The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Contents and Stocks in Denmark
Open accessAbstract
Estimation of carbon contents and stocks are important for carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and national carbon balance inventories. For Denmark, we modeled the vertical distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) and bulk density, and mapped its spatial distribution at five standard soil depth intervals (0-5, 5-15, 15-30, 30-60 and 60-100 cm) using 18 environmental variables as predictors. SOC distribution was influenced by precipitation, land use, soil type, wetland, elevation, wetness index, and multi-resolution index of valley bottom flatness. The highest average SOC content of 20 g kg(-1) was reported for 0-5 cm soil, whereas there was on average 2.2 g SOC kg(-1) at 60-100 cm depth. For SOC and bulk density prediction precision decreased with soil depth, and a standard error of 2.8 g kg(-1) was found at 60-100 cm soil depth. Average SOC stock for 0-30 cm was 72 t ha(-1) and in the top 1 m there was 120 t SOC ha(-1). In total, the soils stored approximately 570 Tg C within the top 1 m. The soils under agriculture had the highest amount of carbon (444 Tg) followed by forest and semi-natural vegetation that contributed 11% of the total SOC stock. More than 60% of the total SOC stock was present in Podzols and Luvisols. Compared to previous estimates, our approach is more reliable as we adopted a robust quantification technique and mapped the spatial distribution of SOC stock and prediction uncertainty. The estimation was validated using common statistical indices and the data and high-resolution maps could be used for future soil carbon assessment and inventories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world
BATJES, N. H. (1996) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x · Cited by 3,213
Cited by
Rudiyanto, Minasny, B., Setiawan, B. I., Saptomo, S. K., & McBratney, A. B. (2018) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.018 · Cited by 143
Self-citationParajuli, R., Knudsen, M. T., Djomo, S. N., Corona, A., Birkved, M., & Dalgaard, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.207 · Cited by 62
Pedotransfer functions for Irish soils – estimation of bulk density ( ρ b ) per horizon type
Reidy, B., Simo, I., Sills, P., & Creamer, R. E. (2016) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-2-25-2016 · Cited by 43
Cassart, P., Frei, A., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Kruse Rasmussen, H., Swartebroeckx, A., Froidmont, E., Stilmant, D., & Rossing, W. (2025) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-15770-300210 · Cited by 4
Xie, L., Duan, X., Norouzi, S., de Jonge, L. W., & Topping, C. J. (2026) · Agricultural and Environmental Modelling · doi:10.3897/aem.8.184962
Metadata
- Authors
- Adhikari, K., Hartemink, A. E., Minasny, B., Bou Kheir, R., Greve, M. B., & Greve, M. H.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-08-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e105519
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019894796
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Contents and Stocks in Denmark. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0105519
- The paper
- Adhikari, K., Hartemink, A. E., Minasny, B., Bou Kheir, R., Greve, M. B., & Greve, M. H. (2014). Digital Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Contents and Stocks in Denmark. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.