Cited by 352Memory and Neural MechanismsMedical and Biological SciencesAnatomy and Medical Technology

The Human Hippocampus: Functional Anatomy, Vascularization and Serial Sections with MRI

Duvernoy, Henri M.·2005·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b138576

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hippocampus is not a homogeneous structure but consists of several histologically and functionally specialized but tightly interconnected subfields: the subiculum (SUB), the cornu ammonis sectors (CA) 1-3, and the dentate gyrus (DG).

    “However, the hippocampus is not a homogeneous structure but consists of several histologically and functionally specialized but tightly interconnected subfields: the subiculum (SUB), the cornu ammonis sectors (CA) 1–3, and the dentate gyrus (DG) (Duvernoy, 2005).”
  • The hippocampus is not a unitary anatomical formation; several subfields have been identified, differentiable on histological grounds and by functional role in memory encoding and retrieval.

    “The hippocampus is not, however, a unitary anatomical formation. Several subfields have been identified, which can be differentiated on both histological grounds [2], [8] and according to their functional role in memory encoding and retrieval [9], [10].”
  • Automated methods used geometric rules as criteria for defining subfields, whereas manual segmentation and 3D surface reconstruction methods used anatomical points derived from central nervous system atlases.

    “Automated methods used geometric rules as the criteria for defining subfields, whereas manual segmentation and 3D surface reconstruction methods used anatomical points derived from central nervous system atlases (e.g., [8]).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duvernoy, H. M.
Corresponding author
Duvernoy, Henri M.
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
2005
OpenAlex
W4213069698
Cited by
350
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.26
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
human hippocampus, hippocampal anatomy, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, hippocampal subfields

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review