The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services
Open accessAbstract
Altmetric measurements derived from the social web are increasingly advocated and used as early indicators of article impact and usefulness. Nevertheless, there is a lack of systematic scientific evidence that altmetrics are valid proxies of either impact or utility although a few case studies have reported medium correlations between specific altmetrics and citation rates for individual journals or fields. To fill this gap, this study compares 11 altmetrics with Web of Science citations for 76 to 208,739 PubMed articles with at least one altmetric mention in each case and up to 1,891 journals per metric. It also introduces a simple sign test to overcome biases caused by different citation and usage windows. Statistically significant associations were found between higher metric scores and higher citations for articles with positive altmetric scores in all cases with sufficient evidence (Twitter, Facebook wall posts, research highlights, blogs, mainstream media and forums) except perhaps for Google+ posts. Evidence was insufficient for LinkedIn, Pinterest, question and answer sites, and Reddit, and no conclusions should be drawn about articles with zero altmetric scores or the strength of any correlation between altmetrics and citations. Nevertheless, comparisons between citations and metric values for articles published at different times, even within the same year, can remove or reverse this association and so publishers and scientometricians should consider the effect of time when using altmetrics to rank articles. Finally, the coverage of all the altmetrics except for Twitter seems to be low and so it is not clear if they are prevalent enough to be useful in practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A 12-month timeframe was deemed appropriate to provide an accurate indication of Altmetric attention score and citations considering there appears to be a quick uptake of attention-based indicators after publication (Thelwall et al., 2013), and that short-term citation counts are highly correlated with long-term citation counts in peer-reviewed research (Liu et al., 2015).”
From Graphical abstracts are associated with greater Altmetric attention scores, but not citations, in sport science (2023) · cites this paper as Thelwall et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“The WoS and Scopus platforms also provide researchers with usage counts for publications, enabling researchers to analyze the usage data and to explore usage patterns (Wang et al., 2016, Thelwall et al., 2013).”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Thelwall et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2012 · Cited by 1,088
Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20677 · Cited by 974
What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey
Bornmann, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22803 · Cited by 732
Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact
Brody, T., Harnad, S. R., & Carr, L. A. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20373 · Cited by 403
Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web
Priem, J. R., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v15i7.2874 · Cited by 382
Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impactPreprint
Priem, J. R., Piwowar, H., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1203.4745 · Cited by 360
Shuai, X., Pepe, A., & Bollen, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047523 · Cited by 327
The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age
Lozano, G. A., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22731 · Cited by 293
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Haustein S (2012) Readership metrics. In: Cronin B, Sugimoto C, editors. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multi-dimensional Indicators of Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, in press.
- Bar-Ilan J (2012a) JASIST@mendeley. Presented at the ACM Web Science Conference Workshop on Altmetrics Evanston, IL. Available: http://altmetricsorg/altmetrics12/bar-ilan. Accessed 21 January 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 908
Sochacki, K. R., Mather, R. C. “., Nwachukwu, B. U., Dong, D., Nho, S. J., Cote, M. P., & Harris, J. D. (2020) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.05.001 · Cited by 24
From Attention to Citation, What and How Does Altmetrics Work?Preprint
Wang, X., Liu, C., Fang, Z., & Mao, W. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.4269 · Cited by 23
Lepez, C. O., Galbán, P. A., Canova-Barrios, C. J., & Machuca‐Contreras, F. (2022) · Metaverse Basic and Applied Research · doi:10.56294/mr202213 · Cited by 22
Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media
Hilbert, F., Barth, J., Gremm, J., Gros, D., Haiter, J., Henkel, M., Reinhardt, W., & Stock, W. G. (2015) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-07-2014-0159 · Cited by 22
Morgan Rouprêt, A., & Misraï, V. (2014) · The French Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.purol.2014.10.009 · Cited by 22
Hong, J. H., Yoon, D. Y., Lim, K. J., Moon, J. Y., Baek, S., Seo, Y. L., & Yun, E. J. (2020) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare8040492 · Cited by 23
User Motivations for Tweeting Research Articles: A Content Analysis Approach
