Cited by 50Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryCharacterization and Applications of Magnetic NanoparticlesNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics

Tumor Cell Targeting by Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Is Dominated by Different Factors In Vitro versus In Vivo

Open access
NDong, Christian, Tate, Jennifer A., Kett, Warren C., Batra, Jaya, Demidenko, Eugene, Lewis, Lionel D., Hoopes, P. Jack, Gerngross, Tillman U. +1 more·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Realizing the full potential of iron oxide nanoparticles (IONP) for cancer diagnosis and therapy requires selective tumor cell accumulation. Here, we report a systematic analysis of two key determinants for IONP homing to human breast cancers: (i) particle size and (ii) active vs passive targeting. In vitro, molecular targeting to the HER2 receptor was the dominant factor driving cancer cell association. In contrast, size was found to be the key determinant of tumor accumulation in vivo, where molecular targeting increased tumor tissue concentrations for 30 nm but not 100 nm IONP. Similar to the in vitro results, PEGylation did not influence in vivo IONP biodistribution. Thus, the results reported here indicate that the in vitro advantages of molecular targeting may not consistently extend to pre-clinical in vivo settings. These observations may have important implications for the design and clinical translation of advanced, multifunctional, IONP platforms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0115636

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal models can imitate the TME to provide essential information regarding tumor growth and tumor response to drug compounds in vivo for the study of pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action after drug treatment.

    “Alternatively, animal models, as the gold standard in cancer biology, can imitate the TME to provide essential information regarding tumor growth and tumor response to drug compounds in vivo for the study of the pharmacokinetics and mechanism of action after drug treatment26–30.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Varanda LC, Imaizumi M, Santos F, Jafelicci M (2008) Iron Oxide Versus Fe55Pt45/Fe3O4: Improved Magnetic Properties of Core/Shell Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 44: 4448– 4451.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NDong, C., Tate, J. A., Kett, W. C., Batra, J., Demidenko, E., Lewis, L. D., Hoopes, P. J., Gerngross, T. U., & Griswold, K. E.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Griswold, Karl E.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-02-19
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e0115636
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077045805
Cited by
50
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Dartmouth College
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA151662, P30CA023108)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Keywords
iron oxide nanoparticles, tumor cell targeting, breast cancer, HER2 receptor, nanoparticle size, PEGylation, tissue distribution, tumor accumulation, in vivo and in vitro comparison, MRI contrast agents
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Ferric Compounds, Humans, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review