The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Ecosystem Services Knowledge and Values Influence Farmers' Decision-Making
Open accessAbstract
The ecosystem services (ES) concept has emerged and spread widely recently, to enhance the importance of preserving ecosystems through global change in order to maintain their benefits for human well-being. Numerous studies consider various dimensions of the interactions between ecosystems and land use via ES, but integrated research addressing the complete feedback loop between biodiversity, ES and land use has remained mostly theoretical. Few studies consider feedbacks from ecosystems to land use systems through ES, exploring how ES are taken into account in land management decisions. To fill this gap, we carried out a role-playing game to explore how ES cognition mediates feedbacks from environmental change on farmers' behaviors in a mountain grassland system. On a close to real landscape game board, farmers were faced with changes in ES under climatic and socio-economic scenarios and prompted to plan for the future and to take land management decisions as they deemed necessary. The outcomes of role-playing game were complemented with additional agronomic and ecological data from interviews and fieldwork. The effects of changes in ES on decision were mainly direct, i.e. not affecting knowledge and values, when they constituted situations with which farmers were accustomed. For example, a reduction of forage quantity following droughts led farmers to shift from mowing to grazing. Sometimes, ES cognitions were affected by ES changes or by external factors, leading to an indirect feedback. This happened when fertilization was stopped after farmers learned that it was inefficient in a drought context. Farmers' behaviors did not always reflect their attitudes towards ES because other factors including topographic constraints, social value of farming or farmer individual and household characteristics also influenced land-management decisions. Those results demonstrated the interest to take into account the complete feedback loop between ES and land management decisions to favor more sustainable ES management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The tool o ers a framework that disentangles the complex feedback loops of how management a ects ecological processes and ES flows, and how, in turn, these ES changes are perceived [27].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It was specifically mentioned that answers were expected to be the perspective of 'professionals working on ES', in order to distinguish ES expert perceptions from personal perceptions, as the same individual can endorse several roles [27].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It was specifically mentioned that answers were expected to be the perspective of 'professionals working on ES', in order to distinguish ES expert perceptions from personal perceptions, as the same individual can endorse several roles [27].”
From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,390
Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation
GEIST, H. J., & LAMBIN, E. F. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:pcaudf]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 3,123
The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being
Haines-Young, R. H., & Potschin, M. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007 · Cited by 1,681
Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments
Díaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quétier, F., Grigulis, K., & Robson, T. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104 · Cited by 1,658
Self-citationSpatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Hein, L., van Koppen, C. S. A., de Groot, R. S., & Ierland, E. C. V. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,360
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Rios, I. D. I., Rivera, M., Chebach, T., & Ashkenazy, A. (2018) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020 · Cited by 749
Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review
Deguine, J., Aubertot, J., Flor, R. J., Lescourret, F., Wyckhuys, K. A. G., & Ratnadass, A. (2021) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w · Cited by 853
Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions
Zhao, Y., Liu, Z., & Wu, J. (2020) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-020-00980-3 · Cited by 433
Cortner, O., Garrett, R. D., Valentim, J. F., Ferreira, J., Niles, M. T., Reis, J., & Gil, J. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.006 · Cited by 173
Williams, P. A., Sikutshwa, L., & Shackleton, S. E. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9090331 · Cited by 163
Bartkowski, B., & Bartke, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10093179 · Cited by 158
Rillig, M. C., Sosa‐Hernández, M. A., Roy, J., Aguilar‐Trigueros, C. A., Vályi, K., & Lehmann, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01625 · Cited by 140
