Cited by 62Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationMultisensory perception and integration

Visual and Non-Visual Contributions to the Perception of Object Motion during Self-Motion

Open access
Fajen, Brett R., Matthis, Jonathan S.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Many locomotor tasks involve interactions with moving objects. When observer (i.e., self-)motion is accompanied by object motion, the optic flow field includes a component due to self-motion and a component due to object motion. For moving observers to perceive the movement of other objects relative to the stationary environment, the visual system could recover the object-motion component - that is, it could factor out the influence of self-motion. In principle, this could be achieved using visual self-motion information, non-visual self-motion information, or a combination of both. In this study, we report evidence that visual information about the speed (experiment 1) and direction (experiment 2) of self-motion plays a role in recovering the object-motion component even when non-visual self-motion information is also available. However, the magnitude of the effect was less than one would expect if subjects relied entirely on visual self-motion information. Taken together with previous studies, we conclude that when self-motion is real and actively generated, both visual and non-visual self-motion information contribute to the perception of object motion. We also consider the possible role of this process in visually guided interception and avoidance of moving objects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0055446

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensory input cannot be meaningfully interpreted without correcting for self-motion.

    “Sensory input cannot be meaningfully interpreted without correcting for self-motion [29–32]”

    From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Abstract and Discussion explain that perceiving object motion during self-motion involves factoring out the influence of self-motion on optic flow. The cited paper supports that specific visual-perception point, but it does not establish that all sensory input cannot be meaningfully interpreted without such correction. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Sedgwick HA (1980) The geometry of spatial layout in pictorial representation. In: Hagen M, editor. The perception of pictures VI. New York: Academic Press. 33–90.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fajen, B. R., & Matthis, J. S.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Fajen, Brett R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-02-07
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
e55446
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090454623
Cited by
62
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey019317-04, 1R01EY019317)
  • National Eye Institute (R01 EY019317, 1R01EY019317)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
self-motion perception, object motion perception, optical flow, movement speed, moving observer
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Motion, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review