CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ligation Bias in Illumina Next-Generation DNA Libraries: Implications for Sequencing Ancient Genomes

Seguin-Orlando, Andaine, Schubert, Mikkel, Clary, Joel, Stagegaard, Julia, Alberdi, Maria T., Prado, José Luis, Prieto, Alfredo, Willerslev, Eske, Orlando, Ludovic·2013·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078575PMC PMC3812280
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0078575

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mappers can show different performance depending on the experimental procedure followed during sample preparation, such as the type of DNA library constructed and whether or not extracts were USER-treated.

    “Mappers can show different performance depending on the experimental procedure followed during sample preparation, such as the type of DNA library constructed 185 and whether or not extracts were USER-treated 184 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [185]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) says library-preparation methods bias read composition and, together with variation in mappability, affect genomic coverage. The Sequence analysis methods (page unavailable) describe using BWA, but the paper does not compare mappers or show that their performance changes with library type. The separate USER-treatment citation is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. RE Green, 2010, A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome, Science, 328, 710, 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  2. D Serre, 2004, No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans, PLoS Biology, 2, E57, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020057 · DOI
  3. HN Poinar, 2006, Metagenomics to paleogenomics: large-scale sequencing of mammoth DNA, Science, 311, 392, 10.1126/science.1123360 · DOI
  4. HA Burbano, 2010, Targeted investigation of the Neandertal genome by array-based sequence capture, Science, 328, 723, 10.1126/science.1188046 · DOI
  5. P Skoglund, 2012, Origins and genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe, Science, 336, 466, 10.1126/science.1216304 · DOI · Paper page
  6. W Miller, 2008, Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth, Nature, 456, 387, 10.1038/nature07446 · DOI
  7. JP Noonan, 2005, Genomic sequencing of Pleistocene cave bears, Science, 309, 597, 10.1126/science.1113485 · DOI
  8. J Krause, 2008, Mitochondrial genomes reveal an explosive radiation of extinct and extant bears near the Miocene-Pliocene boundary, BMC Evol Biol, 8, 220, 10.1186/1471-2148-8-220 · DOI
  9. ML Metzker, 2010, Sequencing technologies – the next generation, Nat Rev Genet, 11, 31, 10.1038/nrg2626 · DOI · Paper page
  10. AW Briggs, 2007, Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 104, 14616, 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. A Hansen, 2001, Statistical evidence for miscoding lesions in ancient DNA templates, Mol Biol Evol, 18, 262, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003800 · DOI
  12. Meyer M, Kircher M (2010) Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb Protoc <comment>doi:10.1101</comment> · DOI
  13. J Krause, 2010, The complete mitochondrial DNA genome of an unknown hominin from southern Siberia, Nature, 464, 894, 10.1038/nature08976 · DOI
  14. L Orlando, 2011, True single-molecule DNA sequencing of a pleistocene horse bone, Genome Res, 21, 1705, 10.1101/gr.122747.111 · DOI
  15. AW Briggs, 2012, Preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries from damaged DNA, Methods Mol Biol, 840, 143, 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_18 · DOI
  16. A Ginolhac, 2012, Improving the performance of true single molecule sequencing for ancient DNA, BMC Genomics, 13, 177, 10.1186/1471-2164-13-177 · DOI
  17. M García-Garcerà, 2011, Fragmentation of Contaminant and Endogenous DNA in Ancient Samples Determined by Shotgun Sequencing; Prospects for Human Palaeogenomics, PLoS One, 6, e24161, 10.1371/journal.pone.0024161 · DOI
  18. AW Briggs, 2010, Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA, Nucleic Acids Res, 38, e87, 10.1093/nar/gkp1163 · DOI · Paper page
  19. MA Quail, 2008, A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system, Nat Methods, 5, 1005, 10.1038/nmeth.1270 · DOI
  20. ME Allentoft, 2012, The half-life of DNA in bone: measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils, Proc Biol Sci, 279, 4724, 10.1098/rspb.2012.1745 · DOI · Paper page
  21. JT Vilstrup, 2013, Mitochondrial Phylogenomics of Modern and Ancient Equids, PLoS One, 8, e55950, 10.1371/journal.pone.0055950 · DOI
  22. N Rohland, 2007, Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth, Nature Protocols, 2, 1756, 10.1038/nprot.2007.247 · DOI
  23. L Orlando, 2009, Revising the recent evolutionary history of equids using ancient DNA, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106, 21754, 10.1073/pnas.0903672106 · DOI
  24. H Li, 2009, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform, Bioinformatics, 25, 1754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  25. S Lindgreen, 2012, AdapterRemoval: easy cleaning of next-generation sequencing reads, BMC Res Notes, 5, 337, 10.1186/1756-0500-5-337 · DOI
  26. Y Benjamini, 2012, Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing, Nucleic Acids Res, 40, e72, 10.1093/nar/gks001 · DOI · Paper page
  27. R Higuchi, 1984, DNA sequences from the quagga, an extinct member of the horse family, Nature, 312, 282, 10.1038/312282a0 · DOI
  28. L Orlando, 2003, Morphological convergence in Hippidion and Equus (Amerhippus) South American equids elucidated by ancient DNA analysis, J Mol Evol, 57, S29, 10.1007/s00239-003-0005-4 · DOI
  29. KI Bos, 2011, A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death, Nature, 478, 506, 10.1038/nature10549 · DOI · Paper page
  30. D Peters, 2011, Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome., N Engl J Med, 365, 1847, 10.1056/NEJMc1106975 · DOI
  31. J Wang, 2012, Genome-wide single-cell analysis of recombination activity and de novo mutation rates in human sperm, Cell, 150, 402, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.030 · DOI
  32. J Dabney, 2012, Length and GC-biases during sequencing library amplification: A comparison of various polymerase-buffer systems with ancient and modern DNA sequencing libraries, BioTechniques, 52, 87, 10.2144/000113809 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kircher M, Stenzel U, Kelso J (2009) Improved base calling for the Illumina Genome Analyzer using machine learning strategies. Genome Biol <comment>doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r83</comment> · DOI
  34. Kircher M, Heyn P, Kelso J (2011) Addressing challenges in the production and analysis of illumina sequencing data. BMC Genomics <comment>doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-382</comment> · DOI
  35. C Bon, 2012, Coprolites as a source of information on the genome and diet of the cave hyena., Proc Biol Sci, 279, 2825, 10.1098/rspb.2012.0358 · DOI
  36. CL Oskam, 2010, Fossil avian eggshell preserves ancient DNA., Proc Biol Sci, 277, 1991, 10.1098/rspb.2009.2019 · DOI
  37. S Overballe-Petersen, 2012, Next-generation sequencing offers new insights into DNA degradation, Trends Biotechnology, 30, 364, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.03.007 · DOI
  38. D Mitchell, 2005, Damage and repair of ancient DNA, Mutat Res, 571, 265, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.060 · DOI
  39. VJ Schuenemann, 2011, Targeted enrichment of ancient pathogens yielding the pPCP1 plasmid of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108, E746, 10.1073/pnas.1105107108 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seguin-Orlando, A., Schubert, M., Clary, J., Stagegaard, J., Alberdi, M. T., Prado, J. L., Prieto, A., Willerslev, E., & Orlando, L.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2013-10-29
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
e78575
ISSN
1932-6203
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0078575
PMC
PMC3812280
Cited by
76
References
11
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review