The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Selection for Wearable Smartphone-Based Human Activity Recognition with Able bodied, Elderly, and Stroke Patients
Open accessAbstract
Human activity recognition (HAR), using wearable sensors, is a growing area with the potential to provide valuable information on patient mobility to rehabilitation specialists. Smartphones with accelerometer and gyroscope sensors are a convenient, minimally invasive, and low cost approach for mobility monitoring. HAR systems typically pre-process raw signals, segment the signals, and then extract features to be used in a classifier. Feature selection is a crucial step in the process to reduce potentially large data dimensionality and provide viable parameters to enable activity classification. Most HAR systems are customized to an individual research group, including a unique data set, classes, algorithms, and signal features. These data sets are obtained predominantly from able-bodied participants. In this paper, smartphone accelerometer and gyroscope sensor data were collected from populations that can benefit from human activity recognition: able-bodied, elderly, and stroke patients. Data from a consecutive sequence of 41 mobility tasks (18 different tasks) were collected for a total of 44 participants. Seventy-six signal features were calculated and subsets of these features were selected using three filter-based, classifier-independent, feature selection methods (Relief-F, Correlation-based Feature Selection, Fast Correlation Based Filter). The feature subsets were then evaluated using three generic classifiers (Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, j48 Decision Tree). Common features were identified for all three populations, although the stroke population subset had some differences from both able-bodied and elderly sets. Evaluation with the three classifiers showed that the feature subsets produced similar or better accuracies than classification with the entire feature set. Therefore, since these feature subsets are classifier-independent, they should be useful for developing and improving HAR systems across and within populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Other studies [44,58] employed Relief-F that takes a filter-method approach to feature selection to keep only the most relevant features.”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feature selection for high-dimensional data: a fast correlation-based filter solution
Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2003) · Cited by 2,305
A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis
Pantelopoulos, A., & Bourbakis, N. G. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2009.2032660 · Cited by 2,296
Activity recognition from accelerometer data
Ravi, N., Dandekar, N., Mysore, P., & Littman, M. L. (2005) · Cited by 1,422
Computational Methods of Feature Selection
(2007) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781584888796 · Cited by 1,282
Activity Recognition and Monitoring Using Multiple Sensors on Different Body Positions
Maurer, U., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D. P., & Deisher, M. E. (2006) · Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks · doi:10.1109/bsn.2006.6 · Cited by 606
USC-HAD: a daily activity dataset for ubiquitous activity recognition using wearable sensors
Zhang, M., & Sawchuk, A. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing · doi:10.1145/2370216.2370438 · Cited by 554
Feature Selection for Machine Learning: Comparing a Correlation-Based Filter Approach to the Wrapper
Hall, M. A., & Smith, L. A. (1999) · Cited by 526
Avci, A., Bosch, S., Marin-Perianu, M., Marin-Perianu, R., & Havinga, P. (2010) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 443
Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
Dey, A. K., Chu, H.-H., & Hayes, G. R. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2370216 · Cited by 332
A Review and Taxonomy of Activity Recognition on Mobile Phones
İncel, Ö. D., Köse, M., & Ersoy, C. (2013) · BioNanoScience · doi:10.1007/s12668-013-0088-3 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nweke, H. F., Teh, Y. W., Al-garadi, M. A., & Alo, U. R. (2018) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.056 · Cited by 930
Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: State-of-the-art and research challenges
Gravina, R., Alinia, P., Ghasemzadeh, H., & Fortino, G. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.09.005 · Cited by 899
Sensor-based and vision-based human activity recognition: A comprehensive survey
Minh Dang, L., Min, K., Wang, H., Jalil Piran, M., Hee Lee, C., & Moon, H. (2020) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107561 · Cited by 730
A Survey on Activity Detection and Classification Using Wearable Sensors
