Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Price of Tumor Control: An Analysis of Rare Side Effects of Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma from the Ipilimumab Network

Open access
Voskens, Caroline J., Goldinger, Simone M., Loquai, Carmen, Robert, Caroline, Kaehler, Katharina C., Berking, Carola, Bergmann, Tanja, Bockmeyer, Clemens L., Eigentler, Thomas, Fluck, Michael, Garbe, Claus, Gutzmer, Ralf, Grabbe, Stephan, Hauschild, Axel, Hein, Rüdiger, Hundorfean, Gheorghe, Justich, Armin, Keller, Ullrich, Klein, Christina, Mateus, Christine, Mohr, Peter, Paetzold, Sylvie, Satzger, Imke, Schadendorf, Dirk, Schlaeppi, Marc, Schuler, Gerold, Schuler-Thurner, Beatrice, Trefzer, Uwe, Ulrich, Jens, Vaubel, Julia, von Moos, Roger, Weder, Patrik, Wilhelm, Tabea, Göppner, Daniela, Dummer, Reinhard, Heinzerling, Lucie M.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blocking antibody, has been approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and induces adverse events (AE) in up to 64% of patients. Treatment algorithms for the management of common ipilimumab-induced AEs have lead to a reduction of morbidity, e.g. due to bowel perforations. However, the spectrum of less common AEs is expanding as ipilimumab is increasingly applied. Stringent recognition and management of AEs will reduce drug-induced morbidity and costs, and thus, positively impact the cost-benefit ratio of the drug. To facilitate timely identification and adequate management data on rare AEs were analyzed at 19 skin cancer centers. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Patient files (n = 752) were screened for rare ipilimumab-associated AEs. A total of 120 AEs, some of which were life-threatening or even fatal, were reported and summarized by organ system describing the most instructive cases in detail. Previously unreported AEs like drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), granulomatous inflammation of the central nervous system, and aseptic meningitis, were documented. Obstacles included patientś delay in reporting symptoms and the differentiation of steroid-induced from ipilimumab-induced AEs under steroid treatment. Importantly, response rate was high in this patient population with tumor regression in 30.9% and a tumor control rate of 61.8% in stage IV melanoma patients despite the fact that some patients received only two of four recommended ipilimumab infusions. This suggests that ipilimumab-induced antitumor responses can have an early onset and that severe autoimmune reactions may reflect overtreatment. CONCLUSION: The wide spectrum of ipilimumab-induced AEs demands doctor and patient awareness to reduce morbidity and treatment costs and true ipilimumab success is dictated by both objective tumor responses and controlling severe side effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0053745

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Voskens, C. J., Goldinger, S. M., Loquai, C., Robert, C., Kaehler, K. C., Berking, C., Bergmann, T., Bockmeyer, C. L., Eigentler, T., Fluck, M., Garbe, C., Gutzmer, R., Grabbe, S., Hauschild, A., Hein, R., Hundorfean, G., Justich, A., Keller, U., Klein, C., Mateus, C., Mohr, P., Paetzold, S., Satzger, I., Schadendorf, D., Schlaeppi, M., Schuler, G., Schuler-Thurner, B., Trefzer, U., Ulrich, J., Vaubel, J., von Moos, R., Weder, P., Wilhelm, T., Göppner, D., Dummer, R., & Heinzerling, L. M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-01-14
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e53745
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002673340
Cited by
468
References
7
FWCI
21.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.