The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Do Women Prepare for Pregnancy? Preconception Experiences of Women Attending Antenatal Services and Views of Health Professionals
Open accessAbstract
MAIN OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which women plan and prepare for pregnancy. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire survey of pregnant women attending three maternity services in London about knowledge and uptake of preconception care; including a robust measure of pregnancy planning, and phone interviews with a range of health care professionals. MAIN RESULTS: We recruited 1173/1288 (90%) women, median age of 32 years. 73% had clearly planned their pregnancy, 24% were ambivalent and only 3% of pregnancies were unplanned. 51% of all women and 63% of those with a planned pregnancy took folic acid before pregnancy. 21% of all women reported smoking and 61% reported drinking alcohol in the 3 months before pregnancy; 48% of smokers and 41% of drinkers reduced or stopped before pregnancy. The 51% of all women who reported advice from a health professional before becoming pregnant were more likely to adopt healthier behaviours before pregnancy [adjusted odds ratios for greatest health professional input compared with none were 2.34 (95% confidence interval 1.54-3.54) for taking folic acid and 2.18 (95% CI 1.42-3.36) for adopting a healthier diet before pregnancy]. Interviews with 20 health professionals indicated low awareness of preconception health issues, missed opportunities and confusion about responsibility for delivery of preconception care. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDINGS: Despite a high level of pregnancy planning, awareness of preconception health among women and health professionals is low, and responsibility for providing preconception care is unclear. However, many women are motivated to adopt healthier behaviours in the preconception period, as indicated by halving of reported smoking rates in this study. The link between health professional input and healthy behaviour change before pregnancy is a new finding that should invigorate strategies to improve awareness and uptake of pre-pregnancy health care, and bring wider benefits for public health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although some studies suggest that awareness of preconception health and care is low, pregnancy planning appears relatively common, indicating a missed and unexploited opportunity for intervention [56–58].”
From Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although some studies suggest that awareness of preconception health and care is low, pregnancy planning appears relatively common, indicating a missed and unexploited opportunity for intervention [56–58].”
From Associations between periconceptional lifestyle behaviours and adverse pregnancy outcomes (2021) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008
Cantwell, R., Clutton-Brock, T. H., COOPER, G. M., Dawson, A. H., Drife, J., Garrod, D., Harper, A., Hulbert, D., Lucas, S. B., McClure, J. H., et al. (2011) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x · Cited by 3,047
Ben-Shlomo, Y. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.2.285 · Cited by 3,038
Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?
Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Søndergaard, J. (2009) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-52 · Cited by 2,420
Johnson, K., Posner, S. F., Biermann, J., Cordero, J. F., Atrash, H. K., Parker, C. S., Boulet, S. L., & Curtis, M. (2006) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e506902006-001 · Cited by 835
Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., Buklijas, T., Low, F. M., & Beedle, A. S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2009.102 · Cited by 627
Saving Mothers’ Lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008
Wilkinson, H. (2011) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03097.x · Cited by 512
Wellings, K., Jones, K. G., Mercer, C. H., Tanton, C., Clifton, S., Datta, J., Copas, A. J., Erens, B., Gibson, L. J., Macdowall, W. G., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62071-1 · Cited by 478
Self-citationUnintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors
Cheng, D., Schwarz, E. B., Douglas, E., & Horon, I. L. (2008) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.09.009 · Cited by 416
Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy
Barrett, G., Smith, S. C., & Wellings, K. (2004) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2003.014787 · Cited by 372
Self-citationCohort profile: The Southampton Women's Survey
Inskip, H. M., Godfrey, K. M., Robinson, S. M., Law, C., Barker, D. J. P., & Cooper, C. C. (2005) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyi202 · Cited by 328
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- K Johnson, 2006, Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 55, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–211 of 211
Daly, M. P., White, J., Sanders, J., & Kipping, R. R. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21200669
Doherty, E. L., Kingsland, M., Wiggers, J. H., Wolfenden, L., Hall, A., McCrabb, S., Tremain, D., Hollis, J., Licata, M., Wynne, O., et al. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21622406
Okemo, J., Kamya, D., Mwaniki, A. M., & Temmerman, M. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16946372
Maas, V. Y. F., Poels, M., de Kievit, M. H., Hartog, A. P., Franx, A., & Koster, M. P. H. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20341655
Walter, A. W., Julce, C., Sidduri, N., Yinusa-Nyahkoon, L. S., HOWARD, J. M., Reichert, M., Bickmore, T., & Jack, B. W. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12986305
Steel, A., Gibson, H., Adams, J., & Schoenaker, D. A. J. M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25017799
Daly, M. P., White, J., Sanders, J., & Kipping, R. R. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21200660
Hopper, H., Husk, K., Maslin, K., & Shawe, J. (2026) · Women s Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2026.2625250
Self-citationSpiteri, S., Teychenne, M. J., Porter, J., Brown, W. J., & van der Pligt, P. (2026) · Women s Reproductive Health · doi:10.1080/23293691.2026.2637757
Oferta do Cuidado Pré-Concepcional as Mulheres em Unidades Básicas de Saúde
do Nascimento, N., Reis-Muleva, B., Ale, C. C. D. S., Salgueiro, M. M. H. D. A. D. O., & Borges, A. L. V. (2026) · Journal of Interdisciplinary Lifestyle Studies · doi:10.19141/jils.v14ilifestyle.2113
Farasati, M., Mohammadi, E., Nourizadeh, R., & Mehrabi, E. (2026) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/16094069261489389
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephenson, J., Patel, D., Barrett, G., Howden, B., Copas, A., Ojukwu, O., Pandya, P., & Shawe, J.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Brunel University of London (GB)
- University College Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Stephenson, Judith
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e103085
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4109981
- OpenAlex
- W1998100168
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 19.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0513-10099)
- Medical Research Council (MR/K006584/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- preconception care, pregnancy planning, prenatal care, folic acid supplementation, smoking cessation, alcohol consumption, provider recommendation, health professional awareness, missed opportunities, maternal health behavior, pregnant women
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Occupations, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Perception, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Preconception Care, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