Bernués, A., Tello-García, E., Rodríguez-Ortega, T., Ripoll-Bosch, R., & Casasús, I. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.033 · Cited by 126
Mustering the power of ecosystems for adaptation to climate change
Lavorel, S., Colloff, M. J., Locatelli, B., Gorddard, R., Prober, S. M., Gabillet, M., Devaux, C., Laforgue, D., & Peyrache-Gadeau, V. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.010 · Cited by 121
Self-citationPollinators, pests, and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems
Saunders, M. E., Peisley, R. K., Rader, R., & Luck, G. (2015) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0696-y · Cited by 104
Farmers show complex and contrasting perceptions on ecosystem services and their management
Teixeira, H. M., Vermue, A. J., Cardoso, I. M., Peña‐Claros, M., & Bianchi, F. J. J. A. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.006 · Cited by 95
Balkanlou, K. R., Müller, B. H., Cord, A. F., Panahi, F., Malekian, A., Jafari, M., & Egli, L. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137100 · Cited by 92
Christie, M., Martín-López, B., Church, A., Siwicka, E., Szymonczyk, P., & Sauterel, J. M. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6 · Cited by 76
Schermer, M., Ika Darnhofer, A., Daugstad, K., Gabillet, M., Lavorel, S., & Steinbacher, M. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.009 · Cited by 84
Self-citationEcological illiteracy can deepen farmers’ pesticide dependency
Wyckhuys, K. A. G., Heong, K. L., Sánchez‐Bayo, F., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Lundgren, J. G., & Bentley, J. W. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab34c9 · Cited by 90
Delaroche, M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.004 · Cited by 79
Actionable knowledge for land use planning: Making ecosystem services operational
Brunet, L., Tuomisaari, J., Lavorel, S., Crouzat, É., Bierry, A., Peltola, T., & Arpin, I. (2017) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.036 · Cited by 77
Self-citationMoutouama, F. T., Biaou, S. S. H., Kyereh, B., Asante, W. A., & Natta, A. K. (2019) · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine · doi:10.1186/s13002-019-0317-0 · Cited by 75
Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2019) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101029 · Cited by 64
Managing soil functions for a sustainable bioeconomy—Assessment framework and state of the art
Helming, K., Daedlow, K., Carsten, P., Techen, A., Bartke, S., Bartkowski, B., Kaiser, D., Wollschläger, U., & Vogel, H. J. (2018) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3066 · Cited by 62
Moreau, C., Barnaud, C., & Mathevet, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11020310 · Cited by 60
Ornetsmüller, C., Castella, J., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10104-230235 · Cited by 59
Trends and approaches in the analysis of ecosystem services provided by grazing systems: A review
D’Ottavio, P., Francioni, M., Trozzo, L., Sedić, E., Budimir, K., Avanzolini, P., Trombetta, M. F., Porqueddu, C., Santilocchi, R., & Toderi, M. (2017) · Grass and Forage Science · doi:10.1111/gfs.12299 · Cited by 58
Castillo-Eguskitza, N., Martín‐López, B., & Onaindia, M. (2018) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.004 · Cited by 57
Gębska, M., Grontkowska, A., Świderek, W. P., & Gołębiewska, B. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12198022 · Cited by 55
Beudou, J., Martin, G., & Ryschawy, J. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0436-8 · Cited by 63
A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice
Pătru-Stupariu, I., Hossu, C.-A., Grădinaru, S. R., Niță, A., Stupariu, M., Huzui-Stoiculescu, A., & Gavrilidis, A. A. (2020) · Land · doi:10.3390/land9090336 · Cited by 53
Harrison, P. A., Harmáčková, Z. V., Karabulut, A. A., Brotons, L., Cantele, M., Claudet, J., Dunford, R. W., Guisan, A., Holman, I. P., Jacobs, S., et al. (2019) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-10818-240227 · Cited by 50
Authelet, M., Subervie, J., Meyfroidt, P., Asquith, N., & Blas, D. E. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105487 · Cited by 57
Self-citationWoody encroachment and soil carbon stocks in subalpine areas in the Central Spanish Pyrenees
Nadal‐Romero, E., Otal-Laín, I., Martínez, T. L., Sánchez‐Navarrete, P., Abad, M. P. E., & Cammeraat, E. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.324 · Cited by 45
Crouzat, É., Martín‐López, B., Turkelboom, F., & Lavorel, S. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08494-210232 · Cited by 39
Self-citationIntegrating Spatially Explicit Representations of Landscape Perceptions into Land Change Research
Dorning, M. A., Berkel, D. V., & Semmens, D. J. (2017) · Current Landscape Ecology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40823-017-0025-1 · Cited by 39
Flow of mangrove ecosystem services to coastal communities in the Brazilian Amazon
