The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Selection for Wearable Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition with Able bodied, Elderly, and Stroke Patients
Open accessAbstract
Human activity recognition (HAR), using wearable sensors, is a growing area with the potential to provide valuable information on patient mobility to rehabilitation specialists. Smartphones with accelerometer and gyroscope sensors are a convenient, minimally invasive, and low cost approach for mobility monitoring. HAR systems typically pre-process raw signals, segment the signals, and then extract features to be used in a classifier. Feature selection is a crucial step in the process to reduce potentially large data dimensionality and provide viable parameters to enable activity classification. Most HAR systems are customized to an individual research group, including a unique data set, classes, algorithms, and signal features. These data sets are obtained predominantly from able-bodied participants. In this paper, smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope sensor data were collected from populations that can benefit from human activity recognition: able-bodied, elderly, and stroke patients. Data from a consecutive sequence of 41 mobility tasks (18 different tasks) were collected for a total of 44 participants. Seventy-six signal features were calculated and subsets of these features were selected using three filter-based, classifier-independent, feature selection methods (Relief-F, Correlation-based Feature Selection, Fast Correlation Based Filter). The feature subsets were then evaluated using three generic classifiers (Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, j48 Decision Tree). Common features were identified for all three populations, although the stroke population subset had some differences from both able-bodied and elderly sets. Evaluation with the three classifiers showed that the feature subsets produced similar or better accuracies than classification with the entire feature set. Therefore, since these feature subsets are classifier-independent, they should be useful for developing and improving HAR systems across and within populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Other studies [44,58] employed Relief-F that takes a filter-method approach to feature selection to keep only the most relevant features.”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feature selection for high-dimensional data: a fast correlation-based filter solution
Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2003) · Cited by 2,305
A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2032660 · Cited by 2,296
Activity recognition from accelerometer data
Ravi, N., Dandekar, N., Mysore, P., & Littman, M. L. (2005) · Cited by 1,422
Computational Methods of Feature Selection
(2007) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781584888796 · Cited by 1,282
Activity Recognition and Monitoring Using Multiple Sensors on Different Body Positions
Maurer, U., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D. P., & Deisher, M. E. (2006) · Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · doi:10.1109/bsn.2006.6 · Cited by 606
USC-HAD: a daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors
Zhang, M., & Sawchuk, A. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370438 · Cited by 554
Feature Selection for Machine Learning: Comparing a Correlation-Based Filter Approach to the Wrapper
Hall, M. A., & Smith, L. A. (1999) · Cited by 526
Avci, A., Bosch, S., Marin-Perianu, M., Marin-Perianu, R., & Havinga, P. (2010) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 443
Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
Dey, A. K., Chu, H.-H., & Hayes, G. R. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2370216 · Cited by 332
A Review and Taxonomy of Activity Recognition on Mobile Phones
İncel, Ö. D., Köse, M., & Ersoy, C. (2013) · BioNanoScience · doi:10.1007/s12668-013-0088-3 · Cited by 234
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–197 of 197
Overview of Human Activity Recognition Using Sensor Data
Hamad, R. A., Woo, W. L., Wei, B. W., & Yang, L. (2024) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55568-8_32 · Cited by 9
Multi-dimensional task recognition for human-robot teaming: literature review
Baskaran, P., & Adams, J. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1123374 · Cited by 9
