The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG Source Connectivity Analysis: From Dense Array Recordings to Brain Networks
Open accessAbstract
The recent past years have seen a noticeable increase of interest for electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze functional connectivity through brain sources reconstructed from scalp signals. Although considerable advances have been done both on the recording and analysis of EEG signals, a number of methodological questions are still open regarding the optimal way to process the data in order to identify brain networks. In this paper, we analyze the impact of three factors that intervene in this processing: i) the number of scalp electrodes, ii) the combination between the algorithm used to solve the EEG inverse problem and the algorithm used to measure the functional connectivity and iii) the frequency bands retained to estimate the functional connectivity among neocortical sources. Using High-Resolution (hr) EEG recordings in healthy volunteers, we evaluated these factors on evoked responses during picture recognition and naming task. The main reason for selection this task is that a solid literature background is available about involved brain networks (ground truth). From this a priori information, we propose a performance criterion based on the number of connections identified in the regions of interest (ROI) that belong to potentially activated networks. Our results show that the three studied factors have a dramatic impact on the final result (the identified network in the source space) as strong discrepancies were evidenced depending on the methods used. They also suggest that the combination of weighted Minimum Norm Estimator (wMNE) and the Phase Synchronization (PS) methods applied on High-Resolution EEG in beta/gamma bands provides the best performance in term of topological distance between the identified network and the expected network in the above-mentioned cognitive task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain
Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2277 · Cited by 2,706
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0 · Cited by 1,553
Autism and Abnormal Development of Brain Connectivity: Figure 1.
Belmonte, M. K., Allen, G., Beckel-Mitchener, A., Boulanger, L. M., Carper, R. A., & Webb, S. J. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3340-04.2004 · Cited by 1,217
Gamma rhythms and beta rhythms have different synchronization properties
Kopell, N., Ermentrout, G. B., Whittington, M. A., & Traub, R. D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.4.1867 · Cited by 1,072 · cited 1×
“These results are in line with several studies suggesting that beta oscillations are related to longrange synchronization while gamma oscillations are more related to short range synchronization [75–77].”
ResultEpileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?
Lantz, G., Grave de Peralta, R., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., & Michel, C. M. (2003) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00337-1 · Cited by 413
Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Babiloni, C., Carducci, F., Mattia, D., Astolfi, L., Basilisco, A., Rossini, P. M., Ding, L., Ni, Y., et al. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.036 · Cited by 412
McDermott, K. B., Petersen, S. E., Watson, J. M., & Ojemann, J. G. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00162-8 · Cited by 393
Abrahams, S., Goldstein, L. H., Simmons, A., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., Giampietro, V. P., Andrew, C. M., & Leigh, P. N. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10126 · Cited by 258
How do brain tumors alter functional connectivity? A magnetoencephalography study
Bartolomei, F., Bosma, I., Klein, M., Baayen, J. C., Reijneveld, J. C., Postma, T. J., Heimans, J. J., van Dijk, B. W., de Munck, J. C., de Jongh, A., et al. (2006) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.20710 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassan, M., Dufor, O., Merlet, I., Berrou, C., & Wendling, F.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-08-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e105041
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011044564
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG Source Connectivity Analysis: From Dense Array Recordings to Brain Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0105041
- The paper
- Hassan, M., Dufor, O., Merlet, I., Berrou, C., & Wendling, F. (2014). EEG Source Connectivity Analysis: From Dense Array Recordings to Brain Networks. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.