Cornacchia, M., Ozcan, K., Zheng, Y., & Velipasalar, S. (2016) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2016.2628346 · Cited by 427
Nweke, H. F., Wah, T. Y., Mujtaba, G., & Al-Garadi, M. A. (2018) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.06.002 · Cited by 408
Demrozi, F., Pravadelli, G., Bihorac, A., & Rashidi, P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037715 · Cited by 368
A multi-sensor data fusion enabled ensemble approach for medical data from body sensor networks
Muzammal, M., Talat, R., Sodhro, A. H., & Pirbhulal, S. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.06.021 · Cited by 311
Maceira-Elvira, P., Popa, T., Schmid, A., & Hummel, F. C. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0612-y · Cited by 291
Tracking the Evolution of Smartphone Sensing for Monitoring Human Movement
Rosario, M. D., Redmond, S. J., & Lovell, N. H. (2015) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s150818901 · Cited by 216
Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197 · Cited by 180
Jalal, A., Khalid, N., & Kim, K. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22080817 · Cited by 164
Tedesco, S. A., Barton, J. J., & O’Flynn, B. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17061277 · Cited by 131
Machine Learning-Enabled Internet of Things (IoT): Data, Applications, and Industry Perspective
Bzai, J., Alam, F., Dhafer, A., Bojović, M., Altowaijri, S. M., Niazi, I. K., & Mehmood, R. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11172676 · Cited by 110
Rast, F. M., & Labruyère, R. (2020) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-020-00779-y · Cited by 95
Zhou, Z., Yu, H., & Shi, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2992584 · Cited by 106
Helmi, A. M., Al‐qaness, M. A. A., Dahou, A., Damaševičius, R., Krilavičius, T., & Elaziz, M. A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23081065 · Cited by 87
Human Activity Recognition in AAL Environments Using Random Projections
Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevas, M., Šalkevičius, J., & Woźniak, M. (2016) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2016/4073584 · Cited by 82
Lee, C.-H., & Sun, T. (2018) · Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY · doi:10.1186/s40101-018-0187-5 · Cited by 82
Smartphone-based systems for physical rehabilitation applications: A systematic review
Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Zhang, W., Cobo, M. J., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & KABER, D. B. (2019) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2019.1611676 · Cited by 88
O'Brien, M. K., Shawen, N., Mummidisetty, C. K., Kaur, S., Bo, X., Poellabauer, C., Kording, K., & Jayaraman, A. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7385 · Cited by 78
A review of vision-based indoor HAR: state-of-the-art, challenges, and future prospects
Bhola, G., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15443-5 · Cited by 78
Physical Activity Classification for Elderly People in Free-Living Conditions
Awais, M., Chiari, L., Ihlen, E. A. F., Helbostad, J. L., & Palmerini, L. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2820179 · Cited by 76
AI Applications in Adult Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Using AI
Senadheera, I., Hettiarachchi, P., Haslam, B. S., Nawaratne, R., Sheehan, J., Lockwood, K. J., Alahakoon, D., & Carey, L. M. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24206585 · Cited by 90
Smartphone User Identity Verification Using Gait Characteristics
Damaševičius, R., Maskeliūnas, R., Venčkauskas, A., & Woźniak, M. (2016) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym8100100 · Cited by 71
Feature selection for elderly faller classification based on wearable sensors
Howcroft, J., Kofman, J., & Lemaire, E. D. (2017) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0255-9 · Cited by 66
Activity recognition based on inertial sensors for Ambient Assisted Living
Davis, K., Owusu, E., Bastani, V., Marcenaro, L., Hu, J., Regazzoni, C. S., & Feijs, L. M. G. (2016) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 61
Thakur, D., & Biswas, S. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107681 · Cited by 57
Ponti, M. A., Bet, P., Oliveira, C. L., & Castro, P. C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175559 · Cited by 58
Szot, T., Specht, C., Specht, M., & Dąbrowski, P. S. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215562 · Cited by 55
Activity Recognition for Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Subjects Using Hidden Markov Models
Sok, P., Xiao, T., Azeze, Y., Jayaraman, A., & Albert, M. V. (2018) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2845749 · Cited by 54
Thakur, D., & Biswas, S. (2022) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103417 · Cited by 56