Tasmin, M., Ishtiak, T., Ruman, S. U., Suhan, A. U. R. C., Islam, N. M. S., Jahan, S., Ahmed, S., Zulminan, M. S., Saleheen, A. R., & Rahman, R. M. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/is48319.2020.9199934 · Cited by 8
Khayami, H., Wang, L., Kim, Y., Lee, B., Conroy, D. E., Lazar, A., Choe, E. K., & Kacorri, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3731749 · Cited by 7
Wu, J., & Liu, Q. (2023) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-023-11385-z · Cited by 7
A Hierarchical Approach towards Activity Recognition
Anderez, D. O., Appiah, K., Lotfi, A., & Langesiepen, C. (2017) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3056540.3076194 · Cited by 7
Model-Based Design of Energy-Efficient Human Activity Recognition Systems with Wearable Sensors
Grützmacher, F., Hein, A., Kirste, T., & Haubelt, C. D. (2018) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies6040089 · Cited by 7
Bai, C., Wanigatunga, A. A., Saldana, S. J., Casanova, R., Manini, T. M., & Mardini, M. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22083061 · Cited by 7
Daniel, C. R., Yazbek, P., dos Santos, A. C. A., & Battistella, L. R. (2022) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/10749357.2022.2058292 · Cited by 7
Smart Cup to Monitor Stroke Patients Activities During Everyday Life
Bobin, M., Amroun, H., Boukalle, M., Anastassova, M., & Ammi, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) · doi:10.1109/cybermatics_2018.2018.00062 · Cited by 9
Ojelade, A., Rajabi, M. S., Kim, S., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2025) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2025.103755 · Cited by 12
Restrepo, J. K. G., Patricia, A.-C. P., Agustín, O.-B. A., Brieva, E. D. C. S., Urina‐Triana, M., Emiro, D.-L.-H.-F., Luis, D.-M. J., Aziz, B. S., & Diego, M. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.069 · Cited by 6
Adaptable Action-Aware Vital Models for Personalized Intelligent Patient Monitoring
Wu, K., Chen, E. H., Xing, H., Wirth, F., Vitanova, K., Lange, R., & Burschka, D. (2022) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812176 · Cited by 6
Razfar, N., Kashef, R. F., & Mohammadi, F. A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc-dss-smartcity-dependsys53884.2021.00205 · Cited by 7
Razfar, N., Kashef, R. F., & Mohammadi, F. A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc-dss-smartcity-dependsys53884.2021.00221 · Cited by 6
Dorado, M. C. N., Salazar, M., & Aranda, J. (2022) · International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics · doi:10.1109/icorr55369.2022.9896504 · Cited by 6
Leveraging a Smartwatch for Activity Recognition in Salat
Eliza, I. J., Al-Nabhan, N., Noor, J., Rahaman, M., & Islam, A. B. M. A. A. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3311261 · Cited by 7
Emeterio, C. S., Menéndez, H., Guillén-Rogel, P., & Marin, P. J. (2021) · Footwear Science · doi:10.1080/19424280.2021.1995052 · Cited by 6
Çelik, Y., Stuart, S., Woo, W. L., Pearson, L. T., & Godfrey, A. (2022) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc48229.2022.9870909 · Cited by 5
Method for Undefined Complex Human Activity Recognition
Abramova, E. S., Makarov, K. V., & Orlov, A. (2021) · International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM) · doi:10.1109/icieam51226.2021.9446389 · Cited by 5
García-Domínguez, A., Galvan-Tejada, C. E., Zanella-Calzada, L. A., Gamboa-Rosales, H., Galván-Tejada, J. I., Padilla, J. M. C., Luna-García, H., Arceo-Olague, J. G., & Magallanes‐Quintanar, R. (2020) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.308 · Cited by 6
Rat robot motion state identification based on a wearable inertial sensor
Chen, Y., Xu, H., Yang, W., Yang, C., & Xu, K. (2021) · Metrology and Measurement Systems · doi:10.24425/mms.2021.136605 · Cited by 7
Elderly activity recognition using smartphones and wearable devices
Zimmermann, L. C. (2019) · doi:10.11606/d.55.2019.tde-10062019-080049 · Cited by 5
MFCC Delta–Delta Energy Feature Extraction for Clustering of Road Surface Types
Jawale, A., & Magar, G. (2022) · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s42947-022-00153-2 · Cited by 4
Improving Human Activity Recognition Algorithms using Wireless Body Sensors and SVM
Shaafi, A., Salem, O., & Mehaoua, A. (2020) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc48107.2020.9148175 · Cited by 4
