CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Motor Control and AdaptationNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Correction: The Neural Basis of Typewriting: A Functional MRI Study

Open access
Higashiyama, Yuichi, Takeda, Katsuhiko, Someya, Yoshiaki, Kuroiwa, Yoshiyuki, Tanaka, Fumiaki·2015·PLOS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137265PMC PMC4552683
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Fig 1 is an incorrect, previous version. Please view the corrected Fig 1 here. Fig 1 A diagram of the assumptions underlying the present analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0137265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Typing activates motor areas involved in automated, repetitive tasks but is associated with less engagement in areas responsible for complex motor planning.

    “Higashiyama et al. [35] utilized fMRI to compare the neural activation patterns of typing and handwriting and found that typing activated motor areas involved in automated, repetitive tasks but was associated with less engagement in areas responsible for complex motor planning.”

    From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [35]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Higashiyama, Y., Takeda, K., Someya, Y., Kuroiwa, Y., & Tanaka, F.
ORCID
Venue
PLOS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2015-08-28
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
e0137265
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0137265
PMC
PMC4552683
OpenAlex
W2203127583
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
typewriting, functional MRI, motor control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review