Owuor, M. A., dos Santos, T. M. T., Otieno, P., Mazzuco, A. C. D. A., Iheaturu, C., & Bernardino, A. F. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1329006 · Cited by 38
Inkoom, J. N., Frank, S., Greve, K., & Fürst, C. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.027 · Cited by 38
Bruley, E., Locatelli, B., Vendel, F., Bergeret, A., Elleaume, N., Grosinger, J., & Lavorel, S. (2021) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-021-01760-8 · Cited by 37
Self-citationWinegrowers’ decision-making: A pan-European perspective on pesticide use and inter-row management
Chen, Y., Herrera, R. A., Benítez, E., Hoffmann, C., Möth, S., Paredes, D., Plaas, E., Popescu, D., Rascher, S., Rusch, A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.05.021 · Cited by 37
Applying ecological knowledge to the innovative design of sustainable agroecosystems
Berthet, E. T. A., Bretagnolle, V., Lavorel, S., Sabatier, R., Tichit, M., & Segrestin, B. (2018) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13173 · Cited by 36
Self-citationEuropean farmers’ incentives to promote natural pest control service in arable fields
Zhang, H., Potts, S. G., Breeze, T. D., & Bailey, A. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.017 · Cited by 31
Chen, J.-L., Lin, Y.-S., & Chuang, C. (2017) · Journal of Coastal Conservation · doi:10.1007/s11852-017-0586-5 · Cited by 28
Gissi, E., & Garramone, V. (2018) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.025 · Cited by 27
Chen, Z., Sarkar, A., Hasan, A. K., Li, X., & Xia, X. (2021) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture11111056 · Cited by 26
Durán, M., Canals, R. M., Sáez, J. L., Ferrer, V., & Lera‐López, F. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101200 · Cited by 25
Rito, M. V. D., Auer, A. D., Arnaiz‐Schmitz, C., Maceira, N., & Lorena, H. (2020) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.03.002 · Cited by 24
Facing the gap: exploring research on local knowledge of insect-provided services in agroecosystems
Rawluk, A., & Saunders, M. E. (2019) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2019.1567244 · Cited by 27
Gartzia, M., Fillat, F., Pérez, F., & Alados, C. L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155193 · Cited by 23
Dernat, S., Rigolot, C., Vollet, D., Cayré, P., & Dumont, B. (2021) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2021.1873155 · Cited by 22
Dietze, V., Hagemann, N., Juerges, N., Bartke, S., & Fürst, C. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.003 · Cited by 22
Vanermen, I., Muys, B., Verheyen, K., Vanwindekens, F., Bouriaud, L., Kardol, P., & Vranken, L. (2020) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102264 · Cited by 19
Horcea‐Milcu, A., Zaman, S., Filyushkina, A., López-Rodríguez, M. D., Cebrián‐Piqueras, M. A., & Raymond, C. M. (2022) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2022.2108498 · Cited by 16
Argüelles, L., & March, H. (2023) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103046 · Cited by 19
Circularity and livestock diversity: Pathways to sustainability in intensive pig farming regions
Rodríguez, J. Á., Ryschawy, J., Grillot, M., & Martin, G. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103809 · Cited by 16
Hervé, M. E. T., Boudes, P., Cieslik, C., Montembault, D., Jung, V., Burel, F., Cluzeau, D., Winter, S., & Nicolaï, A. (2018) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170518000273 · Cited by 16
Ahononga, F. C., Gouwakinnou, G. N., Biaou, S. S. H., Biaou, S., & Sonounameto, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences · doi:10.4314/ijbcs.v14i5.18 · Cited by 15
Madau, F. A., Arru, B., Furesi, R., Sau, P., & Pulina, P. (2022) · Agricultural and Food Economics · doi:10.1186/s40100-022-00225-8 · Cited by 15
White, A., Faulkner, J. W., Conner, D., Méndez, V. E., & Niles, M. T. (2022) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.2489/jswc.2022.00041 · Cited by 14
Liu, Y., Zhou, S., Chen, Y., Cheng, H., Zhou, W., Yang, M., Shen, Y., Wan, L., Su, X., & Liu, G. (2021) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01979 · Cited by 14
Wine grape grower perceptions and attitudes about soil health
Gonzalez‐Maldonado, N., Nocco, M. A., Steenwerth, K. L., Crump, A., & Lazcano, C. (2024) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103373 · Cited by 12
Leroy, D., & García, S. B. (2021) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-021-00251-y · Cited by 12
Lalani, B., Gray, S., & Mitra-Ganguli, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2023.1145744 · Cited by 16
How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study
Boeraeve, F., Dufrêne, M., Dendoncker, N., Dupire, A., & Mahy, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12062480 · Cited by 11
“It was specifically mentioned that answers were expected to be the perspective of ‘professionals working on ES’, in order to distinguish ES expert perceptions from personal perceptions, as the same individual can endorse several roles [27].”
