Cited by 42Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareAfrican Education and PoliticsEducation in Rural Contexts

Determinants of Primary School Non-Enrollment and Absenteeism: Results from a Retrospective, Convergent Mixed Methods, Cohort Study in Rural Western Kenya

Open access
King, Nia, Dewey, Cate, Borish, David·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Education is a key element in the socioeconomic development required to improve quality of life in Kenya. Despite the introduction of free primary education, primary school enrollment and attendance levels remain low. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative data, this study explores the determinants of non-enrollment and absenteeism in rural western Kenya and potential mitigation strategies to address these issues. METHODS: The study was conducted in Bwaliro village in rural western Kenya. A random sample of 64 students was obtained by blocking the village primary school's student population according to grade level, gender, and orphan status. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected through interviews with parents, guardians, and key informants, and focus group discussions with students. Quantitative data were compared using chi-square tests, Student's T-test, and Poisson regressions. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Malaria, menstruation, and lack of money were among the most notable determinants of primary school dropout and absenteeism, and these factors disproportionately impacted orphans and female students. Potential mitigation strategies suggested by the community included provision of malaria treatment or prevention, reduction in education costs, expansion of the established school-feeding program, and provision of sanitary pads. CONCLUSION: Despite free primary education, numerous factors continue to prevent children in rural western Kenya from attending primary school. The findings suggest that interventions should primarily target orphaned and female students. Prior to implementation, suggested mitigation strategies should be assessed for cost-effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0138362

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [26]Scott L, Dopson S, Montgomery P, Dolan C, Ryus C. Impact of Providing Sanitary Pads to Poor Girls in Africa [dissertation]. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009.
  2. [29]Aikins MKS. Cost-effectiveness analysis of insecticide-impregnated mosquito nets (bednets) used as a malaria control measure: a study from the Gambia [dissertation]. London: London School of Hygiene Tropical Medicine; 1995. Available: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/682242/. Accessed 2014 Sep 20.
  3. [37]Morgan DL, Krueger RA. The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, N., Dewey, C., & Borish, D.
Affiliations
Ontario Veterinary College (CA)
Corresponding author
King, Nia
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-09-15
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e0138362
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2212458818
Cited by
42
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Guelph
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Education › African Education and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
Keywords
school absenteeism, school dropout, malaria, menstruation, orphans, female students, education costs, school feeding programs, sanitary pads, rural education, free primary education, Western Kenya
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Kenya, Male, Perception, Retrospective Studies, Schools, Statistics as Topic, Students, Cohort Studies, Focus Groups, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review