Na, J. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27974-9_20 · Cited by 22
Kousha, K., Thelwall, M. A., & Abdoli, M. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.01.009 · Cited by 22
Self-citationRuano, J., Aguilar-Luque, M., Gómez-García, F. J., Alcalde‐Mellado, P., Gay-Mimbrera, J., Carmona-Fernández, P. J., Maestre-López, B., Sanz-Cabanillas, J. L., Romero, J. L. H., González-Padilla, M., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191124 · Cited by 23
Co‐saved, co‐tweeted, and co‐cited networks
Didegah, F., & Thelwall, M. A. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24028 · Cited by 22
Self-citationHu, K., Gui, Z., Cheng, X., Wu, H., & McClure, S. C. (2019) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi8030118 · Cited by 22
Likes, comments, and shares of marine organism imagery on Facebook
McClain, C. R. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6795 · Cited by 22
Social Networking Sites and Researcher’s Success
Mazurek, G., Górska, A. M., Korzyński, P., & Silva, S. C. L. D. C. E. (2020) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2020.1783724 · Cited by 22
Alternative approaches to assessing scientific results
Мазов, Н. А., & Гуреев, В. Н. (2015) · Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1134/s1019331615010116 · Cited by 22
Quintana, D. S., & Doan, N. T. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15101341 · Cited by 21
Science Mapping Tools and Applications
Chen, C., & Song, M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62543-0_3 · Cited by 22
Mapping social media attention in Microbiology: identifying main topics and actors
Robinson‐García, N., Arroyo‐Machado, W., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2019) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1093/femsle/fnz075 · Cited by 21
Tweet Coupling: a social media methodology for clustering scientific publications
Hassan, S., Aljohani, N. R., Shabbir, M., Ali, U., Iqbal, S., Sarwar, R., Martínez‐Cámara, E., Ventura, S., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03499-1 · Cited by 21
Categorization and correlational analysis of quality factors influencing citation
Khatoon, A., Daud, A. Y., & Amjad, T. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10657-3 · Cited by 29
Social Media, Evidence-Based Tweeting, and JCEHP
Djuricich, A. M. (2014) · Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions · doi:10.1002/chp.21250 · Cited by 21
Thelwall, M., & Fairclough, R. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.05.006 · Cited by 21
Self-citationThe emerging role of social media in urology.
Leveridge, M. (2014) · PubMed Central · Cited by 20
Uso de redes sociales en las revistas científicas de la Universidad de Los Andes
Martinez-Guerrero, C. A. (2017) · e-Ciencias de la Información · doi:10.15517/eci.v8i1.28104 · Cited by 21
Can Twitter increase the visibility of Chinese publications?
Shu, F., Lou, W., & Haustein, S. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2732-8 · Cited by 21
Self-citationResearchGate Score, full-text research items, and full-text reads: a follow-up study
Copiello, S., & Bonifaci, P. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03063-6 · Cited by 21
Ezema, I. J., & Ugwu, C. I. (2019) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-08-2018-0029 · Cited by 21
Mendeley reader counts for US computer science conference papers and journal articles
Thelwall, M. A. (2019) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00010 · Cited by 23
Self-citationMartínez-López, J. I., Barrón-González, S., & López, A. M. (2019) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications7030059 · Cited by 21
Sánchez-Núñez, P., Heras-Pedrosa, C. D. L., & Peláez, J. I. (2020) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci9030023 · Cited by 21
Handbook for Scientometrics: Indicators of science and technology development
Akoev, M., Markusova, V. A., Москалева, О., & Pislyakov, V. V. (2014) · Publishing House of Ural University eBooks · doi:10.15826/b978-5-7996-1352-5.0000 · Cited by 21
Altmetrics of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research
Onyancha, O. B. (2016) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0 · Cited by 20
Lorentzen, D. G. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1227-x · Cited by 20
Ortega, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Altmetrics · doi:10.29024/joa.14 · Cited by 20
Arsalan, M. H., Mubin, O., Mahmud, A. A., Khan, I. A., & Hassan, A. J. (2025) · Metrics · doi:10.3390/metrics2020005 · Cited by 27
Online distribution channel increases article usage on Mendeley: a randomized controlled trial
Kudlow, P. A., Cockerill, M., Toccalino, D., Dziadyk, D. B., Rutledge, A., Shachak, A., McIntyre, R. S., Ravindran, A. V., & Eysenbach, G. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2438-3 · Cited by 19
Altmetrics should not be used for ranking of anaesthesia journals
Fassoulaki, A., Vassi, A., Kardasis, A., & Chantziara, V. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.048 · Cited by 19
Dardas, L. A., Sallam, M., Woodward, A. L., Sweis, N. S., Sweis, N., & Sawair, F. (2023) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications11010005 · Cited by 21
Do Altmetrics Follow the Crowd or Does the Crowd Follow Altmetrics?
Alhoori, H., & Furuta, R. K. (2014) · Cited by 20
Translating Research for Health Policy Decisions: Is It Time for Researchers to Join Social Media?