BackgroundChoruma, D. J., & Odume, O. N. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11236567 · Cited by 12
Ecosystems, livelihood assets and willingness to pay for wetland conservation in Bangladesh
Al-Amin, A. K. M. A., Alam, K., Shrestha, U. B., Prodhan, M. M. H., Hossain, M. A. R., Sattar, N., Hossain, M. J., & Akhter, T. (2021) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01398-w · Cited by 10
Tipping points and farmer decision-making in European permanent grassland (PG) agricultural systems
Tindale, S. J., Cao, Y., Jin, S., Green, O., Burd, M., Vicario‐Modroño, V., Alonso, N., Clingo, S., Gallardo‐Cobos, R., Sánchez‐Zamora, P., et al. (2024) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103364 · Cited by 9
Song, Y., Cui, H., Zong, Y., & Yin, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-73858-y · Cited by 9
Resque, A. G. L., Piketty, M.-G., Coudel, É., Messad, S., & Page, C. L. (2021) · Cahiers Agricultures · doi:10.1051/cagri/2021006 · Cited by 9
Vollet, D., Huguenin‐Elie, O., Martin, B., & Dumont, B. (2018) · INRAE Productions Animales · doi:10.20870/productions-animales.2017.30.4.2264 · Cited by 9
Agroecosystem services: From general assessment to policy implications
Bermeo, M. M. S., Rudolf, M., & Olschewski, R. (2024) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10605 · Cited by 10
Allart, L., Joly, F., Oostvogels, V. J., Mosnier, C., Gross, N., Ripoll‐Bosch, R., & Dumont, B. (2024) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170524000279 · Cited by 8
Untapped Potential: Do Stakeholders Value Forests for Providing Clean Drinking Water?
Huizenga, E., Huff, E. S., Dowtin, A. L., & Latimore, J. A. (2022) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/1752-1688.13002 · Cited by 8
Les bouquets de services, un concept clé pour raisonner l’avenir des territoires d’élevage
Dumont, B., Ryschawy, J., Duru, M., Benoît, M., Delaby, L., Dourmad, J.-Y., Méda, B., Vollet, D., & SABATIER, R. (2018) · INRAE Productions Animales · doi:10.20870/productions-animales.2017.30.4.2271 · Cited by 8
Weaving values, knowledge and context to care for human–nature relationships in protected areas
Cebrián‐Piqueras, M. A., van Riper, C. J., Andrade, R., Raymond, C. M., Goodson, D. J., Keller, R., & Plieninger, T. (2025) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.70083 · Cited by 8
Schümann, H., Knierim, A., Bellingrath‐Kimura, S. D., & Kernecker, M. L. (2022) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-12970-270138 · Cited by 7
Küchen, L., Schmitt, T. M., Riebl, R., Hänsel, M., Steinbauer, M. J., Fricke, U., Redlich, S., & Koellner, T. (2023) · Ecosystems and People · doi:10.1080/26395916.2023.2192813 · Cited by 7
Rissing, A., & Burchfield, E. (2023) · Regional Environmental Change · doi:10.1007/s10113-023-02162-8 · Cited by 8
Translating stakeholder narratives for participatory modeling in landscape ecology
Vukomanovic, J., Smart, L. S., Koch, J., Dale, V., Plassin, S., Byrd, K., Beier, C., Wilson, M., & Doyon, F. (2023) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-023-01724-9 · Cited by 6
Nguyen, T. L., Pham, H., May, A. Y. C., & Chin, T. L. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Games Technology · doi:10.1155/ijcg/2315333 · Cited by 6
Seegers, R., Winter, E., & Grote, U. (2023) · Bio-based and Applied Economics · doi:10.36253/bae-13479 · Cited by 6
Asubonteng, K. O., Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Baud, I., & Pfeffer, K. (2025) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-024-01999-6 · Cited by 5
Resque, A. G. L., Perrier, E., Coudel, É., Galvão, L., Fontes, J. V., Carneiro, R. D. V., Navegantes, L., & Page, C. L. (2021) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-021-00633-7 · Cited by 5
Petit, T., Sigwalt, A., Martel, G., & Couvreur, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141912309 · Cited by 5
Leng, X., Feng, X., Qiu, J., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Feng, Y., & Fu, B. (2025) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108228 · Cited by 6
Farmers’ Perception towards Forest Ecosystem Services and Human Well-being
Sultana, S., Haque, M. E., Afrad, M. S. I., Rahman, G. M., & Rahman, M. A. (2023) · European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences · doi:10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.3.691 · Cited by 4
