Towards Integrated Physical Activity Profiling
Open accessAbstract
Recently, there has been some discussion of whether it is possible to score highly in one dimension of physical activity behaviour (e.g., moderate intensity exercise) whilst also scoring poorly in another (e.g., sedentary time). Interestingly, direct empirical observations to support these proposals are lacking. New technologies now enable the capture of physical activity thermogenesis on a minute-by-minute basis and over a sustained period. We used one of the best available technologies to explore whether individuals can score differently in various physiologically-important physical activity dimensions. We determined minute-by-minute physical activity energy expenditure over 7 days in 100 men aged 28 ± 9 years. We used combined accelerometry and heart rate with branched equation modelling to estimate energy expenditure and extracted data for key physical activity outcomes and descriptors. Although some physical activity outcomes were tightly correlated, the attainment of one threshold for a given physical activity dimension did not automatically predict how well an individual scored in another dimension (with bivariate correlations ranging from 0.05 to 0.96). In one illustrative example of this heterogeneity, although 41 men showed a relatively low Physical Activity Level (total energy expenditure/resting energy expenditure ≤ 1.75), only 17% (n=7) of these men showed consistently low physical activity across other dimensions (moderate intensity activity, vigorous intensity activity, and sedentary time). Thus, physical activity is highly heterogeneous and there is no single outcome measure that captures all the relevant information about a given individual. We propose that future studies need to capture (rather than ignore) the different physiologically-important dimensions of physical activity via generation of integrated, multidimensional physical activity 'profiles'.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Laboratory protocols tend to overemphasise active elements of daily living, relative to the reported 52% sedentary time from 24 hour measured activity in young men.
“However, laboratory protocols tend to overemphasise active elements of daily living, relative to the reported 52% sedentary time from 24 hour measured activity in young men [44].”
From Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors (2017) · cites this paper as [44]
Using precise and sensitive activity monitors might seem robust, but there are a number of considerations when interpreting this information.
“Although using precise and sensitive activity monitors might seem robust, there are a number of considerations when interpreting this information (Thompson and Batterham 2013; Thompson et al. 2009).”
From Is immunosenescence influenced by our lifetime “dose” of exercise? (2016) · cites this paper as Thompson and Batterham 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 53
- Authors
- Thompson, D., & Batterham, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- Teesside University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thompson, Dylan
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-02-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e56427
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3577906
- OpenAlex
- W2079422738
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Alzheimer's Society
- Alzheimer's Research Trust
- Cancer Research UK
- British Heart Foundation
- Diabetes UK
- Stroke Association
- Public Health Agency
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Medical Research Council (MR/J00040X/1)
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
- World Cancer Research Fund
- Health and Social Care Research and Development Division
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- physical activity profiles, physical activity energy expenditure, moderate-intensity exercise, high-intensity exercise, sedentary time, physical activity level, accelerometry, heart rate
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Basal Metabolism, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Male, Motor Activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review