Cited by 28Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

A factor analysis of global GABAergic gene expression in human brain identifies specificity in response to chronic alcohol and cocaine exposure

Open access
Enoch, Mary-Anne, Baghal, Basel, Yuan, Qiaoping, Goldman, David·2013·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Although expression patterns of GABAergic genes in rodent brain have largely been elucidated, no comprehensive studies have been performed in human brain. The purpose of this study was to identify global patterns of GABAergic gene expression in healthy adults, including trans and cis effects in the GABAA gene clusters, before determining the effects of chronic alcohol and cocaine exposure on gene expression in the hippocampus. RNA-Seq data from 'BrainSpan' was obtained across 16 brain regions from postmortem samples from nine adults. A factor analysis was performed on global expression of 21 GABAergic pathway genes. Factor specificity for response to chronic alcohol/cocaine exposure was subsequently determined from the analysis of RNA-Seq data from postmortem hippocampus of eight alcoholics, eight cocaine addicts and eight controls. Six gene expression factors were identified. Most genes loaded (≥0.5) onto one factor; six genes loaded onto two. The largest factor (0.30 variance) included the chromosome 5 gene cluster that encodes the most common GABAA receptor, α1β2γ2, and genes encoding the α3β3γ2 receptor. Genes within this factor were largely unresponsive to chronic alcohol/cocaine exposure. In contrast, the chromosome 4 gene cluster factor (0.14 variance) encoding the α2β1γ1 receptor was influenced by chronic alcohol/cocaine exposure. Two other factors (0.17 and 0.06 variance) showed expression changes in alcoholics/cocaine addicts; these factors included genes involved in GABA synthesis and synaptic transport. Finally there were two factors that included genes with exceptionally low (0.10 variance) and high (0.09 variance) expression in the cerebellum; the former factor was unaffected by alcohol/cocaine exposure. This study has shown that there appears to be specificity of GABAergic gene groups, defined by covariation in expression, for response to chronic alcohol/cocaine exposure. These findings might have implications for combating stress-related craving and relapse.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0064014

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human genetics studies have noted associations between GABAAR genes and different aspects of alcoholism.

    “Human genetics studies have noted associations between GABAAR genes and different aspects of alcoholism [93-98].”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [97]

  • GABAARs in brain reward circuits may be involved in the development of brain changes that mediate the addictive properties of drugs in general.

    “The involvement of GABAAR genes in the abuse of and dependence on drugs that do not directly affect the GABAARs suggest that the GABAARs in brain reward circuits may be involved in the development of brain changes that mediate the addictive properties of drugs in general.”

    From An emerging circuit pharmacology of GABAA receptors (2018) · cites this paper as [97]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enoch, M.-A., Baghal, B., Yuan, Q., & Goldman, D.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Enoch, Mary-Anne
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2013-05-22
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e64014
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089851966
Cited by
28
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA000305-09, Z01AA000305)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
chronic ethanol exposure, cocaine exposure, alcoholism, cocaine dependence, hippocampus, GABA synthesis, postmortem brain, BrainSpan, cerebellum, relapse
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ethanol, Alcoholism, Cerebellum, Cocaine, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Receptors, GABA-A, Gene Expression, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Alcoholics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review