The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Subcortical Source Localization Using Deep Brain Activity Imaging Model with Minimum Norm Operators: A MEG Study
Open accessAbstract
Subcortical structures are involved in many healthy and pathological brain processes. It is crucial for many studies to use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assess the ability to detect subcortical generators. This study aims to assess the source localization accuracy and to compare the characteristics of three inverse operators in the specific case of subcortical generators. MEG has a low sensitivity to subcortical sources mainly because of their distance from sensors and their complex cyto-architecture. However, we show that using a realistic anatomical and electrophysiological model of deep brain activity (DBA), the sources make measurable contributions to MEG sensors signals. Furthermore, we study the point-spread and cross-talk functions of the wMNE, sLORETA and dSPM inverse operators to characterize distortions in cortical and subcortical regions and to study how noise-normalization methods can improve or bias accuracy. We then run Monte Carlo simulations with neocortical and subcortical activations. In the case of single hippocampus patch activations, the results indicate that MEG can indeed localize the generators in the head and the body of the hippocampus with good accuracy. We then tackle the question of simultaneous cortical and subcortical activations. wMNE can detect hippocampal activations that are embedded in cortical activations that have less than double their amplitude, but it does not completely correct the bias to more superficial sources. dSPM and sLORETA can still detect hippocampal activity above this threshold, but such detection might include the creation of ghost deeper sources. Finally, using the DBA model, we showed that the detection of weak thalamic modulations of ongoing brain activity is possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency
Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998 · Cited by 10,490
Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain
Mantini, D., Perrucci, M. G., Del Gratta, C., Romani, G. L., & Corbetta, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700668104 · Cited by 1,938
The Human Hippocampus: Functional Anatomy, Vascularization and Serial Sections with MRI
Duvernoy, H. M. (2005) · doi:10.1007/b138576 · Cited by 350
Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging
Jerbi, K., Lachaux, J.-P., N′Diaye, K., Pantazis, D., Leahy, R. M., Garnero, L., & Baillet, S. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609632104 · Cited by 289
Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum ℓ2-norm estimation
Molins, A., Stufflebeam, S. M., Brown, E. N., & Hämäläinen, M. S. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.064 · Cited by 192
Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure
Okada, Y. C., Wu, J., & Kyuhou, S. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00043-6 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Magnetoencephalography for Brain Electrophysiology and Imaging
Baillet, S. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4504 · Cited by 992
Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG
Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11070 · Cited by 389
Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer-like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns
Barascud, N., Pearce, M. T., Griffiths, T. D., Friston, K. J., & Chait, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508523113 · Cited by 296
Subcortical electrophysiological activity is detectable with high-density EEG source imaging
Seeber, M., Cantonas, L.-M., Hoevels, M., Sesia, T., Visser-Vandewalle, V., & Michel, C. M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08725-w · Cited by 294
Episodic sequence memory is supported by a theta-gamma phase code
Heusser, A. C., Poeppel, D., Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4374 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Attal, Y., & Schwartz, D.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-03-20
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e59856
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046592570
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Subcortical Source Localization Using Deep Brain Activity Imaging Model with Minimum Norm Operators: A MEG Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0059856
- The paper
- Attal, Y., & Schwartz, D. (2013). Assessment of Subcortical Source Localization Using Deep Brain Activity Imaging Model with Minimum Norm Operators: A MEG Study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059856
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.