Cited by 31Gastric Cancer Management and OutcomesHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnostic Yield of the Light Blue Crest Sign in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Wang, Lei, Huang, Wei, Du, Jing, Chen, Youwei, Yang, Jianmin·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of light blue crest(LBC) sign, which was observed by narrow band imaging with magnification endoscopy(NBI-ME), in detecting gastric intestinal metaplasia(IM) has shown variable results. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LBC under NBI-ME for detecting gastric IM. METHODS: We performed a literature search of the Medline/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library Databases; and a meta-analysis of pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and SROC area under the curve, using fixed- and random-effects models, for the accuracy of LBC-based IM diagnosis. RESULTS: We initially included 4 articles, but excluded 1 article to counter significant heterogeneity. When pooled, the remaining 3 articles, which included 247 patients with 721 lesions, showed the following patterns in IM diagnosis: sensitivity: 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.92); specificity: 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), positive likelihood ratio: 8.98 (95% CI 6.42-12.58), negative likelihood ratio: 0.12 (95% CI 0.09-0.16), and SROC area under the curve: 0.9560. LIMITATIONS: As the studies varied by their definitions for positive LBC, endoscopy types, biopsy protocols, race of patient cohort, and physicians' proficiency, some sample sizes were limited so that subgroup analyses could not be performed. CONCLUSION: We concluded that observing LBC under NBI-ME is an accurate and precise means of diagnosing gastric IM.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0092874

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The light blue crest sign is characteristic for intestinal metaplasia, with sensitivity and specificity approximately 90%, and positive and negative likelihood ratio 8.98 and 0.12, respectively, based on one meta-analysis.

    “The “light blue crest” (LBC) sign, defined as fine, blue-white lines on the crests of the epithelial surface (Figure 2G), is characteristic for IM, with sensitivity and specificity approximately 90%, and positive and negative likelihood ratio 8.98 and 0.12, respectively, based on one meta-analysis.58,59”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. JY Fang, 2007, The second national chronic gastritis consensus conference, China chronic gastritis consensus, Modern Digestion & Intervention, 12, 55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Huang, W., Du, J., Chen, Y., & Yang, J.
Affiliations
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Wei
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-03-21
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e92874
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072888348
Cited by
30
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
gastric intestinal metaplasia, narrow-band imaging, magnification endoscopy, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, SROC curve, endoscopic diagnosis
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Humans, Metaplasia, Precancerous Conditions, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review