Comparative metabolite fingerprinting of the rumen system during colonisation of three forage grass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties
Open accessAbstract
The rumen microbiota enable ruminants to degrade complex ligno-cellulosic compounds to produce high quality protein for human consumption. However, enteric fermentation by domestic ruminants generates negative by-products: greenhouse gases (methane) and environmental nitrogen pollution. The current lack of cultured isolates representative of the totality of rumen microbial species creates an information gap about the in vivo function of the rumen microbiota and limits our ability to apply predictive biology for improvement of feed for ruminants. In this work we took a whole ecosystem approach to understanding how the metabolism of the microbial population responds to introduction of its substrate. Fourier Transform Infra Red (FTIR) spectroscopy-based metabolite fingerprinting was used to discriminate differences in the plant-microbial interactome of the rumen when using three forage grass varieties (Lolium perenne L. cv AberDart, AberMagic and Premium) as substrates for microbial colonisation and fermentation. Specific examination of spectral regions associated with fatty acids, amides, sugars and alkanes indicated that although the three forages were apparently similar by traditional nutritional analysis, patterns of metabolite flux within the plant-microbial interactome were distinct and plant genotype dependent. Thus, the utilisation pattern of forage nutrients by the rumen microbiota can be influenced by subtleties determined by forage genotypes. These data suggest that our interactomic approach represents an important means to improve forages and ultimately the livestock environment.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kingston-Smith et al. (2013), using FT-IR spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling, showed that it was possible to discriminate differences in the rumen plant-microbe interactome when three different cultivars of perennial ryegrass were used as substrate.
“Kingston-Smith et al. (2013), using Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FT-IR) spectroscopy-based metabolite profiling, also showed that it was possible to discriminate differences in the rumen plant-microbe interactome when three different cultivars of perennial ryegrass were used as substrate.”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Kingston-Smith et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 17
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [28]Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA, Baird DB, Soutar DM (2007) GenStat® for Windows 9th Edition, Introduction. Hemel Hempstead, UK: VSN International.
- Authors
- Kingston-Smith, A. H., Davies, T. E., Rees Stevens, P., & Mur, L. A. J.
- Affiliations
- Aberystwyth University (GB)
- ORCID
- Mur, Luis A. J.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2013-11-27
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e82801
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3842282
- OpenAlex
- W2121078253
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/W/10964A01B, BB/J0013/1, BBS/E/W/10964A01A, BBS/E/W/10964A01C, grant number BB/J0013/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- rumen microbiota, metabolic fingerprinting, forage grass cultivars, perennial ryegrass, plant-microbe interactions, rumen fermentation, plant genotype effects, rumen fermentation products, methane mitigation, nitrogen pollution, FTIR spectroscopy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Lolium, Rumen, Species Specificity, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review