Radiologically isolated syndrome: 5-year risk for an initial clinical event
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the 5-year risk and to identify risk factors for the development of a seminal acute or progressive clinical event in a multi-national cohort of asymptomatic subjects meeting 2009 RIS Criteria. METHODS: Retrospectively identified RIS subjects from 22 databases within 5 countries were evaluated. Time to the first clinical event related to demyelination (acute or 12-month progression of neurological deficits) was compared across different groups by univariate and multivariate analyses utilizing a Cox regression model. RESULTS: Data were available in 451 RIS subjects (F: 354 (78.5%)). The mean age at from the time of the first brain MRI revealing anomalies suggestive of MS was 37.2 years (y) (median: 37.1 y, range: 11-74 y) with mean clinical follow-up time of 4.4 y (median: 2.8 y, range: 0.01-21.1 y). Clinical events were identified in 34% (standard error=3%) of individuals within a 5-year period from the first brain MRI study. Of those who developed symptoms, 9.6% fulfilled criteria for primary progressive MS. In the multivariate model, age [hazard ratio (HR): 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99); p=0.03], sex (male) [HR: 1.93 (1.24-2.99); p=0.004], and lesions within the cervical or thoracic spinal cord [HR: 3.08 (2.06-4.62); p=<0.001] were identified as significant predictors for the development of a first clinical event. INTERPRETATION: These data provide supportive evidence that a meaningful number of RIS subjects evolve to a first clinical symptom. An age <37 y, male sex, and spinal cord involvement appear to be the most important independent predictors of symptom onset.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors predicting increased risk of subsequent MS diagnosis in RIS are similar to those predicting MS diagnosis after a CIS: younger age, higher cerebral lesion load, asymptomatic infratentorial or spinal cord lesions, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, presence of CSF OCBs, and abnormal VEP.
“The factors predicting increased risk of subsequent MS diagnosis are similar to those predicting MS diagnosis after a CIS: younger age, higher cerebral lesion load, asymptomatic infratentorial or spinal cord lesions, gadolinium-enhancing lesions, presence of CSF OCBs, and abnormal VEP. 87,89”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [87]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredYounger age, male gender and gadolinium-enhancing, cortical or spinal cord lesions may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS in RIS patients.
“Younger age, male gender and gadolinium-enhancing, cortical or spinal cord lesions may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS.29- 31”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results identify younger age, male sex, and cervical or thoracic spinal cord lesions as predictors of a first clinical event in RIS. However, Table 4 shows no association for juxtacortical lesions, and the Discussion explicitly says baseline contrast enhancement was not predictive. The paper therefore does not support the cortical-lesion and gadolinium-enhancement parts of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredRIS conversion to MS is most often with a relapsing-remitting course but occasionally with a primary progressive course.
“Approximately one-third of RIS cases are diagnosed with MS within five years of presentation, most often with a relapsingremitting course 83,86 but occasionally with a primary progressive course. 87,88”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria (2018) · cites this paper as [87]
A third of RIS patients will develop clinical symptoms in the first 5 years of follow up (either a relapse or progressive symptoms).
“A third of RIS patients will develop clinical symptoms in the first 5 years of follow up (either a relapse or progressive symptoms).29”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802 · see citing works
Bot, J. C. J., Barkhof, F., à Nijeholt, G. L., van Schaardenburg, D., Voskuyl, A. E., Ader, H. J., Pijnenburg, J. A. L., Polman, C. H., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Vermeulen, E. G. J., et al. (2002) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2231010707 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [1]Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A, Waubant E, Baranzini SE, et al (2009) Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 72: 800– 805. 19073949
- [2]Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, De Seze J, Wiertlievski S, et al (2008) Unexpected multiple sclerosis: follow-up of 30 patients with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical conversion profile. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79: 195– 198. 18202208
- [3]Siva A, Saip S, Altintas A, Jacob A, Keegan BM, et al (2009) Multiple sclerosis risk in radiologically uncovered asymptomatic possible inflammatory-demyelinating disease. Mult Scler 15: 918– 927. 19667020
- [4]Lebrun C, Blanc F, Brassat D, Zephir H, de Seze J, et al (2010) Cognitive function in radiologically isolated syndrome. Mult Scler 16: 919– 925. 20610492
- [5]De Stefano N, Stromillo ML, Rossi F, Battaglini M, Giorgio A, et al (2011) Improving the characterization of radiologically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 6: e19452. 21559385 PMC3084867
- [6]Gabelic T, Radmilovic M, Posavec V, Skvorc A, Boskovic M, et al.. (2012) Differences in oligoclonal bands and visual evoked potentials in patients with radiologically and clinically isolated syndrome. Acta Neurol Belg. 22740024
- [7]Giorgio A, Stromillo ML, Rossi F, Battaglini M, Hakiki B, et al (2011) Cortical lesions in radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 77: 1896– 1899. 22076541
- [8]Gabelic T, Ramasamy DP, Weinstock-Guttman B, Hagemeier J, Kennedy C, et al.. (2013) Prevalence of Radiologically Isolated Syndrome and White Matter Signal Abnormalities in Healthy Relatives of Multiple Sclerosis Patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. PMC7966501 23886745
- [9]Stromillo ML, Giorgio A., Rossi F., Battaglini M., Hakiki B., Malentacchi G., Santangelo M., Gasperini C., Bartolozzi M.L., Portaccio E., Amato M.P., De Stefano, N. (2013) Brain metabolic changes suggestive of axonal damage in radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 23635962
