The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unravelling the Diversity of Grapevine Microbiome
Open accessAbstract
Vitis vinifera is one of the most widely cultivated fruit crops with a great economic impact on the global industry. As a plant, it is naturally colonised by a wide variety of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms that interact with grapevine, having either beneficial or phytopathogenic effects, who play a major role in fruit yield, grape quality and, ultimately, in the evolution of grape fermentation and wine production. Therefore, the objective of this study was to extensively characterize the natural microbiome of grapevine. Considering that the majority of microorganisms are uncultivable, we have deeply studied the microflora of grapevine leaves using massive parallel rDNA sequencing, along its vegetative cycle. Among eukaryotic population the most abundant microorganisms belonged to the early diverging fungi lineages and Ascomycota phylum, whereas the Basidiomycota were the least abundant. Regarding prokaryotes, a high diversity of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria was unveiled. Indeed, the microbial communities present in the vineyard during its vegetative cycle were shown to be highly structured and dynamic. In all cases, the major abundant microorganisms were the yeast-like fungus Aureobasidium and the prokaryotic Enterobacteriaceae. Herein, we report the first complete microbiome landscape of the vineyard, through a metagenomic approach, and highlight the analysis of the microbial interactions within the vineyard and its importance for the equilibrium of the microecosystem of grapevines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection
Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C., & Knight, R. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 · Cited by 15,114
The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis
Cole, J. R., Wang, Q., Cardenas, E., Fish, J., Chai, B., Farris, R. J., Kulam-Syed-Mohideen, A. S., McGarrell, D. M., Marsh, T., Garrity, G. M., et al. (2009) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn879 · Cited by 4,762
Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”
Sogin, M. L., Morrison, H. G., Huber, J. A., Welch, D. M., Huse, S. M., Neal, P. R., Arrieta, J. M., & Herndl, G. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605127103 · Cited by 3,701
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Metagenomics: Application of Genomics to Uncultured Microorganisms
Handelsman, J. (2004) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.68.4.669-685.2004 · Cited by 2,441
Statistical Methods for Detecting Differentially Abundant Features in Clinical Metagenomic Samples
White, J. R., Nagarajan, N., & Pop, M. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000352 · Cited by 1,586
Yeast interactions and wine flavour
Fleet, G. (2003) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(03)00245-9 · Cited by 1,020
Cited by
The Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome
Cregger, M. A., Veach, A. M., Yang, Z. K., Crouch, M. J., Vilgalys, R., Tuskan, G. A., & Schadt, C. W. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0413-8 · Cited by 435
Evolution of ecological dominance of yeast species in high-sugar environments
Williams, K. M., Liu, P., & Fay, J. C. (2015) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12707 · Cited by 59
Oliveira, J. M. M., Henriques, I., Read, D. S., Gweon, H. S., Morgado, R. G., Peixoto, S., Correia, A., Soares, A. M. V. M., & Loureiro, S. (2021) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-021-02477-4 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinto, C., Pinho, D., Sousa, S., Pinheiro, M., Egas, C., & C. Gomes, A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-01-16
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e85622
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970152773
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 23.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unravelling the Diversity of Grapevine Microbiome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0085622
- The paper
- Pinto, C., Pinho, D., Sousa, S., Pinheiro, M., Egas, C., & C. Gomes, A. (2014). Unravelling the Diversity of Grapevine Microbiome. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