No bats, no gain: educational intervention increases farmers perception of ecosystem services
Lima, F. P., & Bastos, R. P. (2021) · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability · doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1911510 · Cited by 4
Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services and social actors to promote agroecological transitions
Teixeira, H. M. (2020) · doi:10.18174/509697 · Cited by 4
Tabuti, J. R. S., Adoch, E. P., Mawa, C., & Whitney, C. (2022) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-022-00360-2 · Cited by 3
Sitoula, M. L., Neave, M., & Coffey, B. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2023.2210748 · Cited by 3
Francois, J. R., Nelson, K. S., Burchfield, E., & Rissing, A. (2025) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-025-10764-7 · Cited by 2
Promising Role of Fungal Symbiosis for Eco-friendly Green Technology for Environmental Health
Verma, A. K., Bhojiya, A. A., Upadhyay, S. K., Yadav, V., Singhal, K., & Abbas, K. (2023) · Sustainable plant nutrition in a changing world · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35147-1_13 · Cited by 2
Salas‐Zapata, W. A., Castaño, A. M. P., & Mejía-Durango, D. (2021) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-021-09820-4 · Cited by 2
Evaluation, quantification, and mapping of ecosystem services in canola agroecosystems
Kaleji, M. K., Kazemi, H., Kamkar, B., Amirnejad, H., & Hosseinalizadeh, M. (2023) · Landscape and Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11355-023-00552-y · Cited by 3
Tindale, S. J., Elliott, J. E., Elings, M., Gallardo‐Cobos, R., Hunter, E., Lieberherr, E., Miškolci, S., Newell‐Price, P., Quatrini, S., Sánchez‐Zamora, P., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.12.148585 · Cited by 2
Bakar, M. A. A., Rahim, A. A., & Nasir, M. I. M. (2022) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i9/14492 · Cited by 1
Moscatelli, S., Paniccià, A., Palmioli, E., Gobbo, L. D., Mercati, F., & Scocco, P. (2025) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani15020201 · Cited by 1
Nielsen, M. R., Mulder, M. B., Skjærvø, G. R., Klöckner, C. A., Moe, E., Meilby, H., Hartsteen, H. P., & GRAAE, B. J. (2025) · Frontiers in Conservation Science · doi:10.3389/fcosc.2025.1604967 · Cited by 1
Agroecology: A pathway to sustainable agriculture and food system resilience
Menia, M., Singh, R., Singh, S. B., Priyanka, & Rattan, P. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-38325-0.00001-0 · Cited by 1
Khan, F., Abbass, K., & Qun, W. (2026) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.71231 · Cited by 1
Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Primary Sector in Floodplains: A Study of Sardinia
Arru, B., Furesi, R., Pulina, P., Bardi, A., & Madau, F. A. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17030857 · Cited by 1
Targetti, S., Hinojosa, L., Mouléry, M., & Napoléone, C. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3093232/v1 · Cited by 1
Multiple aspects of wealth creation in a social-ecological system of the French Alps
Grosinger, J. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/7b90dea6zc5f1z40d8z905aza3a6450f55fb · Cited by 2
Schurr, H. (2017) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamarque, P., Meyfroidt, P., Nettier, B., & Lavorel, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Fund for Scientific Research (BE)
- Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lamarque, Pénélope
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e107572
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4182349
- OpenAlex
- W2036393554
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Cemadoc (Cemagref / IRSTEA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biodiversa+
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- ecosystem services, farmer decision-making, ecosystem service value, land management, montane grassland, role-playing games, drought, grazing, mowing, fertilization, topographic constraints, sustainable land management, biodiversity
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Decision Making, France, Games, Experimental, Humans, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
