A comparison of some organizational characteristics of the mouse central retina and the human macula
Open accessAbstract
Mouse models have greatly assisted our understanding of retinal degenerations. However, the mouse retina does not have a macula, leading to the question of whether the mouse is a relevant model for macular degeneration. In the present study, a quantitative comparison between the organization of the central mouse retina and the human macula was made, focusing on some structural characteristics that have been suggested to be important in predisposing the macula to stresses leading to degeneration: photoreceptor density, phagocytic load on the RPE, and the relative thinness of Bruch's membrane. Light and electron microscopy measurements from retinas of two strains of mice, together with published data on human retinas, were used for calculations and subsequent comparisons. As in the human retina, the central region of the mouse retina possesses a higher photoreceptor cell density and a thinner Bruch's membrane than in the periphery; however, the magnitudes of these periphery to center gradients are larger in the human. Of potentially greater relevance is the actual photoreceptor cell density, which is much greater in the mouse central retina than in the human macula, underlying a higher phagocytic load for the mouse RPE. Moreover, at eccentricities that correspond to the peripheral half of the human macula, the rod to cone ratio is similar between mouse and human. Hence, with respect to photoreceptor density and phagocytic load of the RPE, the central mouse retina models at least the more peripheral part of the macula, where macular degeneration is often first evident.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the center of a mouse retina, there are more than 200 photoreceptors for every RPE cell; the ratio decreases to ~12 in the periphery of the human retina and 100-120 in the periphery of a mouse retina.
“In the central human retina, there are 33 photoreceptors associated with each RPE cell (Osterberg, 1935), and, in the center of a mouse retina, there are more than 200 photoreceptors for every RPE cell (Volland et al., 2015); the ratio decreases to ~12 in the periphery of the human retina and 100–120 in the periphery of a mouse retina (Volland et al., 2015).”
From The cell biology of the retinal pigment epithelium (2020) · cites this paper as Volland et al., 2015
In the central mouse retina, each RPE cell serves over 200 photoreceptor cells.
“in the central mouse retina, each RPE cell serves over 200 photoreceptor cells (Volland et al., 2015)”
From Microtubule motors transport phagosomes in the RPE, and lack of KLC1 leads to AMD-like pathogenesis (2015) · cites this paper as Volland et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 229
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [10]Bone RA, Landrum JT, Hime GW, Cains A, Zamor J. Stereochemistry of the human macular carotenoids. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34(6): 2033– 40. Epub 1993/05/01.. 8491553
- [13]Polyak SL. The Retina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1941.
- [25]Sparrow JR, Boulton M. RPE lipofuscin and its role in retinal pathobiology. Exp Eye Res. 2005; 80(5): 595– 606. Epub 2005/05/03. 10.1016/j.exer.2005.01.007. 15862166 · DOI · Paper page
- [48]Hogan MJ. Role of the retinal pigment epithelium in macular disease. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972; 76(1): 64– 80. Epub 1972/01/01.. 5024602
- Authors
- Volland, S., Esteve-Rudd, J., Hoo, J., Yee, C., & Williams, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, David S.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2015-04-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e0125631
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4414478
- OpenAlex
- W1978810668
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 4.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- National Institutes of Health
- National Eye Institute (P30-EY00331, R01 EY07042, R01EY007042, P30EY000331)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- mouse retina, macular degeneration, retinal degeneration models, photoreceptor density, retinal pigment epithelium, phagocytosis, retinal eccentricity
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Macula Lutea, Macular Degeneration, Microscopy, Electron, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Retina, Retinal Degeneration, Bruch Membrane, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review