Cited by 92Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Radiography and ImagingNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

CBCT evaluation of the upper airway morphological changes in growing patients of class II division 1 malocclusion with mandibular retrusion using twin block appliance: a comparative research

Open access
Li, Liang, Liu, Hong, Cheng, Huijuan, Han, Yanzhao, Wang, Chunling, Chen, Yu, Song, Jinlin, Liu, Dongxu·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the morphological changes of upper airway after Twin Block (TB) treatment in growing patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion and mandibular retrusion compared with untreated Class II patients by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty growing patients who have completed TB treatment were recruited into TB group. The control group (n = 30) was selected from the patients with the same diagnosis and without TB treatment. CBCT scans of the pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) data of TB group and control data were collected. After three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and registration of T1 and T2 data, the morphological changes of upper airway during TB treatment were measured. The statistical differences between T1 and T2 data of TB group as well as T2 and control data were accessed by t-test. RESULTS: During the TB treatment, the mandible moved advanced by 3.52 ± 2.14 mm in the horizontal direction and 3.77 ± 2.10 mm in the vertical direction. The hyoid bone was in a more forward and inferior place. The upper airway showed a significant enlargement in nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx. In addition, the nasopharynx turned more circular, and the oropharynx became more elliptic in transverse shape. However, the transverse shape of the hypopharynx showed no significant difference. After comparison between T2 and control data, only the horizontal movement of the hyoid bone, the volumetric expansion of the oropharynx and hypopharynx, and changes of the oropharyngeal transverse shape showed significant difference. CONCLUSION: Compared to the untreated Class II patients, the upper airway of growing patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion and mandibular retrusion showed a significant enlargement in the oropharynx and hypopharynx as well as a more elliptic transverse shape in the oropharynx, and the hyoid bone moved to an anterior position after TB treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0094378

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [21]Deng JR, Gao XM, Zeng XL (2010) Relationship between craniofacial and airway structure and pediatric obstructive sleep apnea and hyponea syndrom es: a case-control study. Journal Of Peking University(Health Sciences) 42: 697– 702. 21170102
  2. [24]Ogutcen-Toller M, Sarac YS, Cakr-Ozkan N, Sarac D, Sakan B (2004) Computerized tomographic evaluation of effects of mandibular anterior repositioning on the upper airway: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 92: 184– 189. 15295329
  3. [34]Fogel RB, Malhotra A, Dalagiorgou G, Robinson MK, Jakab M, et al (2003) Anatomic and physiologic predictors of apnea severity in morbidly obese subjects. Sleep 26: 150– 155. 12683472

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., Liu, H., Cheng, H., Han, Y., Wang, C., Chen, Y., Song, J., & Liu, D.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Song, Jinlin
  • Liu, Dongxu
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-04-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e94378
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037928859
Cited by
92
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Shandong University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Radiography and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
Twin Block appliance, Class II division 1 malocclusion, mandibular retrusion, upper airway morphology, oropharynx, hypopharynx, nasopharynx, hyoid bone position, mandibular advancement, orthodontic treatment, growing patients, cone-beam computed tomography
MeSH terms
Child, Female, Humans, Hypopharynx, Male, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Nasopharynx, Oropharynx, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Retrognathia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review