Cited by 71Research Data Management PracticesData Analysis and ArchivingEthics in Clinical Research

Research Stakeholders’ Views on Benefits and Challenges for Public Health Research Data Sharing in Kenya: The Importance of Trust and Social Relations

Open access
Jao, Irene, Kombe, Francis, Mwalukore, Salim, Bull, Susan, Parker, Michael, Kamuya, Dorcas, Molyneux, Sassy, Marsh, Vicki·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the importance of sharing research data within the international scientific community, but also of the ethical and social challenges this presents, particularly in the context of structural inequities and varied capacity in international research. Public involvement is essential to building locally responsive research policies, including on data sharing, but little research has involved stakeholders from low-to-middle income countries. METHODS: Between January and June 2014, a qualitative study was conducted in Kenya involving sixty stakeholders with varying experiences of research in a deliberative process to explore views on benefits and challenges in research data sharing. In-depth interviews and extended small group discussions based on information sharing and facilitated debate were used to collect data. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis, and charting flow and dynamics in debates. FINDINGS: The findings highlight both the opportunities and challenges of communicating about this complex and relatively novel topic for many stakeholders. For more and less research-experienced stakeholders, ethical research data sharing is likely to rest on the development and implementation of appropriate trust-building processes, linked to local perceptions of benefits and challenges. The central nature of trust is underpinned by uncertainties around who might request what data, for what purpose and when. Key benefits perceived in this consultation were concerned with the promotion of public health through science, with legitimate beneficiaries defined differently by different groups. Important challenges were risks to the interests of study participants, communities and originating researchers through stigmatisation, loss of privacy, impacting autonomy and unfair competition, including through forms of intentional and unintentional 'misuse' of data. Risks were also seen for science. DISCUSSION: Given background structural inequities in much international research, building trust in this low-to-middle income setting includes ensuring that the interests of study participants, primary communities and originating researchers will be promoted as far as possible, as well as protected. Important ways of building trust in data sharing include involving the public in policy development and implementation, promoting scientific collaborations around data sharing and building close partnerships between researchers and government health authorities to provide checks and balances on data sharing, and promote near and long-term translational benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0135545

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [6]Nature. Policy: Availability of data, materials and methods 2014. Available: http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.
  2. [7]Science. Information for authors: Data and materials availability. Available: http://www.sciencemag.org/site/feature/contribinfo/prep/gen_info.xhtml#dataavail.
  3. [29]Virtual Kenya. Virtual Kenya 2011. Available: http://www.virtualkenya.org/maps/map-images/422-chapter-2-spatial-patterns-of-poverty-and-human-well-being.
  4. [49]Merson L, Phong T, Nhan L, Dung N, Kinh N, Ngan T, et al Trust, respect and reciprocity: Developing culturally appropriate data sharing practices in Viet Nam. JERHRE. 2015; 10(2):In press. PMC4692260 26297747
  5. [50]Hate K, Meherally S, Shah More N, Jayaraman A, Bull S, Parker M, et al Sweat, skepticism and uncharted territory: a qualitative study of opinions on data sharing among public health researchers and participants in Mumbai, India. JERHRE. 2015; 10(2):In press. PMC4547203 26297746
  6. [51]Denny S, Silaigwana B, Wassenaar D. Developing ethical practises for public health research data sharing in South Africa: the views and experiences from a diverse sample of research stakeholders. JERHRE. 2015; 10(2):In press. PMC4547312 26297750
  7. [52]Cheah P, Tangseefa D, Somsaman A, Chunsuttiwat T, Nosten F, Day N, et al Perceived benefits, harms and views about how to share data responsibly: a qualitative study of experiences with and attitudes towards data-sharing among research staff and community representatives in Thailand. JERHRE. 2015; 10(2):In press. PMC4547202 26297749

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jao, I., Kombe, F., Mwalukore, S., Bull, S., Parker, M., Kamuya, D., Molyneux, S., & Marsh, V.
Affiliations
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Marsh, Vicki
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0135545
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1885409381
Cited by
71
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Wellcome Trust (092654/Z/10/A, 096527/Z/11/Z, 096527, 092654, WT 085418)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
research data sharing, public health research, stakeholder perspectives, trust building, data ethics, low- and middle-income countries, Kenya
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, International Cooperation, Kenya, Middle Aged, Public Health, Research Personnel, Information Dissemination, Trust, Biomedical Research, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review