The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Morphology and Adhesion Mechanism of Octopus vulgaris Suckers
Open accessAbstract
The octopus sucker represents a fascinating natural system performing adhesion on different terrains and substrates. Octopuses use suckers to anchor the body to the substrate or to grasp, investigate and manipulate objects, just to mention a few of their functions. Our study focuses on the morphology and adhesion mechanism of suckers in Octopus vulgaris. We use three different techniques (MRI, ultrasonography, and histology) and a 3D reconstruction approach to contribute knowledge on both morphology and functionality of the sucker structure in O. vulgaris. The results of our investigation are two-fold. First, we observe some morphological differences with respect to the octopus species previously studied (i.e., Octopus joubini, Octopus maya, Octopus bimaculoides/bimaculatus and Eledone cirrosa). In particular, in O. vulgaris the acetabular chamber, that is a hollow spherical cavity in other octopuses, shows an ellipsoidal cavity which roof has an important protuberance with surface roughness. Second, based on our findings, we propose a hypothesis on the sucker adhesion mechanism in O. vulgaris. We hypothesize that the process of continuous adhesion is achieved by sealing the orifice between acetabulum and infundibulum portions via the acetabular protuberance. We suggest this to take place while the infundibular part achieves a completely flat shape; and, by sustaining adhesion through preservation of sucker configuration. In vivo ultrasonographic recordings support our proposed adhesion model by showing the sucker in action. Such an underlying physical mechanism offers innovative potential cues for developing bioinspired artificial adhesion systems. Furthermore, we think that it could possibly represent a useful approach in order to investigate any potential difference in the ecology and in the performance of adhesion by different species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tongues, Tentacles and Trunks: the Biomechanics of Movement in Muscular-Hydrostats
KIER, W. M., & SMITH, K. K. (1985) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01178.x · Cited by 910
Tactile Discrimination of Surface Curvature and Shape by the Octopus
Wells, M. J. (1964) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.41.2.433 · Cited by 46
Cited by
A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi
Baik, S., Kim, D. W., Park, Y., Lee, T.-J., Ho Bhang, S., & Pang, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22382 · Cited by 585
Arzt, E., Quan, H., McMeeking, R. M., & Hensel, R. (2021) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100823 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Tramacere, F., Beccai, L., Kuba, M., Gozzi, A., Bifone, A., & Mazzolai, B.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-06-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e65074
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057567407
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Morphology and Adhesion Mechanism of Octopus vulgaris Suckers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0065074
- The paper
- Tramacere, F., Beccai, L., Kuba, M., Gozzi, A., Bifone, A., & Mazzolai, B. (2013). The Morphology and Adhesion Mechanism of Octopus vulgaris Suckers. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.