CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 148Fungal Infections and StudiesGenetic diversity and population structurePlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phylogenetic analysis reveals a cryptic species Blastomyces gilchristii, sp. nov. within the human pathogenic fungus Blastomyces dermatitidis.

Open access
Brown, Elizabeth M., McTaggart, Lisa R., Zhang, Sean X., Low, Donald E., Stevens, David A., Richardson, Susan E.·2013·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059237PMC PMC3606480
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of the population genetic structure of microbial species is of fundamental importance to many scientific disciplines because it can identify cryptic species, reveal reproductive mode, and elucidate processes that contribute to pathogen evolution. Here, we examined the population genetic structure and geographic differentiation of the sexual, dimorphic fungus Blastomyces dermatitidis, the causative agent of blastomycosis. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Criteria for Genealogical Concordance Phylogenetic Species Recognition (GCPSR) applied to seven nuclear loci (arf6, chs2, drk1, fads, pyrF, tub1, and its-2) from 78 clinical and environmental isolates identified two previously unrecognized phylogenetic species. Four of seven single gene phylogenies examined (chs2, drk1, pyrF, and its-2) supported the separation of Phylogenetic Species 1 (PS1) and Phylogenetic Species 2 (PS2) which were also well differentiated in the concatenated chs2-drk1-fads-pyrF-tub1-arf6-its2 genealogy with all isolates falling into one of two evolutionarily independent lineages. Phylogenetic species were genetically distinct with interspecific divergence 4-fold greater than intraspecific divergence and a high Fst value (0.772, P<0.001) indicative of restricted gene flow between PS1 and PS2. Whereas panmixia expected of a single freely recombining population was not observed, recombination was detected when PS1 and PS2 were assessed separately, suggesting reproductive isolation. Random mating among PS1 isolates, which were distributed across North America, was only detected after partitioning isolates into six geographic regions. The PS2 population, found predominantly in the hyper-endemic regions of northwestern Ontario, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, contained a substantial clonal component with random mating detected only among unique genotypes in the population. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These analyses provide evidence for a genetically divergent clade within Blastomyces dermatitidis, which we use to describe a novel species, Blastomyces gilchristii sp. nov. In addition, we discuss the value of population genetic and phylogenetic analyses as a foundation for disease surveillance, understanding pathogen evolution, and discerning phenotypic differences between phylogenetic species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0059237