Meisel, Z. F., Gollust, S. E., & Grande, D. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001182 · Cited by 18
“Getting Attention” Creating and Presenting the Visible, Online, Researcher Self
Cheek, J., & Øby, E. (2018) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800418806593 · Cited by 19
Influential tweeters in relation to highly cited articles in altmetric big data
Hassan, S., Bowman, T. D., Shabbir, M., Akhtar, A., Imran, M., & Aljohani, N. R. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03044-9 · Cited by 19
Drongstrup, D., Malik, S., Aljohani, N. R., Alelyani, S., Safder, I., & Hassan, S. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03613-3 · Cited by 19
Misyura, L., Guardian, E. G., Durant, A. C., & Donini, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234892 · Cited by 19
Ortega, J. L. (2021) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2021.101175 · Cited by 19
What counts: Making sense of metrics of research value
Williams, K. (2022) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scac004 · Cited by 19
Can altmetrics predict future citation counts in critical care medicine publications?
Lehane, D. J., & Black, C. S. (2020) · Journal of the Intensive Care Society · doi:10.1177/1751143720903240 · Cited by 19
Di Girolamo, N., & Reynders, R. M. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.018 · Cited by 18
Yang, S., Xing, X., Qi, F., & Grácio, M. C. C. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03808-8 · Cited by 18
Relevance assessments, bibliometrics, and altmetrics: a quantitative study on PubMed and arXiv
Breuer, T., Schaer, P., & Tunger, D. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04319-4 · Cited by 19
A Scientometric Review of Environmental Valuation Research with an Altmetric Pathway for the Future
Olukolajo, M. A., Oyetunji, A. K., & Amaechi, C. V. (2023) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments10040058 · Cited by 21
Controlled experiment finds no detectable citation bump from Twitter promotion
Branch, T. A., Côté, I. M., David, S. R., Drew, J., Larue, M. A., Márquez, M. C., Parsons, E. C. M., Rabaiotti, D., Shiffman, D. S., Steen, D. A., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292201 · Cited by 18
Altmetrics: A new emerging issue for dental research scientists
Kolahi, J. (2015) · Dental Hypotheses · doi:10.4103/2155-8213.150855 · Cited by 18
Future Trends in the Kinesiology Sciences
Knudson, D. V. (2016) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2016.1184171 · Cited by 18
Benefits and Threats to Using Social Media for Presenting and Implementing Evidence
Cook, C. E., O'Connell, N. E., Hall, T. M., George, S. Z., Jull, G. A., Wright, A. A., Girbés, E. L., Lewis, J. S., & Hancock, M. J. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.0601 · Cited by 18
Banshal, S. K., Basu, A., Singh, V. K., & Muhuri, P. K. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_7 · Cited by 18
The influence of positive news on rumor spreading in social networks with scale-free characteristics
Luo, Y., & Ma, J. (2018) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s012918311850078x · Cited by 18
Boetto, E., Fantini, M. P., Aldo Gangemi, A., Golinelli, D., Greco, M., Nuzzolese, A. G., Presutti, V., & Rallo, F. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03809-7 · Cited by 18
Enkhbayar, A., Haustein, S., Barata, G., & Alperín, J. P. (2020) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00044 · Cited by 18
Self-citationRetrouvey, H., Webster, F., Zhong, T., Gagliardi, A. R., & Baxter, N. N. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040950 · Cited by 19
Impacto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento en la universidad y en la comunicación científica
Duart, J. M., & Andrés, S. M. (2014) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.20.2.4343 · Cited by 18
Using Altmetrics to Support Research Evaluation
Thelwall, M. A. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_2 · Cited by 21
Self-citationDorsch, I., Askeridis, J., & Stock, W. (2018) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications6010007 · Cited by 17
Social media-based sleeping beauties: Defining, identifying and features
Hou, J., & Yang, X. (2020) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2020.101012 · Cited by 18
Araújo, A. C., Gonzalez, G. Z., Nascimento, D. P., & Costa, L. O. P. (2020) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.01.002 · Cited by 17
Weitzel, S. D. R. (2022) · doi:10.21452/abec.2022.isbn.978-65-89167-68-6.012 · Cited by 20
Behnert, C., & Lewandowski, D. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.010 · Cited by 17
Thelwall, M. A., & Wilson, P. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23474 · Cited by 17
Self-citationSotudeh, H., Dehdarirad, T., & Freer, J. (2018) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy003 · Cited by 17
Share or perish: Social media and the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
McNamara, P., & Usher, K. J. (2019) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12600 · Cited by 17
Inciting the metric oriented humanist: Teaching bibliometrics in a faculty of humanities
Zuccala, A. (2016) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-150969 · Cited by 17
Expert Failure: Re-evaluating Research Assessment
Eisen, J. A., MacCallum, C., & Neylon, C. (2013) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001677 · Cited by 16
Nabout, J. C., Teresa, F. B., Machado, K. B., do Prado, V. H. M., Bini, L. M., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2678-x · Cited by 16
Mirzyńska, A., Kosch, O., Schieg, M., Šuhajda, K., & Szarucki, M. (2021) · Technological and Economic Development of Economy · doi:10.3846/tede.2021.15801 · Cited by 16
Altmetrics and their relationship with citation counts: a case of journal articles in physics
Shrivastava, R., & Mahajan, P. (2022) · Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication · doi:10.1108/gkmc-07-2021-0122 · Cited by 16
Evaluative altmetrics: is there evidence for its application to research evaluation?
