CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 132Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementOil Palm Production and SustainabilityForest Management and Policy

‘Naming and shaming for conservation: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon’

Open access
Cisneros, Elías, Zhou, Sophie Lian, Börner, Jan·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0136402PMC PMC4580616
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon has dropped substantially after a peak of over 27 thousand square kilometers in 2004. Starting in 2008, the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment has regularly published blacklists of critical districts with high annual forest loss. Farms in blacklisted districts face additional administrative hurdles to obtain authorization for clearing forests. In this paper we add to the existing literature on evaluating the Brazilian anti-deforestation policies by specifically quantifying the impact of blacklisting on deforestation. We first use spatial matching techniques using a set of covariates that includes official blacklisting criteria to identify control districts. We then explore the effect of blacklisting on change in deforestation in double difference regressions with panel data covering the period from 2002 to 2012. Multiple robustness checks are conducted including an analysis of potential causal mechanisms behind the success of the blacklist. We find that the blacklist has considerably reduced deforestation in the affected districts even after controlling for the potential mechanism effects of field-based enforcement, environmental registration campaigns, and rural credit.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0136402

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imperfect insurance and credit constraints are associated with less investment, smaller profits, and limited growth, thus standing as barriers to development in rural areas.

    “Many studies have pointed out that imperfect insurance and credit constraints are associated with less investment, smaller profits, and limited growth, thus standing as barriers to development in rural areas.25”