An overview of human activity recognition based on smartphone
Yuan, G., Wang, Z., Meng, F., Yan, Q., & Xia, S. (2018) · Sensor Review · doi:10.1108/sr-11-2017-0245 · Cited by 54
Remote Health Monitoring Systems for Elderly People: A Survey
Ahmed, S., Irfan, S., Kiran, N., Masood, N., Anjum, N., & Ramzan, N. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23167095 · Cited by 52
Enhanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors via a Hybrid Feature Selection Method
Fan, C., & Gao, F. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21196434 · Cited by 54
Jayaraman, P. P., Gomes, J. B., Nguyen, H.-L., Abdallah, Z. S., Krishnaswamy, S. P., & Zaslavsky, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2016.2519462 · Cited by 49
Home monitoring of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease patients
Borzì, L., Varrecchia, M., Olmo, G., Artusi, C. A., Fabbri, M., Rizzone, M. G., Romagnolo, A., Zibetti, M., & Lopiano, L. (2019) · Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments · doi:10.1007/s40860-019-00086-x · Cited by 48
Validation of Freezing-of-Gait Monitoring Using Smartphone
Kim, H. B., Lee, H. J., Lee, W. W., Kim, S. K., Jeon, H. S., Park, H. Y., Shin, C., Yi, W. J., Jeon, B., & Park, K. S. (2018) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0215 · Cited by 47
Gait phase detection from thigh kinematics using machine learning techniques
Farah, J. D., Baddour, N., & Lemaire, E. D. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) · doi:10.1109/memea.2017.7985886 · Cited by 46
Multi-Sensor Data Fusion and CNN-LSTM Model for Human Activity Recognition System
Zhou, H., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Lu, S., An, X., & Liu, Q. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23104750 · Cited by 49
A wavelet tensor fuzzy clustering scheme for multi-sensor human activity recognition
He, H. S., Tan, Y., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.01.004 · Cited by 43
Prospective elderly fall prediction by older-adult fall-risk modeling with feature selection
Howcroft, J., Lemaire, E. D., & Kofman, J. (2018) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2018.03.005 · Cited by 42
Chen, P.-W., Baune, N. A., Zwir, I., Wang, J., Swamidass, V., & Wong, A. W. K. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18041634 · Cited by 41
Fan, S., Jia, Y., & Jia, C. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10100290 · Cited by 41
Human activity recognition: suitability of a neuromorphic approach for on-edge AIoT applications
Fra, V., Forno, E., Pignari, R., Stewart, T. C., Macii, E., & Urgese, G. (2022) · Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering · doi:10.1088/2634-4386/ac4c38 · Cited by 42
Hernandez-Cruz, N., Castro, L. A., Medina-Quero, J., Favela, J., Michán, L., & Mortenson, W. B. (2021) · Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.1007/s41666-020-00087-z · Cited by 39
Polese, J. C., Faria, G. S. E., Ribeiro-Samora, G. A., Lima, L. P., Faria, C. D. C. D. M., Scianni, A. A., & Teixeira‐Salmela, L. F. (2019) · Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies · doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.01.011 · Cited by 38
Choi, A., Jung, H., Lee, K., Lee, S., & Mun, J. H. (2019) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-019-02056-0 · Cited by 39
Guided regularized random forest feature selection for smartphone based human activity recognition
Thakur, D., & Biswas, S. (2022) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-022-03862-5 · Cited by 35
Impact of Wearable Measurement Properties and Data Quality on ADLs Classification Accuracy
Poli, A., Cosoli, G., Scalise, L., & Spinsante, S. (2021) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3009368 · Cited by 33
Costa, P. H. V., de Jesus, T. P. D., Winstein, C. J., Torriani‐Pasin, C., & Polese, J. C. (2019) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215519895796 · Cited by 34
A Novel Multichannel Dilated Convolution Neural Network for Human Activity Recognition
Lin, Y., & Wu, J. (2020) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/5426532 · Cited by 33
Feature Selection Optimization using Hybrid Relief-f with Self-adaptive Differential Evolution
Malaysia, U. P., Zainudin, M. N. S., Sulaiman, M. N., Malaysia, U. P., Mustapha, N., Malaysia, U. P., Perumal, T., Malaysia, U. P., Nazri, A., Malaysia, U. P., et al. (2017) · International journal of intelligent engineering and systems · doi:10.22266/ijies2017.0430.03 · Cited by 32
Human activity learning for assistive robotics using a classifier ensemble
Adama, D. A., Lotfi, A., Langensiepen, C. S., Lee, K., & Trindade, P. (2018) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-018-3364-x · Cited by 32
A Novel Approach for Activity Recognition with Down-Sampling 1D Local Binary Pattern Features
