Cited by 163Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationPlant Molecular Biology Research

Maize Gene Atlas Developed by RNA Sequencing and Comparative Evaluation of Transcriptomes Based on RNA Sequencing and Microarrays

Open access
Sekhon, Rajandeep S., Briskine, Roman, Hirsch, Candice N., Myers, Chad L., Springer, Nathan M., Buell, C. Robin, de Leon, Natalia, Kaeppler, Shawn M.·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Transcriptome analysis is a valuable tool for identification and characterization of genes and pathways underlying plant growth and development. We previously published a microarray-based maize gene atlas from the analysis of 60 unique spatially and temporally separated tissues from 11 maize organs [1]. To enhance the coverage and resolution of the maize gene atlas, we have analyzed 18 selected tissues representing five organs using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). For a direct comparison of the two methodologies, the same RNA samples originally used for our microarray-based atlas were evaluated using RNA-Seq. Both technologies produced similar transcriptome profiles as evident from high Pearson's correlation statistics ranging from 0.70 to 0.83, and from nearly identical clustering of the tissues. RNA-Seq provided enhanced coverage of the transcriptome, with 82.1% of the filtered maize genes detected as expressed in at least one tissue by RNA-Seq compared to only 56.5% detected by microarrays. Further, from the set of 465 maize genes that have been historically well characterized by mutant analysis, 427 show significant expression in at least one tissue by RNA-Seq compared to 390 by microarray analysis. RNA-Seq provided higher resolution for identifying tissue-specific expression as well as for distinguishing the expression profiles of closely related paralogs as compared to microarray-derived profiles. Co-expression analysis derived from the microarray and RNA-Seq data revealed that broadly similar networks result from both platforms, and that co-expression estimates are stable even when constructed from mixed data including both RNA-Seq and microarray expression data. The RNA-Seq information provides a useful complement to the microarray-based maize gene atlas and helps to further understand the dynamics of transcription during maize development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0061005

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RNA-seq has a higher resolution for identifying tissue-specific expression and distinguishes expression profiles of closely related paralogues better than microarray-derived profiles.

    “It increases accuracy for low-abundance transcripts [44], has a higher resolution for identifying tissue-specific expression and distinguishes expression profiles of closely related paralogues better than microarray-derived profiles [45].”
  • Few conclusions have been drawn about the utility of RNA-seq co-expression networks.

    “Very few analyses to date have been performed on co-expression networks from RNA-seq data (although see, e.g.Iancu et al., 2012;Sekhon et al., 2013), with fewer conclusions drawn about their utility, nor has their presumed novelty been fully assessed.”
  • The presumed novelty of RNA-seq co-expression networks has not been fully assessed.

    “Very few analyses to date have been performed on co-expression networks from RNA-seq data (although see, e.g.Iancu et al., 2012;Sekhon et al., 2013), with fewer conclusions drawn about their utility, nor has their presumed novelty been fully assessed.”
  • Very few analyses of co-expression networks from RNA-seq data have been performed.

    “Very few analyses to date have been performed on co-expression networks from RNA-seq data (although see, e.g.Iancu et al., 2012;Sekhon et al., 2013), with fewer conclusions drawn about their utility, nor has their presumed novelty been fully assessed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Paulis JW, Wall JS (1977) Comparison of the protein compositions of selected corns and their wild relatives, teosinte and Tripsacum. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 25: 265– 270.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekhon, R. S., Briskine, R., Hirsch, C. N., Myers, C. L., Springer, N. M., Buell, C. R., de Leon, N., & Kaeppler, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kaeppler, Shawn M.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-04-23
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
e61005
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2033579591
Cited by
163
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1126950, 0953881)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (FC02-07ER64494, 07ER64494, DEFC0207ER64494)
  • Office of Science (FC02-07ER64494, DEFC0207ER64494)
  • Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DE‐FC02‐07ER64494)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (DE-FC02-07ER64494)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
transcriptome, RNA sequencing, microarray comparison, tissue-specific gene expression, co-expression network, maize development, gene expression profiling, maize
MeSH terms
Zea mays, Genes, Plant, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review