experimental methodologies in the accuracy of muscle force estimation using EMG-driven models, Multibody System Dynamics, 28, 21, 10.1007/s11044-011-9273-8 · doi:10.1007/s11044-011-9273-8

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Sartori, M., Reggiani, M., Farina, D., & Lloyd, D. G.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2012-12-26
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
e52618
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017226208
Cited by
330
References
35
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EMG-Driven Forward-Dynamic Estimation of Muscle Force and Joint Moment about Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Human Lower Extremity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0052618
The paper
Sartori, M., Reggiani, M., Farina, D., & Lloyd, D. G. (2012). EMG-Driven Forward-Dynamic Estimation of Muscle Force and Joint Moment about Multiple Degrees of Freedom in the Human Lower Extremity. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052618

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.