Kuncan, F., Kaya, Y., & Kuncan, M. (2019) · Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.4316/aece.2019.01005 · Cited by 32
Farah, J. D., Baddour, N., & Lemaire, E. D. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0486-z · Cited by 31
Unobtrusive Gait Recognition Using Smartwatches
Al-Naffakh, N., Clarke, N., Li, F., & Haskell‐Dowland, P. (2017) · International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG) · doi:10.23919/biosig.2017.8053523 · Cited by 30
Significant Features for Human Activity Recognition Using Tri-Axial Accelerometers
Bennasar, M., Price, B. A., Gooch, D., Bandara, A. K., & Nuseibeh, B. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22197482 · Cited by 29
Feature Space Reduction for Human Activity Recognition based on Multi-channel Biosignals
Hartmann, Y., Liu, H., & Schultz, T. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC) · doi:10.5220/0010260800002865 · Cited by 28
Mišić, D., Zdravković, M. M., Mitković, M., Vitković, N., & Mitković, M. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2819623 · Cited by 29
Lonini, L., Gupta, A. N., Kording, K. P., & Jayaraman, A. (2016) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2016.7591425 · Cited by 27
Chen, X., Hu, D., Zhang, R., Pan, Z., Chen, Y., Xie, L., Luo, J., & Zhu, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2022.1006494 · Cited by 27
Knight, A., & Bidargaddi, N. P. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.099 · Cited by 28
Faria, G. S. E., Polese, J. C., Ribeiro-Samora, G. A., Scianni, A. A., Faria, C. D. C. D. M., & Teixeira‐Salmela, L. F. (2018) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.08.003 · Cited by 26
Hierarchical multi-view aggregation network for sensor-based human activity recognition
Zhang, X., Wong, Y., Kankanhalli, M., & Geng, W. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221390 · Cited by 25
A Two-Dimensional Feature Space-Based Approach for Human Locomotion Recognition
Chinimilli, P. T., Redkar, S., & Sugar, T. G. (2019) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2895289 · Cited by 24
Dutta, D., Sen, S., Aruchamy, S., & Mandal, S. (2022) · Smart Health · doi:10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100264 · Cited by 22
Lateef, R. A. R., & Abbas, A. R. (2022) · Iraqi Journal of Science · doi:10.24996/ijs.2022.63.1.34 · Cited by 21
Yang, X., Xu, Z., Liu, H., Shull, P. B., Redmond, S. J., Liu, G., & Wang, C. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3400022 · Cited by 19
An online feature selection architecture for Human Activity Recognition
Karagiannaki, K., Πανουσοπούλου, Α., & Tsakalides, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2017.7952611 · Cited by 18
Improving Inertial Sensor-Based Activity Recognition in Neurological Populations
Çelik, Y., Aslan, M. F., Sabancı, K., Stuart, S., Woo, W. L., & Godfrey, A. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22249891 · Cited by 19
Anderez, D. O., Lotfi, A., Langensiepen, C. S., & Appiah, K. (2018) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-018-1110-y · Cited by 18
Complex Human Activity Recognition Using a Local Weighted Approach
Aşuroğlu, T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3208686 · Cited by 16
Fatigue Detection Method Based on Smartphone Text Entry Performance Metrics
Al-Libawy, H. A., Al-Ataby, A., Al‐Nuaimy, W., Al-Taee, M. A., & Al-Jubouri, Q. (2016) · International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE) · doi:10.1109/dese.2016.9 · Cited by 16
The Pragmatic Classification of Upper Extremity Motion in Neurological Patients: A Primer
Parnandi, A., Uddin, J., Nilsen, D. M., & Schambra, H. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00996 · Cited by 15
Feature extraction and feature selection in smartphone-based activity recognition
Dehkordi, M. B., Zaraki, A., & Setchi, R. (2020) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.301 · Cited by 15
Manca, M. M., Pes, B., & Riboni, D. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3183228 · Cited by 15
Smart Suspenders With Sensors and Machine Learning for Human Activity Monitoring
Mani, N., Haridoss, P., & George, B. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3263231 · Cited by 13
Activity recognition of stroke‐affected people using wearable sensor
David, A., Ramadoss, R., Ramachandran, A., & Sivapatham, S. (2023) · ETRI Journal · doi:10.4218/etrij.2022-0242 · Cited by 13
A Survey of Vision-Based Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition
Adama, D. A., Lotfi, A., & Ranson, R. M. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10192412 · Cited by 13
Sensor fusion in upper limb area networks: A survey
Duivenvoorden, A., Lee, K., Raison, M., & Achiche, S. (2017) · Global Information Infrastructure and Networking Symposium · doi:10.1109/giis.2017.8169802 · Cited by 13