    From The Effect of Rural Credit on Deforestation: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon (2020) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction’s forest-policy background discusses restrictions on access to rural credit, and the Discussion considers credit as a possible mechanism affecting deforestation. Neither section links imperfect insurance or credit constraints to lower investment, profits, or growth. Searches for those terms and rural-development effects found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [3]Hargrave J, Kis-Katos K. Economic Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: A Panel Data Analysis for the 2000s. Environ Resource Econ. 2013 2012; 54(4): 471– 94. English.
  2. [5]Arima EY, Barreto P, Araújo E, Soares-Filho B. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: Lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy. 2014; 41: 465– 73.
  3. [6]Soares-Filho B, Moutinho P, Nepstad D, Anderson A, Rodrigues H, Garcia R, et al Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107(24): 10821– 6. PMC2890753 20505122
  4. [7]Canova NP, Hickey GM. Understanding the impacts of the 2007–08 Global Financial Crisis on sustainable forest management in the Brazilian Amazon: A case study. Ecological Economics. 2012; 83: 19– 31.
  5. [8]Mueller B. The Fiscal Imperative and the Role of Public Prosecutors in Brazilian Environmental Policy. Law & Policy. 2010; 32(1): 104– 26.
  6. [9]Börner J, Wunder S, Wertz-Kanounnikoff S, Hyman G, Nascimento N. Forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon: Costs and income effects. Global Environmental Change. 2014; 29: 294– 305.
  7. [10]Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P, Rueda X, Blackman A, Börner J, Cerutti PO, et al Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change. 2014; 28: 129– 40.
  8. [11]Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, et al Brazil's Soy Moratorium. Science. 2015 1 23, 2015; 347(6220): 377– 8. 10.1126/science.aaa0181 25613879 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Jacobs JB, Anechiarico F. Blacklisting public contractors as an anti‐corruption and racketeering strategy. Criminal Justice Ethics. 1992; 11(2): 64– 76.
  10. [14]Tan Y. Transparency without Democracy: The Unexpected Effects of China's Environmental Disclosure Policy. Governance. 2014; 27(1): 37– 62.
  11. [15]McGee R, Gaventa J. Synthesis report: Review of impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives. Cambridge, UK: Transparency and Accountability Initiative, 2010.
  12. [16]Blackman A. Alternative Pollution Control Policies in Developing Countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2010; 4(2): 234– 53.
  13. [17]Tietenberg T. Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environ Resource Econ. 1998; 11(3–4): 587– 602.
  14. [18]Viana C, Coudel E, Barlow J, Ferreira J, Gardener T, Parry L, editors. From Red to Green: Achieving an environmental pact at the municipal level in Paragominas (Pará, Brazilian Amazon). Conference of the International Society of Ecological Economics; 2012 June 16-19th, 2012; Rio de Janeiro: ISEE, 2012.
  15. [21]Hahn J, Todd P, Van der Klaauw W. Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design. Econometrica. 2001; 69(1): 201– 9.
  16. [22]Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis. 2007; 15(3): 199– 236.
  17. [23]Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM. Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and infrastructure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014; 111(11): 4332– 7. PMC3964111 24567397
  18. [24]Jalan J, Ravallion M. Are there dynamic gains from a poor-area development program? Journal of Public Economics. 1998 1/ 1/; 67(1): 65– 85.
  19. [25]Verbeek M. A Guide to Modern Econometrics: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; 2012 2004/ 1.
  20. [26]Pfaff ASP. What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?: Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 1999; 37(1): 26– 43.
  21. [27]Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation: A Review. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research; 1998.
  22. [28]Andersen LE. The Causes of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Environment & Development. 1996; 5(3): 309– 28.
  23. [29]Arima EY, Simmons CS, Walker RT, Cochrane MA. Fire In The Brazilian Amazon: A Spatially Explicit Model For Policy Impact Analysis*. Journal of Regional Science. 2007; 47(3): 541– 67.
  24. [30]Aguiar APD, Câmara G, Escada MIS. Spatial statistical analysis of land-use determinants in the Brazilian Amazonia: Exploring intra-regional heterogeneity. Ecological Modelling. 2007 12/ 16/; 209(2–4): 169– 88.
  25. [31]Araujo C, Bonjean CA, Combes J-L, Combes Motel P, Reis EJ. Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics. 2009 6/ 15/; 68(8–9): 2461– 8.
  26. [33]Ezzine-de-Blas D, Börner J, Violato-Espada A-L, Nascimento N, Piketty M-G. Forest loss and management in land reform settlements: Implications for REDD governance in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Science & Policy. 2011; 14(2): 188– 200.
  27. [34]Andam KS, Ferraro PJ, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa GA, Robalino JA. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008; 105(42): 16089– 94. PMC2567237 18854414
  28. [35]Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983; 70(1): 41– 55.
  29. [36]Gaveau DLA, Epting J, Lyne O, Linkie M, Kumara I, Kanninen M, et al Evaluating whether protected areas reduce tropical deforestation in Sumatra. Journal of Biogeography. 2009; 36(11): 2165– 75.
  30. [37]Honey-Rosés J, Baylis K, Ramírez MI. A Spatially Explicit Estimate of Avoided Forest Loss. Conservation Biology. 2011; 25(5): 1032– 43. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x 21902720 · DOI
  31. [39]Sekhon J. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The matching package for R. Journal of Statistical Software. 2011; 42(7): 1– 52.
  32. [40]Halvorsen R, Palmquist R. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American economic review. 1980; 70(3): 474– 75.
  33. [41]Laporte A, Windmeijer F. Estimation of panel data models with binary indicators when treatment effects are not constant over time. Economics Letters. 2005; 88(3): 389– 96.
  34. [42]Rosenbaum PR. The consquences of adjustment for a concomitant variable that has been affected by the treatment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 1984: 656– 66.
  35. [44]Heckman JJ, Smith JA. The Pre‐programme Earnings Dip and the Determinants of Participation in a Social Programme. Implications for Simple Programme Evaluation Strategies. The Economic Journal. 1999; 109(457): 313– 48.
  36. [47]Luttrell C, Resosudarmo IAP, Muharrom E, Brockhaus M, Seymour F. The political context of REDD+ in Indonesia: constituencies for change. Environmental Science & Policy. 2014; 35: 67– 75.
  37. [48]Burgess R, Hansen M, Olken BA, Potapov P, Sieber S. The Political Economy of Deforestation in the Tropics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012; 127, 1707– 1754.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cisneros, E., Zhou, S. L., & Börner, J.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Cisneros, Elías
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-09-23
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0136402
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0136402
PMC
PMC4580616
OpenAlex
W1907207127
Cited by
132
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (DCI-ENV/2011/269-520)
  • Robert Bosch Stiftung (32.5.8043.0012.0)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
deforestation, blacklisting, Brazilian Amazon, forest loss, environmental law enforcement, naming and shaming, rural credit, policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Brazil, Conservation of Natural Resources, Ecosystem, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review