A customized 1D-CNN approach for sensor-based human activity recognition
(2022) · International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Exploration · doi:10.19101/ijatee.2021.874828 · Cited by 5
Activity recognition on smartphones using an AKNN based support vectors
Abidine, M. B., Oussalah, M., Fergani, B., & Lounis, H. (2022) · Sensor Review · doi:10.1108/sr-05-2021-0157 · Cited by 4
Face Blindness in Children and Current Interventions
Ma, W., Xiao, Z., Wu, Y., Zhang, X., Zheng, D., Lei, X., & Han, C. (2023) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs13080676 · Cited by 4
Feature selection of Human Daily Activities using Ensemble method Classification
Nurhanim, K., Elamvazuthi, I., Izhar, L. I., & Capi, G. (2019) · IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD) · doi:10.1109/scored.2019.8896253 · Cited by 4
Filjar, R., Sklebar, I., & Horvat, M. (2020) · Communications - Scientific letters of the University of Zilina · doi:10.26552/com.c.2020.4.153-162 · Cited by 4
Track My Health: An IoT Approach for Data Acquisition and Activity Recognition
Botilias, G., Papoutsis, A., Karvelis, P. S., & Stylios, C. D. (2020) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti200654 · Cited by 4
Study of Feature Extraction Techniques for Sensor Data Classification
Jawale, A., & Magar, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development · doi:10.4018/ijicthd.2021010103 · Cited by 4
Peker, M., Ballı, S., & Sağbaş, E. A. (2020) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2460-2.ch017 · Cited by 4
Features Selection for Human Activity Recognition in Telerehabilitation
Orlov, A., Makarov, K. V., & Tarantova, E. S. (2019) · 2019 International Science and Technology Conference "EastConf" · doi:10.1109/eastconf.2019.8725408 · Cited by 4
Classification of Smartphone Users Using Internet TrafficPreprint
Finkelstein, A., Bitton, R., Puzis, R., & Shabtai, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.00220 · Cited by 4
Filippou, V., Backhouse, M. R., Redmond, A. C., & Wong, D. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23229061 · Cited by 3
Filippou, V., Redmond, A. C., Bennion, J., Backhouse, M. R., & Wong, D. (2020) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176201 · Cited by 3
Recognition of Human Activities via Wearable Sensors
de Nardin, L., Rodrigues, K. R. D. H., Zimmermann, L. C., Orlandi, B. D. M., & Pimentel, M. D. G. C. (2020) · Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web · doi:10.1145/3428658.3431086 · Cited by 3
Optimal Feature Set for Smartphone-based Activity Recognition
Dehkordi, M. B., Zaraki, A., & Setchi, R. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.123 · Cited by 3
García-Restrepo, J.-K., Ariza-Colpas, P., Butt, S. A., Piñeres-Melo, M. A., Naz, S., & De-La-Hoz-Franco, E. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42823-4_19 · Cited by 3
Human Activity Prediction Studies Using Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning
Sharma, D., & Chauhan, U. (2024) · Journal of Computer Science · doi:10.3844/jcssp.2024.431.441 · Cited by 3
Schober, S., Schimbäck, E., Pendl, K., Pichler, K., Sturm, V., & Runte, F. (2024) · Journal of sensors and sensor systems · doi:10.5194/jsss-13-187-2024 · Cited by 3
Peker, M., Ballı, S., & Sağbaş, E. A. (2018) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-4766-2.ch017 · Cited by 3
Multivariate Hidden Markov Models for Personal Smartphone Sensor Data: Time Series Analysis
van der Kamp, W. S., & Osgood, N. D. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) · doi:10.1109/ichi.2017.84 · Cited by 3
Wang, Y., Khayami, H., Lee, B., Lazar, A., Kacorri, H., & Choe, E. K. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies · doi:10.1145/3770649 · Cited by 2
Real-Time Motion Up and Down Activity Recognition Based on Smart Phone and Smart Watch Sensors
Afram, R. M., Abd-almuhsen, G. S., Ali, Y. H., Falih, B. S., Ahmed, W. R., Ali, H. A., Jasim, A. A., Josephine, R., Muslim, A. M., & Ali, E. M. (2022) · International Conference on Current Research in Engineering and Science Applications (ICCRESA) · doi:10.1109/iccresa57091.2022.10352458 · Cited by 2
A Comparative Analysis of Feature Selection Approaches for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition
Sen, P., Saha, A., Kumari, S., & Chowdhury, C. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2611-0_11 · Cited by 2