Arroyo‐Machado, W., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1188131 · Cited by 16
Public science communication on Twitter: a visual analytic approach
Uren, V. S., & Dadzie, A. (2015) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-10-2014-0137 · Cited by 16
Recent trends in biomedical informatics: a study based onJAMIAarticles
Jiang, X., Tse, K., Wang, S., Doan, S., Kim, H., & Lucila Ohno-machado, A. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002429 · Cited by 16
Altmetrics for Medical Educators
Chisolm, M. S. (2016) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-016-0639-3 · Cited by 16
Assessing the Societal Impact of Scientific Research
Silva, P. U. K. D., & Vance, C. K. (2017) · Fascinating life sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_8 · Cited by 16
Making Academic Social Capital Visible
Lutz, C., & Hoffmann, C. P. (2017) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439317721181 · Cited by 16
Wang, X., Cui, Y., Li, Q., & Guo, X. (2017) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2017.00011 · Cited by 16
Maricato, J. D. M., & Martins, D. L. (2018) · Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science · doi:10.5195/biblios.2017.358 · Cited by 16
Jamali, H. R., & Alimohammadi, D. (2015) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE CONTENT DEVELOPMENT & TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.5865/ijkct.2015.5.1.015 · Cited by 16
Impact evaluation of open source software: an Altmetrics perspective
Zhao, R., & Wei, M. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2204-y · Cited by 16
What we can learn from tweets linking to research papers
Liu, X. Z., & Fang, H. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2279-0 · Cited by 16
Who, what, why? An exploration of JoVE scientific video publications in tweets
Xu, S., Yu, H., Hemminger, B. M., & Dong, X. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2880-x · Cited by 16
Understanding the Twitter usage of humanities and social sciences academic journals
Raamkumar, A. S., Erdt, M., Vijayakumar, H., Rasmussen, E., & Theng, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501047 · Cited by 16
Kim, J., Kim, Y., Park, K. M., Yoon, D. Y., & Bae, J. S. (2019) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2019/3748091 · Cited by 16
Wouters, P. F., Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Franssen, T. (2015) · Cited by 16
Self-citationScience as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science
Yin, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, K., Wang, D., & Jones, B. F. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28748 · Cited by 16
The deliverance of open access books : Examining usage and dissemination
Snijder, R. C. (2019) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.26530/oapen_1004809 · Cited by 15
Onyancha, O. B. (2019) · Publishing Research Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s12109-019-09679-z · Cited by 15
From traditional Bibliometrics to Altmetrics: Socialising the research metrics
Bajwa, S. S., & Mehdiratta, L. (2021) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/ija.ija_1058_21 · Cited by 15
Las revistas científicas-académicas y el proceso editorial hacia la ciencia abierta en Uruguay
Jordi, M. D. C. L., Valenzuela, C., Morelli, T., Caubet, Y. F., & Suárez, S. L. P. (2022) · doi:10.21452/abec.2022.isbn.978-65-89167-68-6.014 · Cited by 14
Howoldt, D., Kroll, H., Neuhäusler, P., & Feidenheimer, A. (2022) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04569-2 · Cited by 15
Frixione, E., Ruiz, L., & Hernández, G. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155732 · Cited by 15
Thelwall, M. A. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2704-z · Cited by 15
Self-citationDifference in the impact of open-access papers published by China and the USA
Yang, S., Xing, X., & Wolfram, D. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2697-7 · Cited by 15
Baek, S., Yoon, D. Y., Lim, K. J., Hong, J. H., Moon, J. Y., Seo, Y. L., & Yun, E. J. (2020) · Acta Radiologica · doi:10.1177/0284185120902391 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- Science-Metrix (Canada) (CA)
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thelwall, Mike
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-05-28
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e64841
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3665624
- OpenAlex
- W2073023209
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 15
- FWCI
- 88.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1208804)
- Joint Information Systems Committee
- Arts and Humanities Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- altmetrics, Twitter, social web services, article impact, citation analysis, PubMed articles, sign test, research highlights, mainstream media coverage
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Publishing, Bibliometrics, PubMed, Social Media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review