- [10]Lebrun C, Bensa C, Debouverie M, Wiertlevski S, Brassat D, et al (2009) Association between clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in radiologically isolated syndrome and magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential: follow-up of 70 patients. Arch Neurol 66: 841– 846. 19597085
- [11]Lebrun C, Le Page E, Kantarci O, Siva A, Pelletier D, et al (2012) Impact of pregnancy on conversion to clinically isolated syndrome in a radiologically isolated syndrome cohort. Mult Scler 18: 1297– 1302. 22300971
- [12]Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Cree BA, Crabtree EC, Goodin DS, et al (2011) Asymptomatic spinal cord lesions predict disease progression in radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology 76: 686– 692. 21270417 PMC3053327
- [13]Kruit MC, van Buchem MA, Launer LJ, Terwindt GM, Ferrari MD (2010) Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia 30: 129– 136. 19515125 PMC3241741
- [14]Liu S, Kullnat J, Bourdette D, Simon J, Kraemer DF, et al (2013) Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients. Mult Scler 19: 1101– 1105. 23380650
- [16]Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, et al (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357: 1821– 1828. 17978290
- [17]Koch-Henriksen N, Sorensen PS (2010) The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Lancet Neurol 9: 520– 532. 20398859
- [18]Scalfari A, Neuhaus A, Daumer M, Ebers GC, Muraro PA (2011) Age and disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 77: 1246– 1252. 21917763 PMC3179646
- [19]Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Adeleine P (2003) Early clinical predictors and progression of irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis: an amnesic process. Brain 126: 770– 782. 12615637
- [20]Tutuncu M, Tang J, Zeid NA, Kale N, Crusan DJ, et al (2013) Onset of progressive phase is an age-dependent clinical milestone in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19: 188– 198. 22736750 PMC4029334
- [21]Cohen AB, Neema M, Arora A, Dell'oglio E, Benedict RH, et al (2012) The relationships among MRI-defined spinal cord involvement, brain involvement, and disability in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 22: 122– 128. 21447024 PMC3128174
- [22]Oh J, Saidha S, Chen M, Smith SA, Prince J, et al.. (2013) Spinal cord quantitative MRI discriminates between disability levels in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. PMC3589285 23325903
- [24]Sombekke MH, Wattjes MP, Balk LJ, Nielsen JM, Vrenken H, et al (2013) Spinal cord lesions in patients with clinically isolated syndrome: A powerful tool in diagnosis and prognosis. Neurology 80: 69– 75. 23243070
- [25]Tintore M, Rovira A, Arrambide G, Mitjana R, Rio J, et al (2010) Brainstem lesions in clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 75: 1933– 1938. 21098409
- [26]Jacobs LD, Beck RW, Simon JH, Kinkel RP, Brownscheidle CM, et al (2000) Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. CHAMPS Study Group. N Engl J Med 343: 898– 904. 11006365
- [27]Comi G, Martinelli V, Rodegher M, Moiola L, Bajenaru O, et al (2009) Effect of glatiramer acetate on conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (PreCISe study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 374: 1503– 1511. 19815268
- [28]Kappos L, Polman CH, Freedman MS, Edan G, Hartung HP, et al (2006) Treatment with interferon beta-1b delays conversion to clinically definite and McDonald MS in patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Neurology 67: 1242– 1249. 16914693
- [29]McDonnell GV, Cabrera-Gomez J, Calne DB, Li DK, Oger J (2003) Clinical presentation of primary progressive multiple sclerosis 10 years after the incidental finding of typical magnetic resonance imaging brain lesions: the subclinical stage of primary progressive multiple sclerosis may last 10 years. Mult Scler 9: 204– 209. 12708816
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria
Thompson, A. J., Banwell, B. L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W. M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M. S., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30470-2 · Cited by 8,167 · see citing works
Self-citationDiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Prognostic factors for multiple sclerosis symptoms in radiologically isolated syndrome
Fissolo, N., Schaedelin, S., Villar, L. M., Lünemann, J. D., Correale, J., Rejdak, K., Schwab, N., Vilaseca, A., Held, F., García-Merino, A., et al. (2025) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.1481 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Okuda, D. T., Siva, A., Kantarci, O., Inglese, M., Katz, I., Tutuncu, M., Keegan, B. M., Donlon, S., Hua, L. H., Vidal-Jordana, A., Montalban, X., Rovira, A., Tintoré, M., Amato, M. P., Brochet, B., de Seze, J., Brassat, D., Vermersch, P., De Stefano, N., Sormani, M. P., Pelletier, D., Lebrun, C., & on behalf of the Radiologically Isolated Syndrome Consortium (RISC) and Club Francophone de la Sclérose en Plaques (CFSEP)
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Barrow Neurological Institute (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
- University of Florence (IT)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
- Hôpital Purpan (FR)
- Hôpital Roger Salengro (FR)
- University of Genoa (IT)
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Okuda, Darin T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-03-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e90509
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3943959
- OpenAlex
- W2063158442
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 25.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- univOAK (4 institutions : Université de Strasbourg, Université de Haute Alsace, INSA Strasbourg, Bibliothèque Nationale et Universitaire de Strasbourg) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biogen
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
- Acorda Therapeutics
- IC Design Education Center
- Ipsen
- Allergan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- radiologically isolated syndrome, multiple sclerosis, primary progressive multiple sclerosis, risk factors, age, sex differences, spinal cord lesions, demyelination, brain MRI
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Demyelinating Diseases, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Spinal Cord, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Incidental Findings, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review