Tsanousa, A., Μεδίτσκος, Γ., Vrochidis, S., & Angelis, L. (2020) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-020-01836-z · Cited by 12
A benchmark study on feature selection for human activity recognition
Karagiannaki, K., Πανουσοπούλου, Α., & Tsakalides, P. (2016) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2968219.2971421 · Cited by 12
Razfar, N., Kashef, R. F., & Mohammadi, F. A. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23125513 · Cited by 15
Lonini, L., Gupta, A. N., Deems-Dluhy, S., Hoppe-Ludwig, S., Kording, K. P., & Jayaraman, A. (2017) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/rehab.7317 · Cited by 11
Aggelidis, X., Bardoutsos, A., Nikoletseas, S., Papadopoulos, N. G., Raptopoulos, C., & Tzamalis, P. (2020) · International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT) · doi:10.1109/dcoss49796.2020.00015 · Cited by 11
Rosario, M. B. D., Lovell, N. H., & Redmond, S. J. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19132845 · Cited by 9
Human Activity Recognition Based on Transformer via Smart-phone Sensors
Yu, L., Feng, K., & Ren, Z. (2023) · International Conference on Computer Communication and Artificial Intelligence (CCAI) · doi:10.1109/ccai57533.2023.10201297 · Cited by 11
Wearable technology in an international telementoring setting during surgery: a feasibility study
Meijer, H. A. W., Sánchez‐Margallo, J. A., Sanchez-Margallo, F. M., Goslings, J. C., & Schijven, M. P. (2017) · BMJ Innovations · doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000166 · Cited by 10
Stroke Screening Feature Selection for Arm Weakness Using a Mobile Application
Phienphanich, P., Tankongchamruskul, N., Akarathanawat, W., Chutinet, A., Nimnual, R., Tantibundhit, C., & Suwanwela, N. C. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3024292 · Cited by 10
(2020) · The International Arab Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.34028/iajit/18/1/14 · Cited by 10
A new approach for physical human activity recognition based on co-occurrence matrices
Kuncan, F., Kaya, Y., Teki̇n, R., & Kuncan, M. (2021) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-021-03921-2 · Cited by 10
Zainudin, M. N. S., Sulaiman, M. N., Mustapha, N., Perumal, T., & Mohamed, R. (2017) · International Journal of Technology · doi:10.14716/ijtech.v8i5.879 · Cited by 10
An ensemble maximal feature subset selection for smartphone based human activity recognition
Reshmi, S., & Ramanujam, E. (2024) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2024.103875 · Cited by 9
Hsu, Y.-C., Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Chen, F., & Tsui, K.-L. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30135 · Cited by 9
Object-Based Hybrid Deep Learning Technique for Recognition of Sequential Actions
Huang, Y., Kshetrimayum, S., & Chiang, C.-T. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3291395 · Cited by 11
Human Activity Recognition in a Free-Living Environment Using an Ear-Worn Motion Sensor
Boborzi, L., Decker, J., Rezaei, R., Schniepp, R., & Wuehr, M. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24092665 · Cited by 9
Introduction to the Model of the Active Assistance System for Elder and Disabled People
Połap, D., & Woźniak, M. (2016) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_31 · Cited by 9
Feature selection based on Choquet integral for human activity recognition
Jarraya, A., Arour, K., Bouzeghoub, A., & Borgi, A. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE) · doi:10.1109/fuzz-ieee.2017.8015432 · Cited by 9
Automatic Classification of Locomotion in Sport: A Case Study from Elite Netball.
Smith, P. D., & Bedford, A. (2020) · Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport · doi:10.2478/ijcss-2020-0007 · Cited by 9
Designing Classifier For Human Activity Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network
Myo, W. W., Wettayaprasit, W., & Aiyarak, P. (2019) · International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/ccoms.2019.8821638 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Capela, N. A., Lemaire, E. D., & Baddour, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Capela, Nicole A.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-04-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0124414
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4401457
- OpenAlex
- W2066338981
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, feature selection, accelerometer, gyroscope, stroke patients, older adults, mobility monitoring, rehabilitation, ReliefF, correlation-based feature selection, fast correlation-based filter
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Aged, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Monitoring, Physiologic, Safety, Case-Control Studies, Stroke
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