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V. A., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09282-4_10 · Cited by 2
Micro Activity Recognition of Mobile Phone Users Using Inbuilt Sensors
Bansal, A., Shukla, A., Rastogi, S., & Mittal, S. (2018) · International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence) · doi:10.1109/confluence.2018.8442663 · Cited by 2
A Study on Linear Acceleration of the Wrist During Free-Living
Sharma, S. P., & Hoover, A. W. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm47256.2019.8983383 · Cited by 2
Kalyani, P., Manasa, Y., Altahan, B. R., Ahammad, S. H., Suman, M., Hossain, M. A., & Rashed, A. N. Z. (2023) · Signal Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1007/s11760-023-02521-2 · Cited by 2
RetractedRelative Efficacy of Sensor Modalities for Estimating Post-Stroke Motor Impairment
Nelson, Z. E., & Wade, E. (2018) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2018.8512818 · Cited by 2
Domain models for data sources integration in HAR
Hamidi, M., & Osmani, A. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.06.138 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of Wearable Sensors as an Older Adult Fall Risk Assessment Tool
Howcroft, J. (2016) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 3
Activity Recognition for Stroke Patients
Vågeskar, E. (2017) · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · Cited by 2
Recognition and Classification of Aggressive Motion Using Smartwatches
Franck, T. (2018) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-22336 · Cited by 2
Ojelade, A., Rajabi, M. S., Kim, S., & Nussbaum, M. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4779046 · Cited by 2
Identifying Users based on their Activity Pattern using Machine Learning
Shin, J., Hasan, M. A. M., & Maniruzzaman, M. (2023) · International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Control Engineering (ICECC) · doi:10.1145/3592307.3592312 · Cited by 1
Teleassessment Methods in Orthopedic Rehabilitation
Elibol, N., & Bakırhan, S. (2024) · TELe-Health · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69080-8_1 · Cited by 1
Lim, H., Park, T., & Kim, N. S. (2015) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el.2015.0013 · Cited by 1
Optimization of Hyperparameters in Convolutional Neural Network for Human Activity Recognition
Thakur, D., & Biswas, S. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-6407-6_47 · Cited by 1
Lineamientos para el diseño de aplicaciones de ingreso de texto para adultos mayores
Guerrero-Ulloa, G., & Cabrera, K. (2021) · Revista InGenio · doi:10.18779/ingenio.v4i2.411 · Cited by 1
Hidden Markov Models: Discrete Feature Selection in Activity Recognition
Ali, S., & Bouguila, N. (2012) · Unsupervised and semi-supervised learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99142-5_5 · Cited by 1
Chen, X., Jiang, X. F., Guo, S., Lin, J., Liao, M., Fan, H., Zhang, Y., & Luo, G. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-17726-3 · Cited by 1
Natively Neuromorphic LMU Architecture for Encoding-Free SNN-Based HAR on Commercial Edge Devices
Fra, V., Leto, B., Pignata, A., Macii, E., & Urgese, G. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72359-9_28 · Cited by 1
Human Activity Recognition and Control of Wearable Robots
Chinimilli, P. T. (2018) · Cited by 1
A Multi-Featured Analysis for Body Sensor Networks-based Affective Actions Recognition
Wang, Z., Yang, N., Zhao, H., Shi, X., Qiu, S., & Wang, Z. (2019) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2019.8791920 · Cited by 1
Feature Reorganization Based Human Activity Recognition in IoT-Enabled Applications
Zhou, M., Tao, M., & Chen, P. (2019) · IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing with Applications (ISPA) · doi:10.1109/ispa-bdcloud-sustaincom-socialcom48970.2019.00026 · Cited by 1
Capela, N. A. (2015) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-4167 · Cited by 1
Multi-sensor activity recognition using 2DPCA and K-means clustering based on dual-measure distance
He, H. S., Huang, J., & Zhang, W. (2017) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2017.8172403
Pragmatic classification of movement primitives for stroke rehabilitationPreprint
Parnandi, A., Uddin, J., Nilsen, D. M., & Schambra, H. M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.08697 · Cited by 2