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Genealogies of the seven MLST gene loci sequenced for 78 isolates of B. dermatitidis. Majority consensus maximum parsimony (MP) trees were constructed for each MLST locus region. (a) chs2, (b) drk1, (c) fads, (d) pyrF, (e) tub1, (f) arf6, and (g) its2. Isolates are coded by geographic region of isolation. For each group, the size of the patterned sector is proportional to the number of isolates from that geographic region. Values along branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap values (MPB) and Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values respectively. Branch values are provided where MP and Bayesian tree topology were in agreement.
Figure 1 Genealogies of the seven MLST gene loci sequenced for 78 isolates of B. dermatitidis. Majority consensus maximum parsimony (MP) trees were constructed for each MLST locus region. (a) chs2, (b) drk1, (c) fads, (d) pyrF, (e) tub1, (f) arf6, and (g) its2. Isolates are coded by geographic region of isolation. For each group, the size of the patterned sector is proportional to the number of isolates from that geographic region. Values along branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap values (MPB) and Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values respectively. Branch values are provided where MP and Bayesian tree topology were in agreement.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Maximum-parsimony tree constructed from the concatenated sequences of seven nuclear genes (chs2-drk1-fads-pyrF-tub1-arf6-its2). A majority consensus mid-point rooted maximum parsimony (MP) tree was constructed based on the concatenated sequence of seven MLST gene loci. The MP tree is displayed without logarithmic scaling so that genetic distance and geographic region of isolation could be viewed. Values along branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap values (MPB) and Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values respectively. Values for branches partitioning less than three isolates or those with MPB ≤70 and BPP≤0.95 are not shown. The tree is displayed with pattern coding for geographic regions as described in Figure 1. The MP tree displays a partition in the current species B. dermatitidis into two phylogenetic species: B. dermatitidis (PS1, clade 1) and B. gilchristii (PS2, clade 2).
Figure 2 Maximum-parsimony tree constructed from the concatenated sequences of seven nuclear genes (chs2-drk1-fads-pyrF-tub1-arf6-its2). A majority consensus mid-point rooted maximum parsimony (MP) tree was constructed based on the concatenated sequence of seven MLST gene loci. The MP tree is displayed without logarithmic scaling so that genetic distance and geographic region of isolation could be viewed. Values along branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap values (MPB) and Bayesian posterior probability (BPP) values respectively. Values for branches partitioning less than three isolates or those with MPB ≤70 and BPP≤0.95 are not shown. The tree is displayed with pattern coding for geographic regions as described in Figure 1. The MP tree displays a partition in the current species B. dermatitidis into two phylogenetic species: B. dermatitidis (PS1, clade 1) and B. gilchristii (PS2, clade 2).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Parsimony Tree Permutation Length Test (PTPLT). A frequency distribution of tree lengths of maximum parsimony trees for 1000 artificially recombined datasets as compared to the observed tree length was calculated for: (a) All isolates in the B. dermatitidis population treated as a single population both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (b) All isolates partitioned into two phylogenetic species (PS1) and (PS2) both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (c) All isolates partitioned into 6 geographic regions both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (d) Isolates of PS1 treated as a single population, partitioned into 6 geographic regions both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (e) Isolates of PS2 treated as a single population, partitioned into 4 geographic regions, or reduced to unique genotypes (due to the low number of unique genotypes in PS2, we were unable to partition them by geographic region). Recombination was not detected between PS1 and PS2. Recombination was detected in PS1 (d) when partitioned by geographic region and reduced to unique genotypes and in PS2 (e) when reduced to unique genotypes.
Figure 3 Parsimony Tree Permutation Length Test (PTPLT). A frequency distribution of tree lengths of maximum parsimony trees for 1000 artificially recombined datasets as compared to the observed tree length was calculated for: (a) All isolates in the B. dermatitidis population treated as a single population both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (b) All isolates partitioned into two phylogenetic species (PS1) and (PS2) both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (c) All isolates partitioned into 6 geographic regions both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (d) Isolates of PS1 treated as a single population, partitioned into 6 geographic regions both with and without reduction to unique genotypes; (e) Isolates of PS2 treated as a single population, partitioned into 4 geographic regions, or reduced to unique genotypes (due to the low number of unique genotypes in PS2, we were unable to partition them by geographic region). Recombination was not detected between PS1 and PS2. Recombination was detected in PS1 (d) when partitioned by geographic region and reduced to unique genotypes and in PS2 (e) when reduced to unique genotypes.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Phylogenetic network analysis of the B. dermatitidis. Split decomposition analysis was performed using the pairwise genetic distances of the concatenated chs2-drk1-fads-pyrF-tub1-arf6-its2 sequences. Isolated split networks within B. gilchristii (PS2) suggests recombination within the B. gilchristii (PS2) but not between both populations. Bootstrapping values less than ≤0.75 are not shown.
Figure 4 Phylogenetic network analysis of the B. dermatitidis. Split decomposition analysis was performed using the pairwise genetic distances of the concatenated chs2-drk1-fads-pyrF-tub1-arf6-its2 sequences. Isolated split networks within B. gilchristii (PS2) suggests recombination within the B. gilchristii (PS2) but not between both populations. Bootstrapping values less than ≤0.75 are not shown.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Geographic distribution of B. dermatitidis phylogenetic species across Ontario, Canada and Wisconsin, USA. Phylogenetic species are represented by circles with light grey (B. dermatitidis, PS1) and solid (B. gilchristii, PS2) fill corresponding to each phylogenetic species. Circle size is proportional to the number of isolates from each geographic site.
Figure 5 Geographic distribution of B. dermatitidis phylogenetic species across Ontario, Canada and Wisconsin, USA. Phylogenetic species are represented by circles with light grey (B. dermatitidis, PS1) and solid (B. gilchristii, PS2) fill corresponding to each phylogenetic species. Circle size is proportional to the number of isolates from each geographic site.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. TC Gilchrist, 1894, Protozoan dermatitis, J Cutan Gen Dis, 12, 496

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 148

Related

Metadata

Authors
Brown, E. M., McTaggart, L. R., Zhang, S. X., Low, D. E., Stevens, D. A., & Richardson, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
  • Public Health Ontario (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
McTaggart, Lisa R.
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
e59237
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0059237
PMC
PMC3606480
OpenAlex
W2033915514
Cited by
148
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2016-12-09)
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Northwestern University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Blastomyces dermatitidis, cryptic species, blastomycosis, population structure, phylogenetic species recognition, territorial differentiation, recombination, reproductive isolation, clonal populations, nuclear loci, pathogen evolution, disease surveillance
MeSH terms
Blastomyces, DNA, Fungal, Genetics, Population, Humans, Phylogeny, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review