Santana, F. V. V., Rasteiro, B. H., Zimmermann, L. C., de Nardin, L., & Pimentel, M. D. G. C. (2019) · Anais Estendidos do Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Multimídia e Web (WebMedia) · doi:10.5753/webmedia_estendido.2019.8140
Survey on Approaches and Practical Areas of Human Activity Recognition Application
Тарантова, Е. С., Макаров, К. В., & Орлов, А. А. (2019) · Bulletin of the South Ural State University Series Computational Mathematics and Software Engineering · doi:10.14529/cmse190303
Improving state estimation through projection post-processing for activity recognition in football.Preprint
Ciszewski, M. G., Söhl, J., & Jongbloed, G. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
A Novel Algorithm for Human Activity Determination Feature Selection and Classification
Myo, W. W. (2019) · PSU Knowledge Bank (Prince of Songkla University)
Human Activity Recognition Based on Convolutional Neural Network via Smart-phone Sensors
Chen, Z., Zhou, M. Q., Feng, L., & Li, B. (2022) · doi:10.1145/3556384.3556406
Ciszewski, M. G., Söhl, J., & Jongbloed, G. (2023) · Statistical Methods & Applications · doi:10.1007/s10260-023-00696-z
Tahir, R., Khan, S. Q., & Ghani, A. (2024) · EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60140-8_8
Ensemble filter based feature selection technique for classification of human activity recognition
Yusup, N., & Zain, A. M. (2025) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0208886
Enhancing Human Activity Recognition with Ensemble of Hybrid Feature Selection Techniques
Basak, S., Chakraborty, P., Nandi, S., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2024) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Embedded Design (ISED) · doi:10.1109/ised63599.2024.10957654
Problemli Mobil Telefon Kullanımının Açıklamasında Yalnızlık ve Ertelemenin Rolü
Sarı, S. (2025) · Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.29299/kefad.1520390
Dias, T. S., Mendes, J. J. A., Lopes, H. S., Silva, T. H., & Pichorim, S. F. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108736
Astafiev, A. V., Karpycheva, L., & Erofeev, A. V. (2026) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14742-4_38
Choudhury, N. A., & Soni, B. (2026) · Transactions on computer systems and networks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7206-9_2
Data Intensity-Based Feature Selection Protocol for Sensor-Based HAR System
Choudhury, N. A., & Soni, B. (2026) · Transactions on computer systems and networks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-7206-9_4
Recent Advances in Human Activity Recognition for Healthcare (2019–2025)
Yu, H., Wang, Q., Cang, S., Zifeng, H., Wang, Y., & Linh, N. V. (2026) · International Symposium on Intelligent Robotics and Systems (ISoIRS) · doi:10.1109/isoirs70157.2026.11545278
Synthetic Data–Guided Feature Selection for Robust Activity Recognition in Older Adults
Que, S., van Dartel, D., Heeringa, I., Hegeman, H., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., & Wang, Y. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28819-6_9 · Cited by 1
CNN-GRU with Multi-Head Attention based Lightweight Model for Human Activity Recognition
Datta, P., Soni, B., & Kaushal, G. (2026) · IEEE Guwahati Subsection Conference (GCON) · doi:10.1109/gcon69192.2026.11648358
MUSIC-CAR: A Multi-Label Complex Health-Related Activity Recognition Dataset from Smartphone Sensors
Chandrasekaran, K., Buquicchio, L., Agu, E., & Rundensteiner, E. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Digital Health (ICDH) · doi:10.1109/icdh72779.2026.00039
Kholifah, N., Ahmed, S. E., Yılmaz, E., & Aydın, D. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15100698
Gorce, P., & Jacquier-Bret, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1933096
Metadata
- Authors
- Capela, N. A., Lemaire, E. D., & Baddour, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Capela, Nicole A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0124414
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4401457
- OpenAlex
- W2066338981
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, feature selection, accelerometer, gyroscope, stroke patients, older adults, mobility monitoring, rehabilitation, ReliefF, correlation-based feature selection, fast correlation-based filter
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Aged, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Monitoring, Physiologic, Safety, Case-Control Studies, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review